Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA/OR/

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA/OR/

Unread postby Narz » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 04:27:57

Hi all.

So, I was thinking of moving to Central Florida once our (my girlfriend and my) lease was up in February. But we've decided against it for various reasons.

But we don't want to stay in San Diego either (for various reasons) and we're thinking about Northern Cali, Oregon or Washington.

Ideally somewhere reasonably affordable (relatively), with decent public transport, farmer's markets, people who give a damn, not too much sprawl, etc. And since I've heard specificity breeds results, a Brazilian Ju Jitsu studio also (for self defense, health, another way to connect in the community, etc.).

I've moved around ALOT in my life and am wanting very much to settle down in the best possible area I can (again for various reasons, the main ones being relationships, sense of community and just the security of knowing I'm going to be in one place for awhile, come what may).

I feel lucky (though obviously not in some ways) to be alive in this unique time when a person can choose where he/she wants to be. I feel confident I can survive anywhere (at least until TSHTF) but I don't want to just survive, I want to put down roots and be around like-minded (though diverse) people.

And of course I'd like to be somewhere where I would have a reasonable chance at doing alright post-peak, nowhere too dry or with too much extremes in temperature.

Also, if anyone has any recommendations for good efficiency inns (motels where we can stay for a week or month while we find more perminant residency) in the area(s) you suggest that'd be friggin' awesome too.

Thanks all for your time! [smilie=thumbsup.gif]
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 10:10:45

Unfortunately, California, Oregon, and Washington are among the most expensive states in the nation. Good luck.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby MD » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 10:26:19

There is a problem at the core of progressive communities: They are expensive.
Until the highly efficient jevon's machine of mass-manufacturing crumbles away, this won't change.

There is a great community right down the road from me: Yellow Springs, Ohio.

That community has cohesively stood against suburbanism. You can live in the village and find every traditional variety of small town main street store still thriving.

The prices are very high, though.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby TorrKing » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 10:50:10

Though I am not from America, I don't understand why noone seems to opt for place like Wyoming, Montana and Alaska.

More wilderness and less people. Also, if it is like here, they should have more affordable land too.
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Narz » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 13:35:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Torjus', 'T')hough I am not from America, I don't understand why noone seems to opt for place like Wyoming, Montana and Alaska.

More wilderness and less people. Also, if it is like here, they should have more affordable land too.

Alaska and Montana are very cold and are the top two states for suicides. I don't know much about Wyoming.

Wilderness is great and mobs of people are undesirable but humans (especially myself and my SO, despite a couple years of semi-isolation) are social creatures and living off the land (as well as life satisfaction) is easier when you've got a crew with you (good people of course, having no friends beats deadbeat or flaky friends).

I can see how Alaska and/or Montana and/or Wyoming or North Dakota might be ideal for some personality types but probably not for me.

I would rather save money though and would be willing to co-house to save. I'd be willing too to consider areas other than those I listed but we only have a couple of weeks to figure things out.

Also, we've got a couple of cats and I made a commitment to myself not to abandon them or stick them with other people. Which limits the places we can stay somewhat (though I've stuck 'em into an efficiency inn once before when I was without a place for a month while in FL in early '05).

Anyway, thanks for the ideas so far & the luck, we'll need it.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby frankthetank » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 13:43:16

Wyoming is a freezing cold desert with the only source of water being up in the mtns. I once made the mistake of not checking the extended forecast for a trip up into the BigHorn Mtns in WY (middle of the state). We had to leave because they were calling for up to 18 inches of snow in the higher mtns (we were @ 9,000ft). This was June 23. Montana is probably a little better, except the east is flat like a pancake and the west is mountains. I'd probably rather take my chances in Kansas, atleast its warm!
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 14:19:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Torjus', 'T')hough I am not from America, I don't understand why no one seems to opt for places like Wyoming, Montana and Alaska.

More wilderness and less people. Also, if it is like here, they should have more affordable land too.


Actually, Torjus, Alaska is an incredibly expensive place to live, starting with the land (including rural land) and filtering right down through basics like milk and bread. Most products have to be shipped long, long distances.

Country places in Wyoming and Montana (and Idaho and most other Western states) are also horribly expensive for the most part. I knocked them off my list long ago.

The cold in these places would give Norway a run for its money. And Wyoming and Montana are terribly dry, as Frank noted. Vast portions of the US are virtual deserts (a bad omen for the post-PO future).

Except for some Alaskans, the people in these places tend to be very conservative and hostile to "outsiders" and to the sorts of ideas we POers hold dear.

Also, there are very few jobs in these areas, for those who need jobs.

I've made a considerable study of this, and the most affordable states for those wishing to establish a decent farmy place or move to a new one are (roughly in this order) Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Maine, Minnesota, and to some extent Texas and New Mexico (which are, of course, mostly dry).

Most of the other states are hopeless unless you're seriously rich, or they don't qualify for other reasons.

The only reason I'm in Virginia is that land here cost about $1000/acre when I bought my place in the 1980s; now it's about $10,000/acre.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby TorrKing » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:32:43

Norway isn't really that cold, at least not anymore. If the Gulf stream shuts down, I think we would surpass most of Alaska by a fair degree though.

What I would have done, if I didn't have a family, is to emigrate to Russia and move to Central or East Siberia. Virtually lawless, remote places to live undetected, abundant game etc...

Some Evenks even claim that Mammoths still walk in remote parts of the taiga.

Heaven! :lol:
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby topcat » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:55:11

We sure would like to find a place like the one Narz is looking for. Too bad that if that place does exist, then everybody would want to go there, making it no fun.

Narz -- Sure would not mide being back in central FL today! Sure it rains there but it usually doesn't get this cold and grey.

Heineken - Why did you rule out the Carolinia's?
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Loki » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 16:21:00

I would never use "cheap" and "Oregon" in the same sentence, especially when you throw in "progressive," which narrows your choices considerably. I don't think Washington is much better.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby KhanCEO » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 16:31:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Most of the other states are hopeless unless you're seriously rich, or they don't qualify for other reasons.


How rich? I got some money.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')he only reason I'm in Virginia is that land here cost about $1000/acre when I bought my place in the 1980s; now it's about $10,000/acre.


So how much would it cost to buy 20 acres in Oregon ?
KhanCEO
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu 11 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Near New Life Church =( U.S.

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby JustinFrankl » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:02:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KhanCEO', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Most of the other states are hopeless unless you're seriously rich, or they don't qualify for other reasons.


How rich? I got some money.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')he only reason I'm in Virginia is that land here cost about $1000/acre when I bought my place in the 1980s; now it's about $10,000/acre.


So how much would it cost to buy 20 acres in Oregon ?

A few web searches show
* 30 acres in Maupin, OR for $4.9M (70 mi E/SE of Portland)
* 228 acres in Hood River, OR, for $2.25M (50 mi E/NE of Portland)
* 39 acres near Shady Cove, OR for $129K (200 mi S of Portland)
* 26 acres near Wolf Creek, OR for $89K (225 mi S of Portland)
"We have seen the enemy, and he is us." -- Walt Kelly
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:17:00

I forgot to include Oklahoma and upper New York State in my (earlier) list of affordable states.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:20:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('topcat', '
')
Heineken - Why did you rule out the Carolinas?


Expensive, expensive, expensive. Especially NC.

Miserably hot and humid from May through September.

Rednecky to the max.

Bible Belt to the hilt.

In other words, a lot like Virginia. :(
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby gg3 » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:22:44

Another thing to beware of is the presence of religious extremists. Some of these can be worse than the Taliban, and in the event of a breakdown of the Federal government, locales would rapidly take off in their own directions.

You do not want to be living in an area ruled by people who believe the world was created 6,000 years ago and fossils are God's way of testing your faith.

All the more so if you're not conventionally religious (e.g. Buddhists, Pagans, atheists, etc.), if you're gay, etc.

Also consider the impact of climate change.

Me & mine are headed for Northern California. We have a sufficiently large group, people who can invest in land & infrastructure, and people with relevant engineering and agricultural and other skills needed to build community and contribute to the community-at-large in our chosen area.

For single individuals and small families, consider seriously joining up with others to pool resources. Humans survive best in groups.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:26:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KhanCEO', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Most of the other states are hopeless unless you're seriously rich, or they don't qualify for other reasons.


How rich? I got some money.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')he only reason I'm in Virginia is that land here cost about $1000/acre when I bought my place in the 1980s; now it's about $10,000/acre.


So how much would it cost to buy 20 acres in Oregon ?

A few web searches show
* 30 acres in Maupin, OR for $4.9M (70 mi E/SE of Portland)
* 228 acres in Hood River, OR, for $2.25M (50 mi E/NE of Portland)
* 39 acres near Shady Cove, OR for $129K (200 mi S of Portland)
* 26 acres near Wolf Creek, OR for $89K (225 mi S of Portland)


You get what you pay for. Cheap land is often a sea of stumps, or eroded gullies, or desert land, or swampland, or virtually inaccessible mountain heights on which you'd be lucky to grow weeds. (Or there are no decent jobs within 100 miles, so you'd better be financially independent unless you want to work in a vermiculite plant.) Beautiful, yes, but livable? The real bargains have practically vanished.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Zardoz » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:33:53

Check St. Joseph, Missouri. My home town. I visited it (first time back, ever) last spring. Phenomenally low RE prices. Nice enough place, but employment may not be easy.

It's about 50 miles north of the very cosmopolitan Kansas City.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:43:40

Missouri is high on my list for my final resting place. You get more bang for your buck there than practically anyplace else. E.g., an 80-acre farm with a pond and a nice house for $150,000.

"The economy" there must really suck.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Cheap, "progressive" communities in upstate CA

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 22:47:03

Well, it depends on how close to civilization you want to be.

I can get some nice rural land for $500 an acre in Vermont...but I'll be all alone for 10 miles...

It is impossible to find super cheap rural land within easy driving distance of a major city.

Why?

The suburbs have long ago filled in the green belts around most of the major urban areas.

I'm 20 miles from Boston but land is still $20,000+ an acre for a plot with decent road access and utilities.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Next

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron