Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

2005 Forecast

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

2005 Forecast

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 15 Jun 2005, 14:10:57

Here is a forecast based on data from the new BP review.

Note: If you want to argue about whether the revisions in this year’s BPSR are bogus or not, please feel free to do so in the “general discussion” forum.

25 of the 53 nations covered in the survey are in depletion. The two most alarming are the UK (10%) and Australia (14%) per our conversations earlier, the Nordic/Aussie Slide is in effect. Total global production was 80.3 mbo/d last year.

If you assume that 2005 will be like 2004, and the nations that had increased production will continue to increase at the same rate, and the same for the nations that decreased, you get about 84 gb of production, an increase of about 4.9% over the “revised” figures from 2003.

But, we know this will not be the case in a couple of instances: First, Russia is thought to be unable to grow this year, due to the Yukos problem. Secondly, Iraq is now thought to be unable to grow because their production and distribution system is “falling apart”. The third case is Saudi Arabia, which the IEA
believes is at or near full capacity:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')ttp://omrpublic.iea.org/currentissues/full.pdf

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')roduction from Saudi Arabia is assessed to have moved higher again in April, reaching 9.45 mb/d for the month versus 9.35 mb/d in March.


I have temporarily assumed Saudi production to average 10.5 mbo/d which is the IEA’s estimate of their maximum sustainable capacity. If you make the adjustments and recalculate, you still get 81.7 mbo/d (as defined by the BPSR people) which is still an increase over and above the 80.2 mbo/d for 2004, so the world will not be in depletion. You can further extrapolate out into the future the next few years, and this will still continue to be the case until at least 2008, unless more nations go into depletion or the rate of supply increase cannot be sustained by nations like Ecuador and Kazahkstan.

This is great news, right?

Well, if you do exactly the same thing with global consumption, you get the following:

Year Prod Demand/Cons
2004 act 80.2 80.7
2005 est 81.7 83.7
2006 est 83.7 86.7
2007 est 86.3 90.6
2008 est 89.3 94.5

So, whether you hit the “peak” or not appears to be pretty irrelevant because starting this year, somebody is going to have to do without some oil. We should be feeling the ramifications of this from a pricing standpoint in the next few months.

There are a couple more items:

The non-OPEC, non FSU oil production has been in decline for 5 out of the last 7 years. What this means is that the world’s growth will have to be supplied by OPEC and the FSU. If OPEC is maxed out, and the FSU is not going to grow, this is a potential issue, and something’s got to give.

Several friendly countries have actually reduced their oil consumption last year: Austria, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Japan and Italy, and a few others. Thanks to them, some Chinese people can drive to work.
Last edited by pup55 on Thu 15 Jun 2006, 21:46:36, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby khebab » Wed 15 Jun 2005, 14:28:15

Interesting! It means we have not reach Peak Production yet (probably not before 2010) but demand is largely above production starting this year. How do we qualify this event, Peak Demand? Demand Destruction? because production will impose a ceiling to our consumption and therefore demand has to be pull down by supply. Of course, you are not taking into account new hypothetical discoveries in your projection.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 15 Jun 2005, 14:42:46

You are right about the discoveries.

If you take the 7 gb discovered last year, and divide by 365 for gb per day, and again by 30 for a 30-year field lifetime, that comes to about .6 mbo/d. So, this does not make up for the increase in demand, even if the spigot can be turned on immediately.

There will be demand destruction, allright. Anybody too poor to afford the oil will not get it.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby khebab » Wed 15 Jun 2005, 15:47:38

In fact, PO is a double event: first demand peak (2005) and is constrained then production is peaking several years later (2010-2013?). These two events form a kind of plateau where price will be very instable before depletion really sets in.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 15 Jun 2005, 16:06:31

This depletion thread has always been my favorite, bc it is fact oriented, not simply comment. I appreciate you all that have the mental ability to do all these calculations spending the time to regurgitate them here in a way that those less gifted like myself can understand.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby nth » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 14:55:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', 'I')n fact, PO is a double event: first demand peak (2005) and is constrained then production is peaking several years later (2010-2013?). These two events form a kind of plateau where price will be very instable before depletion really sets in.


Can you clarify what you mean by demand peak?

This is what I believed in. Supply restraint before PO.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby khebab » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 15:03:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', '
')Can you clarify what you mean by demand peak?

This is what I believed in. Supply restraint before PO.

Simmons calls it "Peak Supply", demand is a runaway train and supply cannot keep up! At the same time, BP is saying that reserve growth has stalled last year so no new significant supply increase is expected.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby nth » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 12:15:08

Yes, for non-OPEC, the future looks bleak.
Even if demand stays the same, we are looking for OPEC to provide more and more oil.

How much oil does OPEC has?
I think it is stupid to depend on OPEC, and it seems the world leaders are just beginning to realize this.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: New Forecast

Unread postby JoeW » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 13:20:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'H')ere is a forecast based on data from the new BP review.

Hey, pup, I am interested in checking out the BP Review data for myself to try to model it. Can you provide a link?

Joe
User avatar
JoeW
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Pit of Despair
Top

Re: New Forecast

Unread postby khebab » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 13:24:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JoeW', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'H')ere is a forecast based on data from the new BP review.

Hey, pup, I am interested in checking out the BP Review data for myself to try to model it. Can you provide a link?

Joe

BP review
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Unread postby JoeW » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 15:44:49

I have downloaded the BP Review data and will work in my spare time to construct a production model based extrapolating the multi-year trend for each country. I am not yet sure how many years to include, but I think that five is a good baseline. That can be called the nominal case.

Then I will consider a 'best-case' scenario in which all countries who are still ramping up production continue their increases, and all countries in decline halt their decreases.

Then I will consider a 'worst-case' scenario in which all countries ramping up production are no longer able to do so, and all countries in decline continue to decline at their current rate.

This may take a few days.
User avatar
JoeW
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Pit of Despair

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 10:07:53

We welcome your input!

Kind of interesting, really. Also, some highbrow economists are doing just this sort of thing and charging $26,000 per report or something, so there is money in it.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Revised forecast

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 08:33:54

Let's revise the forecast based on the following news stories:

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic7006-0-asc-0.html
Cantarell and Mexico now in decline

Iraq

Iraq’s net production (excluding deliveries into storage and field re-injection) fell by 80 kb/d to
1.75 mb/d in May.

China
I used 9% growth in energy consumption, in the estimate below

Russia Decline

Russia declining slightly (0.2%)


Here is the new forecast:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', ' production consumption Gap
2005 81407.5 83253.8 1846.3
2006 83436.9 85941.3 2504.4
2007 85889.7 88835.1 2945.4
2008 88838.4 91952.5 3114.1')

The deficit will start this year, if these numbers are correct.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby pea-jay » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:36:49

These estimates all assume Ghawar doesn't collapse on us during this period right?
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:45:07

Of course. Saudi is estimated at 10.5 mbo/d and constant.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 19 Jul 2005, 13:43:26

Here are some updates to the forecast based on recent news reports:

Mexico: 6% depletion, 3824 mbd this year.
Norway: 7% depletion, 2964 mbd this year

China: 7% overall consumption growth, 6470 mbd
per this article:


Business Week ref by PO.com front page

The new forecast:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', ' production consumption Gap
2005 81373.7 82438.7 1065.0
2006 82995.1 84955.8 1960.7
2007 85037.1 87656.5 2619.5
2008 87553.7 90555.7 3002.0')

The shortfall could only be about 1 mbd which is roundoff error in this estimate. The gap grows by about 900 thousand barrels per day per year.

If china can cut its growth to 2% the following forecast results:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', ' production consumption Gap
2005 81373.7 82438.7 1065.0
2006 82995.1 84599.9 1604.9
2007 85037.1 86911.0 1874.0
2008 87553.7 89384.0 1830.3')

An average shortfall of 1 mbd is probably manageable by the system (thanks to inventory buffers, etc.) So, maybe if China is the "swing consumer" and will walk away from oil at 60 mbd, the system can marginally stay intact through 2008.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby chuck6877 » Tue 19 Jul 2005, 20:27:50

Pup,

Your assumptions don't take into account any new countries going into decline right?

Which countries should begin decline soon? Can you turn maybe 1 country per year into a decline and see the results then?

When do you think the worldwide Peak will occur?

Do you think ASPO's estimate of 2008 might be correct?

Chuck
User avatar
chuck6877
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby pup55 » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 12:46:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')our assumptions don't take into account any new countries going into decline right?


No, with the exception of Mexico and Norway.
This forecast assumes that the countries that are now growing will keep growing at the same rate, and the countries that are in decline will keep declining at the same rate for the next three years.

To bring everyone up to date, we made the following assumptions:
Saudi arabia: 10.5 mbd constant for the next three years
Iraq: 1.750 mbd constant for the next three years
Russia 9.285 mbd constant for the next three years
Mexico and Norway in depletion per the above
China consumption increases per the above
Consumption everywhere else increases at the same rate as it has been.
Everything else like it is in the most recent BP review

Yeah, we could easily test a scenario where country X goes into depletion and what would be the effects on the gap. Since the gap is about 1.5 mbpd, I can already tell you that the country will have to be pretty big in terms of oil consumption in order to make too much of a difference on "the gap", if you assume some normal depletion rate, such as 7%.

Here's an example:
Brazil is producing about 1.5 mbd. If it goes into 7% depletion, that's only a 100,000 bpd decrease.

So, you really have to look for one of the big oil-producing countries to go into depletion in order for it to have too much of an effect on this forecast.

The main candidates for this are Russia (9.200 mbd)Iran (4.2 mbd), and obviously Saudi (10.5) and China. (3.5 mbd)
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 23:51:40

I also started working on this. Going to make a semi official paper with production figures from every country until 2020 probably. (with a few scenario's)

Here are my preliminary figures until 2010:

As you can see in the most optimistic scenario (i took the production increases from the EIA country analysis) we can have 1% worldwide growth every year until 2010). Confirming Pup55's analysis. Also interesting to note is that even if Saudi Arabia would peak (with 8% decline rate) in 2005 there is no sharp drop, just a sort of plateau until russian production starts to drop too.

Image


Demand Gap in case of Business as usual

Image



Difference between scenario's:

Business as usual -->

Saudi Arabia 1 million barrels increase between 2005-2010 and Russian production steady as she goes.

Saudi Peak 2005 scenario includes a peak in 2005 with a decline rate of 8%.

Russia peak scenario includes a Saudi peak in 2005 with a decline rate of 8% and a Russian peak in 2008 with a decline rate of 8%.

Overall Model:

Depletion for UK is given as 7% each year
Depletion for Norway is given as 2% each year (from 2004 onwards)
Iraq stays about the same with 2 million barrels of production in 2010


New Peaks 2005-2010:

China 2005 --> 1% decline
India 2008 --> 3% decline
Denmark 2008 --> 2% decline
Malaysia 2006 --> 4% decline
Mexico 2005 --> 1% decline
Mexico 2006 --> 4% decline
Mexico 2007+ --> 8% decline

Major Increases (rounded and total of period 2005-2010):

Nigeria 1 million barrels
Iran 300.000 barrels
UAE 300.000 barrels
Libya 300.000 barrels
Kuwait 400.000 barrels
Canada 800.000 barrels
Brazil 500.000 barrels
Algeria 500.000 barrels
Angola 1.4 million barrels
Kazakhstan 1.6 million barrels


Total increase in supply = 11.383 million barrels
Total decline in supply = 5.500 million barrels
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Unread postby Taskforce_Unity » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 11:00:03

First Update:

OPEC production, based on BP Statistical review and EIA country analysis. (Plus some Simmons Saudi stuff but not that much)


Image
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Next

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron