by americandream » Mon 11 Nov 2013, 14:39:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'F')ractional reserve banking is a myth. The use of forwardised value (fractional reserves) merely reflects the forwardising of gross labour surplus (for example outsourced value (forget nationalist sentiment within capitalists) as valued by global capital which includes American capital. Without the social relations that arise in a globalised system like capital, the use of labour value forwardising (fractional reserves) would be an absurdity. Hence the resilience of systems which engage in easing (the application of the socialised component of labour surplus) to the market place in the midst of this practice which seems to defy the logic of thrift...this can go on for as long as accumulation is robust.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'A')mericandream, I'm not sure the infinite growth paradigm is a direct result of mercantile or capitalist tradition. I think it's more to do with the debt-and-growth economic requirements of fractional reserve banking.
It's not about labour, but production. As they say, we don't all get more productive every year. We use more energy and/or use it more efficiently. And we flood the market with money using fractional reserve debt-based growth. And it crashes. The banks have engineered it in such a way that they win in both scenarios. It's not all just about your Marxist take on capital and labour.
Capitalism can exist relatively benignly locally without the need for the banking farce we now have to live with and that will drive us into a brick wall. In order to stop the infinite growth paradigm, we have to stop the reason why infinite growth is necessary. And it is the mechanisms of fractional reserve that make it a necessity. It is not a myth just because it doesn't fit into your world view.
It's at times like these that I'd love to see the return of Reverse Engineer

This is the fallacy that many labour under.
1 Capitalism is a socio-economic construct. In other words, like all systems of human society that have gone before, capitalism is the current construct.
2 Labour is the value source capitalists harness to render otherwise dead commodities with value. That value (labour surplus) is then divided between the capitalist (for the use of his capital) and labour (for his input.)
3 There are a range of tendencies in capital which are fundamental to the system:
a. The need for the capitalist to constantly grow and increase his market capture. Hence we find that once parochial capitalists mature to global proportions (the fight for market dominance).
b The relentless drive by capitalists to increase their take of labour surplus and the opposing tendency for a market with value (hence the emergence of debt and an emasculated banking sector in a bid to forwardise spending by labour whilst pruning their share of labour surplus...which accounts for falling wages and rising debt.)
c The withering of the state as capitalists chase markets beyond their borders.
d The collapse of all forms of community including the family as the market polarises to its base unit, the individual.
To suggest that capital can exist without banks is like night without day, life without breath. Fractional reserve (forwardised labour value) merely facilitates the market place and its exchange. In a market place with degrading labour returns, it should be evident to you that credit is the natural mechanism by which labour value will be forwardised (and 2 or even 3 jobs become common place.)
How this is relevant to peak oil? Oil (energy) provides the necessary momentum by which labour is harnessed by capital for surplus and exchange. As that energy source gets more expensive, the capitalists act of accumulation reaches its point of maximum return and peaks. Globalisation breaks down and wars ensue.