Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on July 1, 2017
Canada Is Building a 7 Megawatt-Hour Compressed Air Energy Storage Plant
Green energy is a popular topic right now, with many countries signing on to the Paris Climate Accord and planning to move away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.
While most countries are working toward establishing solar and wind power farms, some countries like Canada are looking toward the creation of compressed air storage plants for power storage and generation.
How can compressed air change the way countries use and store green energy?
Compressed Air as Energy Storage
Compressing air in porous caves can serve as a backup form of power that can be tapped when the demand for power is high. Essentially, the compressed air is stored in caves of porous basalt rock when power demand is low. When more power is needed, the air is heated and piped through turbines to generate power.
This is a great way for countries that already rely on wind power to hedge their bets, so to speak—to ensure that there is a sufficient supply of power even if the wind doesn’t blow as much as they would like.
But a problem with this type of energy storage is that it relies on natural gas to heat the air. As of 2016, natural gas use made up more than one third of the US energy industry, and while it is more efficient than coal power, it is still a non-renewable resource.
A Step Away From Natural Gas
The biggest difference between traditional compressed air storage plants and the new 7 MWh plant approved to be built in Goderich, Ontario, is the way the air is heated before being piped through the turbines. As mentioned, standard plants rely on natural gas to heat the air used to generate power. The new Goderich plant, on the other hand, uses a heat exchange system.
This heat exchange system stores the heat that is generated when the air is initially stored. When the air needs to be heated to generate power, that heat is simply released, making this an emission-free form of energy storage.
This is a step away from the traditional energy storage markets. Lithium-ion batteries like the ones in the Tesla Home battery system currently hold the majority of the market. Most of these batteries, though, are designed for small, single-home applications. Compressed air storage, on the other hand, can generate power for entire communities or power grids when the need arises.
Changes in the Compressed Air Market
Compressed air storage plants are a growing field, especially with the global focus on green energy. Anywhere that has a sufficient layer of basalt stone can be used for compressed air storage, making it an option for markets around the world.
The market for the equipment just to treat the air that is being compressed is expected to grow by more than six percent, reaching $11.2 billion by 2025.
Treating the compressed air is important to protect the compression equipment. The ambient air can contain contaminants that could damage or clog the equipment and pollute the compressed air.
With the path toward green energy growing clearer every year, construction projects like the new emission-free compressed air plant in Canada are the first steps toward a green planet, and toward getting humans away from fossil fuels and greenhouse gases.
While construction hasn’t started yet on the Canadian plant, it will be fascinating to see how much power this emission-free plant can generate once it’s up and running, not to mention the amount of power that will eventually come from additional compressed air storage plants in the coming years.
6 Comments on "Canada Is Building a 7 Megawatt-Hour Compressed Air Energy Storage Plant"
Cloggie on Sun, 2nd Jul 2017 12:25 am
Mountains that fart. Current round-trip efficiency is merely 50%, but according to physics 70-80% is in the cards, like with pumped hydro.
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/04/08/ricas-2020-compressed-air-storage/
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/compressed-air-energy-storage/
John Kintree on Sun, 2nd Jul 2017 8:13 am
Hydrostor, the company referenced in this article, claims 60% round trip efficiency of storing electricity.
They also say their technology is being used for hundreds of megawatts, which means multi gigawatt hours of installations that are under development. This is a good sign.
Go Speed Racer on Sun, 2nd Jul 2017 11:14 am
If they claim 60%
then when they run the system,
it must get about 42% efficiency.
To prove this, take manufacturer
claim and multiply by reciprocal
of square root 2. This is the
bullshit coefficient, useful to get
funding.
John Kintree on Sun, 2nd Jul 2017 1:56 pm
Inflated manufacturer claims are a problem. It is also a problem when they say the compressed air energy storage costs half as much as batteries without telling us the cost of the batteries they are using for comparison.
If the current cost of batteries is $300 per kWh, then the Hydrostor compressed air approach costs $150 per kWh.
If a Hydrostor facility charges and discharges a kWh on a daily basis, and does so for 20 years, this would be 7,300 kWh.
Until we get some performance data that tells us otherwise, we can use their figure of 60% round trip efficiency to realize 4,380 of usable kWh over 20 years from a 1 kWh facility.
Dividing the $150 cost of that 1 kWh by 4,380 gets us about $0.034 per kWh life cycle cost. Not bad.
Bob on Sun, 2nd Jul 2017 8:05 pm
This idea is certainly worth a try. It sounds good to me. No toxic elements, degradation. Unlimited cycles. Good efficiency. What’s not to like? Beats CCS (Carbon Capture, Storage) by a light year.
Go Speed Racer on Mon, 3rd Jul 2017 3:00 am
What if the mountain blows its lid.