Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 5, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Five Rare Earths Crucial for Clean Energy Seen in Short Supply

Alternative Energy

Limited supplies of five rare-earth minerals pose a threat to increasing use of clean-energy technologies such as wind turbines and solar panels, a U.S. Energy Department report found.

The substances — dysprosium, terbium, europium, neodymium and yttrium — face potential shortages until 2015, according to the report, which reiterates concerns identified in a report a year ago.

The 2011 report studied 16 elements and related materials, including nickel and manganese, which are used to make batteries. The analysis of so-called critical elements began after rare-earth prices jumped following imposition of export restrictions in 2010 by China, the world’s major producer.

“In recent years, demand for almost all of the materials examined has grown more rapidly than demand for commodity metals such as steel,” the report said.

David Sandalow, assistant secretary for policy and international affairs at the Energy Department, plans to discuss the report today at an event in Washington.

Rare earths became a political and legislative issue after China moved to reduce export quotas in July 2010 by 40 percent. The country accounts for 95 percent of rare-earth production, according to the Energy Department.

The Chinese government said late last month it was leaving the export limits unchanged, and more production from companies including Greenwood Village, Colorado-based Molycorp Inc. (MCP) may ease some supply concerns.
Falling Prices

While prices of rare earths fell in the second half of 2011, they remain volatile, leading some companies to search for ways to consider reducing reliance on the minerals, the Energy Department said.

The department is also researching how to use rare-earths more efficiently, including through recycling, and to increase production in the U.S. The department’s Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy has given about $31.6 million to 14 research projects to study ways to reduce or eliminate use of rare-earth elements.

In Congress, at least a dozen bills have been introduced supporting development of a domestic rare-earth industry, including through U.S. loan guarantees, according to the Energy Department report. None of the measures has passed.

The five minerals most at risk of supply disruptions are used to make wind turbines, solar panels, electric car batteries and energy-efficient lights, according to the report. A 2007 law requiring the phase-out of incandescent light bulbs may increase demand for terbium, europium and yttrium, used in compact fluorescent bulbs that comply with higher efficiency standards, according to the report.
Worldwide Demand

“While these materials are generally used in low volumes relative to other resources, the anticipated deployment of clean-energy technologies could substantially increase worldwide demand,” the report said.

Smaller mining companies have difficulty raising the $100 million to $1 billion it takes to open a rare-earth ore mine, while global mining companies are often not interested because of the relatively small size of the $3 billion market and its unpredictability, the report said.

The report also recommends greater emphasis on education and job training.

“Strengthening the U.S. position across the supply chain requires a capable workforce,” the report said.

Bloomberg



4 Comments on "Five Rare Earths Crucial for Clean Energy Seen in Short Supply"

  1. BillT on Thu, 5th Jan 2012 12:08 pm 

    Hahahahaha…dreams of becoming energy independent is being killed by reality. No one seems to have considered where the minerals and metals were going to come from to expand or even maintain our electronic world where a few minerals are necessary for all of it. Weapons systems, PV panels, even I-pads and cell phones are using up a limited resource. And there are few willing to invest a billion dollars for what might prove to be a loss if China decides to flood the market just after these new mines are producing.

  2. DC on Thu, 5th Jan 2012 12:57 pm 

    Didnt we have the ability to produce for example, light bulbs that had life-times far in excess of what we have today, nearly a century ago? Did they use rare-earth minerals sourced from china back then too? I cant speak for the ‘effeciency’ of those early long-lived bulbs, but they in terms of durability, they far exceed the dispos-a-junk bulbs we all grew up and are only NOW barely beginning to do something about.

    And I also wonder why the amerikans are so concerned about solar panels to begin with. The US still suppresses and actively hinders ANY power source, not controlled by private-for-profit corporations, or that is not powered by coal or oil. Why worry about solar and wind power so much when big coal and oil runs your energy system?

    All this push for ‘high’ tech and ‘rare’ is just the latest round of pushing complex, fragile, and EXPENSIVE ‘solutions’, when what we really need to be doing is make things simpler, cheaper and far more durable than the made-for-the-dump crap we are forced to buy now. As much as I appreciate advanced technoglogy generally, I can see where this is all headed. Were being set up for more planned obsolence, except this time, with high-tech ‘green’ gloss applied to it.

  3. dsula on Thu, 5th Jan 2012 3:09 pm 

    >>and far more durable than the made-for-the-dump crap we are forced to buy now

    Hahaha. Forced to buy ! Choose to buy seems to be the right term.

  4. BillT on Fri, 6th Jan 2012 3:42 pm 

    dsula…have you tried to buy a good, durable light bulb lately? Not available. How about a Fridge that lasts 20+ years without repairs or replacement? I remember the one my grandmother had in the 50s that lasted over 25 years, and was still working when she sold her home and left it behind.

    We live in a world of planned obsolescence…not durability. Now a fridge is lucky to last 10 years and is junked when it stops running because it is about impossible to repair for less than the cost of a new one. Ditto most appliances. Cars also. Homes are also built to MINIMUM standards to pass minimum codes so that they need repairs only a few years after they are built. Most will need expensive major repairs before the last mortgage payment is made. Whereas…there are many home built in the 1800s that are still standing today and look almost new.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *