When you hear the words high tech, you probably imagine a smartphone, a driverless car, maybe even a spaceship.
Having been in the oil and natural gas business for 36 years, I picture 3D seismic imaging that enables scientists to see miles below the seabed floor; the world’s biggest carbon sequestration project; and precision drilling equipment that enables us to bore holes more than 35,000 feet below sea level and hit a target the size of a baseball home plate.
These technological achievements are what make the oil and natural gas business one of the world’s most high-tech industries, and they put us at the forefront of Industry 4.0 – the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Fuel for the energy economy
Since the discovery of California’s Kern River oil field in the late 1800s, the industry has used technology to grow supplies and deliver affordable and reliable energy to the world. Continuous advances in technology have enabled us to keep 100-year-old oilfields producing, to develop cleaner-burning fuels, and to do so with an increasingly smaller environmental footprint.
You’ve heard some of the terms representing these advances – enhanced oil recovery, horizontal drilling, ultra-deepwater production. The foundation of all of these innovations is our ongoing commitment to advance technology to fuel our energy economy.
Today, the global energy system delivers the equivalent of more than 280 million barrels of oil every day from across all sources – oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and renewables – of which oil and natural gas account for 149 million barrels. Meeting that total energy demand requires sufficient liquids to fill more than 18,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools each day, or more than 12 Olympic-sized swimming pools every minute of every day.
As you can imagine, the technology needed to support the global energy system is massive and requires continuous investment. Since 2007, Chevron alone has invested nearly $6 billion on research and development. We’re involved in every step of the technology development chain – from early-stage research to industrial-scale application.
We know ideas can come from anywhere, so our venture capital company scours the world for promising start-ups that can help develop emerging energy technologies. We work on fundamental research and development in partnership with world-class universities, national laboratories and government agencies such as NASA. Our investment focus is finding, developing, producing, processing, transporting and delivering energy – safely, affordably, reliably and at scale.
The end result is that we’re able to produce in places we once only dreamed of. In the early 1950s, in offshore operations, the industry had only the ability to drill in water depths of 100 feet – to a total depth of 5,000 feet. Today, we can drill in water depths of more than 10,000 feet – and then at least another 25,000 feet under the seabed (which, from the water’s surface, is further down than Mount Everest is tall). We’re operating in water depths that require remote-operated vehicles to place and monitor our equipment. And we’re extracting resources from rocks we once bypassed as too difficult or uneconomic.
Improvements in technology have advanced our understanding of the earth’s subsurface geology, making it easier for us to find resources. Dry holes – as a percentage of total US exploratory wells drilled across the industry – have fallen from around 75% in the 1970s and 1980s to around 40% recently.
This has been made possible by advances in earth modeling, 3D and even 4D seismic imaging, risk profiling, and computing power. In this new world, we’re storing vast amounts of data – in petabytes. Since 2002, the data we’ve stored has increased 250-fold, and that number continues to grow. In addition, our production is more efficient because our digital oil fields enable us to remotely monitor thousands of pieces of equipment on six continents in real time.
A transformation in the oil and gas industry
Some advances in technology have been truly transformative, such as those used to unlock US natural gas and oil from rocks with very low porosity, such as shale. Just over a decade ago, the United States was raising red flags about the decline in supplies of domestic natural gas. The industry felt the pressure and began building terminals to import liquefied natural gas, or LNG. But while those import terminals were being built, the industry made a major breakthrough.
Though we had been using hydraulic fracturing to extract hydrocarbons from formations for decades, when the industry combined that with horizontal drilling, we cracked the code to economically producing natural gas – and then oil – from shale. Companies were quick to apply these combined technologies to formations across the country and even advance them for more efficient production. In the process, the United States has re-established its reputation as an energy superpower.
The United States is now the global leader in total combined crude oil and other liquids production, overtaking both Saudi Arabia and Russia. In addition, we’re number one in terms of natural gas production. As a result, some of the LNG import terminals I mentioned above have been converted into export terminals.
In many cases, the world’s supply of natural gas is not located where the gas is needed. To move these fuels across oceans, we convert natural gas into LNG. LNG is natural gas that has been cooled to -260° F (-162° C), changing it from a gas into a liquid that is 1/600th of its original volume. This enables it to be shipped safely and efficiently aboard specially designed LNG vessels. After arriving at its destination, we return the LNG to its gaseous state for delivery through local pipelines. It’s a highly technical and innovative process that is literally lighting up our world.
Other technological advances are less transformative for the world energy supply, but they contribute to our efforts to limit the impact of our operations on the environment. For example, we use state-of-the-art drones for early detection of any unexpected emission releases. We use stationary infrared cameras to look for potential gaseous leaks to ensure the integrity of our equipment and operations. And we use technology to continually evolve our operations to meet tightening environmental standards, such as those to reduce sulfur content in US gasoline. We know it’s through technology that we’ll be able to continue to develop resources in the years ahead while addressing new or more stringent environmental challenges, such as climate change.
No more peak oil
We’re already moving in this direction. I mentioned earlier the world’s biggest carbon dioxide injection project, which we’re building at our Gorgon LNG facility in Australia. Although standard industry practice is to remove the CO2 from the natural gas and vent it to the atmosphere, at the Gorgon Project we plan to extract and inject the naturally occurring CO2 into a formation more than two kilometers beneath the surface. This is game-changing technology to protect the air.
At our neighbouring Wheatstone LNG facility, we’re using cutting-edge technology to micro-tunnel under the shoreline to transport natural gas without disturbing the barrier lagoon system. This system supports mangrove and estuarine habitats for a range of marine fauna, such as migratory shorebirds, turtles, sawfish, and recreational crab and finfish species.
The technology we’re using today has evolved so profoundly from the early years of the Kern River oil field that the topic of “running out of oil”, which once dominated every industry conference, is rarely discussed today. The advances in finding new resources and extending the life of existing ones are so far-reaching that we in the industry have a common refrain: “Tell me when technology will stop advancing, and I’ll tell you when we’ll reach peak oil.” Given how much we’ve advanced our industry – from the days of the simple land-based pump jack to today’s high-tech, digital oil field – I cannot imagine when that day might come.

Even as we celebrate these achievements, our focus is on the future. Chevron is a 137-year-old company active around the world and involved in all aspects of the oil and natural gas business. We’ve been able to thrive as long as we have by continuously finding new technologies and approaches to produce reliable and affordable energy while improving environmental performance – from the production of oil and natural gas to the consumer’s end-use emissions. Through our ongoing creativity and innovation, we’ll continue finding more economically and environmentally efficient ways to power the world in the decades ahead. This is our priority. We know that without continued technological advancements, Chevron and the industry will go the way of the horse-drawn carriage and the steam engine.

Davy on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 4:05 pm
Kathy, you are clouding the argument into the suffering of the masses from what I was describing in the beginning as a human condition of an individual in a metaphysical dimension. What if there were no poverty, then what? What about just a little poverty and but no suffering? You are not being objective here nor using quantifiable units for comparison. Your emotional view point does not make this a scientific argument. It makes it a social issue part science and part emotion. Abstractions don’t quantify well. Micro to the macro dwell in different realities.
Davy on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 4:11 pm
Yea, Joshua, the beauty of the model is the inclusion of price but that is also its weakness. The model is one of the most important peak oil dynamics in my opinion but one must still be guarded about accuracy with price involved. Economics is considered a pseudo science for a reason.
rockman on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 5:29 pm
Kathy – Can’t disagree about the AGW path we’re on. But I wasn’t. My response was about the predicted demise of the oil industry in just the next 5 years. Do you really buy that potential or did I misread you?
As far as staying up on blogs and the PO issue it sounds like you’ve been spending more time on much more honorable efforts. I don’t want to take you away from those efforts but here’s a quick heads up on EROEI: “We know the ERoEI of oil is going down.” Actually the undeniable FACT is that since oil prices collapsed the EROEI of prospects CURRENTLY being drilled has INCREASED considerably from what it was several years ago. Remember drilling decisions are not based on EROEI but on anticipated rate of return. Very simply: I need to find more bbls of $50 oil to create the same rate of return as I did when oil was $90 per bbl. The AMOUNT of energy to drill and frac the same Eagle Ford Shale well today is exactly what it was 3 years ago. Thus the energy invested is the same but the energy returned (since I have to produce more lower priced oil to get the anticipated ROR) is greater. IOW a bigger ER divided by the same EI = higher EROEI ratio. Simple math, eh?
This idea that EROEI is on some constantly declining curve highlights a very unsophisticated understanding of the hydrocarbon extraction dynamic. But easy to understand how that myoptic view would come to that erroneous conclusion after watching the big decrease in EROEI that accompanied the big oil price increase. That’s why the EROEI during the shale boom decreased: not because it was taking more energy to drill those wells but because it required LESS oil to generate an acceptable ROR. Smaller ER divided by the same EI = lower EROEI ratio. Same simple math, eh? LOL
I’ll assume you’ve understood what I just explained since I’m sure you’re smarter then a 5th grader. LOL. So let me be blunt: if someone is predicting some aspects of the future fossil fuel dynamic and they also think that EROEI has been on a constant decline how confident will you be in anything else the say? From what I just explained the dominant controlling factor of EROEI isn’t how much energy is consumed but the price which determins the volume of oil required to develope.
If you buy what I just explained: if oil goes to $20/bbl or less in a few years think how much higher the EROEI will be for wells being drilled AT THAT TIME. Granted not as many wells will be drilled then as are being drilled today but those that are will have very nice EROEI’s.
It really isn’t that difficult to appreciate, is it?
kenxxx3000 on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 6:22 pm
All you technofags that are here to prove peak oil isn’t coming stop visiting this site and enjoy your techno fagotry.
GregT on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 7:41 pm
“Yes he does:”
Short never said that we would run out of combustable materials cloggie. There will be plenty of oil left in the ground after the world goes over the net energy cliff. There’s a big difference between the oil that is affordable and can provide net energy to the economy, and “combustable materials”. Just as there is a very big difference between alternate electric power generation derived from fossil fuels, and so called renewable energy. (which does not exist)
Boat on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 10:20 pm
greggiet,
Short has claimed that oil prices will keep dropping. As the price drops the oil industry will go under around 2019. Somehow the model ya’ll believe in totally disregards the supply and demand dynamic that has ruled capitalism for hundreds of years. You doomers have a history of accepting any kind of rhetoric that pronounces some kind of collaspe in the near future.
GregT on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 10:36 pm
Capitalism has never been ‘ruled’ by supply and demand kevin. It has been ruled by a small group of very powerful men.
Short’s model makes complete sense, you do not make any sense at all. Not even remotely close.
And the word that so desperately alludes you is collapse. Not collaspe. You are a comedy of errors Boat. A real modern day Einstein.
GregT on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 10:45 pm
And also kevin, Short’s model shows the dead state for oil to be around 2030, not 2019, but keep spreading your brain dead nonsense. It makes you look real smart.
sidzepp on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 10:49 pm
True technological revolutions.
1) Fire, a long time ago and no patent
2) The wheel, again, a long time ago and no patent
3) The printing press. Bringing information to the masses.
4) Steam power, increasing the efficiency of labor. An increased labor force needs and increased market.
5) Train, auto, plane-revolutionizing transportation and allowing the resettlement of massive amounts of people.
5) Urban area sanitation networks, eliminating disease
All of the innovation we have seen in the last fifty years is nothing more than improvement on the first five. Until we see innovation that is truly revolutionary, i.e., Guttenberg inventing the printing press; we will continue on the same spiral of dependency on increases in GDP to permit the status quo to continue it’s current existence.
makati1 on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 10:59 pm
GregT, maybe Boat’s PC doesn’t have spell check? Or he doesn’t know how to use it.
GregT on Mon, 23rd Jan 2017 11:19 pm
If Boat’s issues could be solved by a spell checker mak. He could be a genius, if he simply upgraded to windows 95.