Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Why oil prices are at a record high

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Zardoz » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 05:18:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '.')..The seven sisters collude with each other and they collude with govt...

Perhaps a little bit, but certainly not nearly to the extent you think they do. I'd say Strahan had it right in the Guardian article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n Whitehall, legs will remain crossed and buttocks clenched as politicians and officials pray to God that it doesn't happen in their term of office, or before they draw their inflation-linked pension.

I just don't see these people (government hacks) sitting at a control panel, twisting the dials and flipping the switches that determine our destinies. I see them worrying mostly about their personal issues, and very little about the big picture.

As for the oil business, it's just free enterprise at work. There is no Global Oil Czar. Nobody's in charge. No captain is setting a course. There's no real cooperation. Everybody's out for themselves, promoting their own products, seeking an advantage in a competitive business. That's how we got to this precarious position. If somebody was in charge, we wouldn't be facing the future that we know lies before us.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby mkwin » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 09:03:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')Peak, The seven sisters collude with each other and they collude with govt. If you don't understand the corrupting force of oil money on the judicial, executive and legislative branches of govt, it's not my problem, but it could become your's. A meaningful discussion about the severity of diminishing supply and how it will play out, is a non-starter if you don't understand the political process/abscess.


The time when the Seven Sister was colluding with each other has long gone. Don't forget Standard Oil was broken up for monopolistic practices. Rockefeller didn't give up on his market manipulation straight away! That was, however, 70 years ago. The ownership structures of the IOC's have changed drastically since then and they are mainly owned by institutional and small private investors not by billionaire oil barons.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 09:51:22

Zardoz has it about right, the world has collectively drifted into this crisis without being steered and everyone is ill-prepared to seize the initiative. It would be like expecting the cabin crew to land an airliner. They are not competent for the task.

I think threadbear and many others are too quick to ascribe omniscience, omnipotence and malvolent intent to higher authorities, perhaps out of mistrust, even hatred, or an innate preference for a simple all-explaining truth. Life doesn't work like that, and they give them too much credit. Most authorities will be like rabbits in the headlights, once they actually see the headlights.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby TheDude » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 10:36:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Armageddon', '
')Any guess to when the US runs below MOL ?


In 2008.


Why, that's next year!

I'm starting a dedicated topic on Minimum Operating Level (MOL).
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby shortonoil » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 12:56:46

threadbear said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou could be right, Twilight. My guess is you're wrong, obviously. I'll lay bets that within a year, you will be reading about nothing but nukes and the groundwork will have begun to construct hundreds of them, in Britain, and the U.S. I'll send you a fruitbasket of your choosing, if I'm wrong. Furthermore, I'll admit I'm a complete fruitcake.


Nuclear energy requires a 2/3’rds up-front investment. That is, you invest 6.7 cents into building the plant, for every 10 cent kilowatt hr ever delivered. With the financial Armageddon that is developing, Britain or any industrialized country will soon be lucky if they can afford the gasoline for the Primer’s Rolls, to say nothing about building 100’s of nuclear plants. To image that anyone will have the resources to rebuild our economic system after this collapse, is as close to ridiculous as one can get.

DantesPeak wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')rmageddon wrote:

Any guess to when the US runs below MOL ?


In 2008.


This will certainly be true, if the above does not occur before then.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 13:18:00

I don't see why building reactors should be so hard. The French, and everyone else, did it in the last oil crisis.

You don't need very much money, and you can loan it at sovereign rates. Like the French did.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby mkwin » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 13:18:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '
')
Nuclear energy requires a 2/3’rds up-front investment. That is, you invest 6.7 cents into building the plant, for every 10 cent kilowatt hr ever delivered. With the financial Armageddon that is developing, Britain or any industrialized country will soon be lucky if they can afford the gasoline for the Primer’s Rolls, to say nothing about building 100’s of nuclear plants. To image that anyone will have the resources to rebuild our economic system after this collapse, is as close to ridiculous as one can get.



The UK could replace its entire grids capacity with around 40 nuclear plants at a cost of $75 billion dollars. Over a 7 year build programe thats just under $11 billion a year. i.e. Nothing for govenment that has a revenue of $900 billion. The issue with nuclear is not if it is affordable for the goverment, it clearly is, the issue is number 1 governments don't supply power to citizens and 2 is nuclear the most optimum choice.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 13:31:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'T')he UK could replace its entire grids capacity with around 40 nuclear plants at a cost of $75 billion dollars. Over a 7 year build programe thats just under $11 billion a year. i.e. Nothing for govenment that has a revenue of $900 billion. The issue with nuclear is not if it is affordable for the goverment, it clearly is, the issue is number 1 governments don't supply power to citizens and 2 is nuclear the most optimum choice.

How big would those reactors be?

Because if they are big ones you are looking at more like $150-200 for 40 reactors. The last few years have seen massive cost inflation due to increasing demand and supply bottlenechs, not to mention dollar devaluation.

Still, while governments don't supply power, they might well finance and maybe also own power plants. That's the best way to run nuclear energy as it minimize capital costs, which are the dominating costs for nuclear.

Still, even if we look at $200 billion (£100 billion), that's just 100 billion/60 million= £1667 per citizen. £6667 for a family of four. That's nothing, especially if you pay it over 15 years, a reasonable time for a strong and fast program. £444 per family and year for 15 years.

And this isn't even an expense. It's an investement which will earn the money back reasonably fast, and then turn into a pure money printer.

It's a win-win proposal.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby shortonoil » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 13:52:54

mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he UK could replace its entire grids capacity with around 40 nuclear plants at a cost of $75 billion dollars. Over a 7 year build programe thats just under $11 billion a year. i.e. Nothing for govenment that has a revenue of $900 billion. The issue with nuclear is not if it is affordable for the goverment, it clearly is, the issue is number 1 governments don't supply power to citizens and 2 is nuclear the most optimum choice.



Those estimates are how old? Of the 163 nuclear plants that have been built in the US and Britain, there has never been one completed on schedule or within budget. To image that all of a sudden that we have developed the capacity to build 40 nuks for $75 billion is hyperbola at best. In an era of soaring construction cost, resource depletion and qualified personal shortages in all fields, to say nothing of the political obstacles that would have to be overcome, such a feat would approach the capabilities of a magician.

Furthermore, within the 7 to 20 year period it would require for those plants to be completed, we will have fallen so far down Hubbert's curve, that it is likely that no large scale projects of any kind will be possible!
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby mkwin » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 14:35:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hose estimates are how old?


Two years

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')f the 163 nuclear plants that have been built in the US and Britain, there has never been one completed on schedule or within budget. To image that all of a sudden that we have developed the capacity to build 40 nuks for $75 billion is hyperbola at best. In an era of soaring construction cost, resource depletion and qualified personal shortages in all fields, to say nothing of the political obstacles that would have to be overcome, such a feat would approach the capabilities of a magician.


Would you care to provide any backing to your speculation? The new reactors are estimated at a cost of between $1-1.5 a watt capital cost. Assuming a 1.6 gw and a medium cost of 1.75 a watt design thats $2 billion per unit.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he industry feels strongly that the $1000-1500 per kW level is achievable now and reflects a rigorous design, engineering and construction assessment. Achieving costs at this level will make a major contribution to the competitiveness of new reactors against alternative technologies. For those reactors achieving orders,such as EPR14, their competitiveness is already clearly recognized by customers.

Source: The New Economics of Nuclear power http://www.uic.com.au/neweconomics.pdf

Also the cost of the french system is comparable to the estimate i gave and this was a mass roll-out of nuclear plants.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he example of France (58 reactors) shows that industrial organization and standardization of a series ofreactors allowed construction costs, construction time and operating and maintenance costs to be brought under control. The total overnight investment cost of the French PWR programme amounted to less than 75 billion euros at 2004 prices. When divided by the total installed capacity (63 GW), the average overnight cost is less than 1300 euros 2004/kW. This is much in line with the costs that were thenprovided by the manufacturers.

Source: The New Economics of Nuclear power http://www.uic.com.au/neweconomics.pdf


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')urthermore, within the 7 to 20 year period it would require for those plants to be completed, we will have fallen so far down Hubbert's curve, that it is likely that no large scale projects of any kind will be possible!

Hubberts curve is indicative not an absolute estimate if it was it is 7 years late. By 2030 we will probably still be producing 60-70 million barrels on conventional oil plus up to 25 million non-conventional. See Hirsch and The Oil Drum forecasts.

The bottom line is peak oil is a liquid fuel problem not an energy problem in general something many people here fail to grasp.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 14:47:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '
')

Those estimates are how old? Of the 163 nuclear plants that have been built in the US and Britain, there has never been one completed on schedule or within budget. To image that all of a sudden that we have developed the capacity to build 40 nuks for $75 billion is hyperbola at best. In an era of soaring construction cost, resource depletion and qualified personal shortages in all fields, to say nothing of the political obstacles that would have to be overcome, such a feat would approach the capabilities of a magician.

Furthermore, within the 7 to 20 year period it would require for those plants to be completed, we will have fallen so far down Hubbert's curve, that it is likely that no large scale projects of any kind will be possible!


The electrical grid in the US has to be replaced anyway, and soaring labor costs won't be a problem when masses of people are unemployed. Procurement of materials, as well, may not represent an insurmountable problems, in a global economic slowdown.

In a crisis situation, you honestly don't think they could be built and operating within 7 years? Nonsense.

I am very anti-nuke, btw, but understand how the corporatocracy works, and it appears to be quite nuke friendly. Did you read the Nuclear Spin link I provided?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 15:02:35

7 years is unreasonable. 15 is reasonable. If you did it in a frantic no-costs-barred fashion you might be able to do it in 10 years. Maybe. But that wouldn't make sense as that would be expensive nuclear power. Do it in 15 years and it will be cheap. By the way...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')l Gore is to be the star turn at a dinner where guests have paid at least £1,000 a head, and some will have parted with £50,000 for their share of the Aberdeen Angus steak and pink champagne, under the high ornate ceilings of London's Royal Courts of Justice. The combined wealth of the diners has been estimated at £100bn. But the most unusual aspect of the evening is not the price of the tickets but the nature of the floor show. In place of professional performers, the guests will be regaled by people who are not always thought of as entertainers, though some think they are all mad. They are inventive British boffins who care about climate change.

Here we have the funding for the British nuke program, if all else fails. Take their money and give them shares in the nuke power company as compensation.

http://environment.independent.co.uk/cl ... 191512.ece
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby shortonoil » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 16:49:25

threadbear said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he electrical grid in the US has to be replaced anyway, and soaring labor costs won't be a problem when masses of people are unemployed. Procurement of materials, as well, may not represent an insurmountable problems, in a global economic slowdown.


Unfortunately, you can not take Joe-SixPack, the paper pusher from the latest mortgage originator bankruptcy and give him the job of rewiring a 3 phase, 440 volt industrial control system. You need highly trained, experienced personal to build and operate a new power grid, and we don’t have them. Further more, it takes years to train them, and we don’t have years either.

This comment is so representative of the average, non industrially experienced American. If I can image it, it must be possible. Just throw some money at the problem, and presto its all better! It takes highly skilled people to run this type of infrastructure and people who are even more highly skilled to build it. When this country shipped its manufacturing sectors out of the country, it shipped its skills base with it. The US no longer even has the skills to produce machine tools. [The tools that you use to build machines.] As far as the money is concerned, the US Bretton Woods credit card that we have been using for the last fifty years, is max’d out. I seriously doubt that Britain is in any better shape.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby shortonoil » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 17:52:09

mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ould you care to provide any backing to your speculation? The new reactors are estimated at a cost of between $1-1.5 a watt capital cost. Assuming a 1.6 gw and a medium cost of 1.75 a watt design thats $2 billion per unit.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')uclear critic Alan Nogee of the Union of Concerned Scientists said, "The nuclear industry has never delivered a project on time and on budget."


BUGETS

My information mostly comes from a colleague and friend who has spent his life building and managing power plants. The industry has not gotten any better at building nuclear plants than they ever were, and by the looks of it they never will.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')inland's experience, however, suggests that it remains difficult to build a nuclear plant on budget. The plant, the first of a kind designed by the French company Areva, is running two years behind schedule and $2.1 billion over budget. One problem is that concrete provided by an Indian firm included too much water, raising safety concerns among Finnish regulators. Constellation Energy is considering using this design.

"While it is a disappointment because it is over the original schedule, by the standards of U.S. plant construction in the 1980s, it is a world record," said Thomas A. Christopher, chief executive of Areva's U.S. subsidiary.


POST

A simple google search of :”Nuclear power cost overruns budgets schedules”, should fully convince you!
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 24 Nov 2007, 19:09:16

I will second that. No skilled labour force is that flexible. It is stating the obvious, but it cannot be turned around in less than one education cycle even neglecting additional time to ramp up. Remember the old saying "You have to find oil before you can produce it"; equally you need to build the workforce before you build something on that scale. Nobody keeps an organisation fully staffed waiting for work. When the belated go-ahead comes, as it surely will, check whether everything is in place ready to go. There is a good chance they will still be in the middle of hiring and training.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby mkwin » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 09:13:07

Did France have a load of unemployed nuclear engineers before it began its rapid civilian nuclear program?

It takes on average 5 years to construct a nuclear plant so for a large scale program like the one proposed I agree with Starvid a 15-year total program would be very achievable. Within that period the necessary training could easily be done. It takes 3 years to study a nuclear engineering degree and maybe 5 years post degree experience to get to a safe level of competence. Personnel would not be a problem.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 10:31:29

I agree a 15 year programme is possible, my point was anything less is not. The UK will be burning natural gas through the next decade hoping it can get enough construction underway by 2020. Every year without a clear go-ahead is a year less, and it's not as if we have an infinite quantity of reliably available natural gas to play with. I will be much reassured once politicians put their balls on the line on this issue. We are only committed once they can't back out.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby shortonoil » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 14:03:45

Twilight said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') agree a 15 year programme is possible, my point was anything less is not. The UK will be burning natural gas through the next decade hoping it can get enough construction underway by 2020.


Where is the UK going to get 15 years of natural gas from? If oil prices continue to increase at the rate they have for the last five years, crude will be selling for about $2,700 per barrel in 2022. If prices go to that level, people will be putting more effort into their next meal, than they will the next nuclear power plant to come online.

Money is not wealth, it is supposed to be a symbolic representation of some real value. We may have the money to build nuclear plants, I doubt we will ever again possess the wealth.

Basing an entire worldwide civilization on one depleting commodity, is probably the stupidest thing the human race has ever done, or will ever do.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 14:50:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '[')b]Twilight said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') agree a 15 year programme is possible, my point was anything less is not. The UK will be burning natural gas through the next decade hoping it can get enough construction underway by 2020.


Where is the UK going to get 15 years of natural gas from? If oil prices continue to increase at the rate they have for the last five years, crude will be selling for about $2,700 per barrel in 2022. If prices go to that level, people will be putting more effort into their next meal, than they will the next nuclear power plant to come online.

Money is not wealth, it is supposed to be a symbolic representation of some real value. We may have the money to build nuclear plants, I doubt we will ever again possess the wealth.

Basing an entire worldwide civilization on one depleting commodity, is probably the stupidest thing the human race has ever done, or will ever do.


Your math is extrapolated from current consumption and your assumptions that consumption will grow or remain flat, in an economy that is continuing to grow. Consumption is going to drop tremendously as we are heading into a Depression. Nuclear facility build up, along with replacing and restoring crumbling infrastructure of all kinds, will be a way for govts to funnel fiat dollars to displaced population through work programs and educations.

If you look at how our economy is performing, the collapse of the real estate bubble, we very much resemble Japan before they entered recession some 15 years ago. The govt responded by lowering interest rates to zero and implementing vast make work programs. This seems to be the least worst solution, and one where the corporatocracy makes out like bandits.

It remains to be seen whether the ptb in N. America and Britain can pull this off, but they sure will try.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Why oil prices are at a record high

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 15:00:46

I can't tell you where the gas and the people are going to come from. I can only tell you what is being attempted.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests