Civilization is coming to an end.
I heard that.
A lot of people are going to die.
Yeah, I heard that too... 4-5 years ago.
It's hopeless.
Yeah, I heard you the first time.
You're in denial if you entertain any other notion than The Great Die-Off and The End Of The World As We Know It.
Well, sorry, I just can't concentrate my mind to the exclusion of everything else for more than about 4 years at a stretch. So my mind is starting to wander.
What's your mind wandering to?
To Ray Kurzweil's thesis that the Law of Accelerating Returns will lead Inexorably to the Technological Singularity within a couple of decades.
A pox on thee!
New York Times: "The Future Is Now? Pretty Soon, at Least"
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NYT', 'B')efore we get to Ray Kurzweil’s plan for upgrading the “suboptimal software” in your brain, let me pass on some of the cheery news he brought to the World Science Festival last week in New York.
Do you have trouble sticking to a diet? Have patience. Within 10 years, Dr. Kurzweil explained, there will be a drug that lets you eat whatever you want without gaining weight.
Worried about greenhouse gas emissions? Have faith. Solar power may look terribly uneconomical at the moment, but with the exponential progress being made in nanoengineering, Dr. Kurzweil calculates that it’ll be cost-competitive with fossil fuels in just five years, and that within 20 years all our energy will come from clean sources.
PeakOil is You
NYT: "The Future Is Now"
First unread post • 9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
NYT: "The Future Is Now"
by Schadenfreude » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 16:58:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t may sound too good to be true, but even his critics acknowledge he’s not your ordinary sci-fi fantasist. He is a futurist with a track record and enough credibility for the National Academy of Engineering to publish his sunny forecast for solar energy.
He makes his predictions using what he calls the Law of Accelerating Returns
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow, he sees biology, medicine, energy and other fields being revolutionized by information technology. His graphs already show the beginning of exponential progress in nanotechnology, in the ease of gene sequencing, in the resolution of brain scans. With these new tools, he says, by the 2020s we’ll be adding computers to our brains and building machines as smart as ourselves.
This serene confidence is not shared by neuroscientists like Vilayanur S. Ramachandran, who discussed future brains with Dr. Kurzweil at the festival. It might be possible to create a thinking, empathetic machine, Dr. Ramachandran said, but it might prove too difficult to reverse-engineer the brain’s circuitry because it evolved so haphazardly.
“My colleague Francis Crick used to say that God is a hacker, not an engineer,” Dr. Ramachandran said. “You can do reverse engineering, but you can’t do reverse hacking.”
Dr. Kurzweil’s predictions come under intense scrutiny in the engineering magazine IEEE Spectrum, which devotes its current issue to the Singularity. Some of the experts writing in the issue endorse Dr. Kurzweil’s belief that conscious, intelligent beings can be created, but most think it will take more than a few decades.
He is accustomed to this sort of pessimism and readily acknowledges how complicated the brain is. But if experts in neurology and artificial intelligence (or solar energy or medicine) don’t buy his optimistic predictions, he says, that’s because exponential upward curves are so deceptively gradual at first. ...
[web]http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/singularity[/web]
IEEE Spectrum
- Schadenfreude
Re: NYT: "The Future Is Now"
by thylacine » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 19:47:11
I saw Kurzweil interviewed on some programme I was watching a few weeks ago. He came across as a desperate old man. Desperate to cling on to life. He chomps his way through 180 to 210vitamin and supplement tablets a day in the hope that he can extend his life long enough to see The Singularity.
It's an interesting idea, but I still reckon we're more likely to see economic collapse and die-off than the Singularity.
What will I feel when I read in the next 20 or so years that Ray Kurzweil has shuffled off his mortal coil? Schadenfreude perhaps!
It's an interesting idea, but I still reckon we're more likely to see economic collapse and die-off than the Singularity.
What will I feel when I read in the next 20 or so years that Ray Kurzweil has shuffled off his mortal coil? Schadenfreude perhaps!
-
thylacine - Peat
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Thu 19 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Re: NYT: "The Future Is Now"
by kjmclark » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 20:07:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schadenfreude', '
')"He is accustomed to this sort of pessimism and readily acknowledges how complicated the brain is. But if experts in neurology and artificial intelligence (or solar energy or medicine) don’t buy his optimistic predictions, he says, that’s because exponential upward curves are so deceptively gradual at first. ..."
')"He is accustomed to this sort of pessimism and readily acknowledges how complicated the brain is. But if experts in neurology and artificial intelligence (or solar energy or medicine) don’t buy his optimistic predictions, he says, that’s because exponential upward curves are so deceptively gradual at first. ..."
Except that Kurzweil's exponential upward curves aren't the only ones we have to deal with:
From "Fermenting the Food Supply".
-
kjmclark - Coal
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
