by kublikhan » Tue 31 Jan 2012, 15:55:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', 'T')he parity gap can be closed in both directions. The cost of coal fired electricity is soaring due to heavy handed regulation by the Obama administration. Don't ask when the gap will close, ask what price we will be paying for the light bill when it closes.
Personally I am happy with the gap closing from both directions. Renewables are getting cheaper and fossil fuels are finally having some of their externalities factored into their cost. Plus there is the fact that cheap energy encourages waste. With expensive energy, the savings from negawatts add up much more quickly.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nano', 'B')ut it remains a flawed argument. If you ignore grid maintenance costs and taxes, than you are implying that we just let the grid rot, and that the lost tax income does not equal reduced government earning and hence reduced government spending or new taxes.
In the Netherlands, rather than the arrival of grid parity, what we are seeing is the arrival of stupidity and short-sightedness on the independent news service.
In my job as an energy systems specialist working for a mechanical engineering consultancy firm, I have commissioned many small and large PV systems. It turns out that even if the cost of solar panels goes to 0, then the cost of the construction and maintenance is at least 4 ct/kWh. That is far more than the cost of French nuclear power. Hence, I am confident that grid parity will *never* be reached in the Netherlands. Grid parity for wind energy, however, may be possible in my country, but it is nowhere near yet. The price of the windturbine would have be reduced by 50% to about €500/kW. I think it could be done.
I agree, the news report was stupid. It sounds like they were comparing the cost of the panels alone to the cost of everything on the grid side. That is comparing apples and oranges. In additional to the panels you have the cost of installation, inverters, delta arrestors, batteries, etc. All of that makes off grid much more expensive than grid cost.
Utility scale power will ALWAYS be cheaper than residential. They get cost benefits from economies of scale. That applies to renewables like solar and wind, just as it does to coal and nuclear(How much would it cost to build your own nuke plant in your backyard?). I don't see this as a bad thing though. Residents can still benefit from the utilities economies of scale for renewables if the utility chooses to install renewables on their end.