Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Article: Pipeline leaks from LNG process

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Article: Pipeline leaks from LNG process

Unread postby SD_Scott » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 14:47:15

This article claims many pipline leaks from LNG. Appearently the liquifaction process changes the gas composition and ruins the seals in the pipeline. Ah shucks. http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/7/emw260790.htm
User avatar
SD_Scott
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu 09 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Around somewhere

Unread postby FoxV » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 15:56:27

ah shucks is right.

LNG is one of the reasons the EIA is (officialy) not worried about oil depletion.

Can anyone find a link to the original report
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby Cyrus » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 16:22:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')NG is one of the reasons the EIA is (officialy) not worried about oil depletion.


They must not read the "weekly petroleum report". Natural gas for the US is down 6.5% from last year I believe. Coupled with this leakage..... 8O....
User avatar
Cyrus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 25 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 17:46:27

Yep it takes a lot of energy to compress the gas to make LNG, and the gas is "not happy" being that compressed, it does weird things to seals etc. Hydrogen's even worse, in the form proposed to be used for the "hydrogen economy", it eats through seals and leaks like crazy. It's corrosive, gets through the tiniest leaks because the molecules are so small, and is a real nightmare to deal with. And, the energy stored in it is so small compared to gas and diesel, that instead of say one visit a day by a gas tanker truck to the local gas station, you'd have something like 10 visits a day by the hydrogen truck.

Time to get on our bikes!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby pea-jay » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:09:11

Here is the Washington Post article that started the discussion.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02372.html

The LNG Report conducted on behalf of the local utility (distribution) cites the supplied LNG as the source of the problems

Apparently the problems revolve around the heavier hydrocarbons. In LNG, those hydrocarbons, like propane are removed.

Here is the link:
http://www.washingtongas.com/library/ge ... ia_kit.cfm
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

LNG nonsense

Unread postby baldwincng » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 05:12:14

To make LNG you cool natural gas to minus 161 deg C. It is stored at very low pressure in insulated tanks.

When it reaches its market, the gas is pumped to high pressure(eg 75 bar), easy to do as its a liquid. The gas is then warmed up (can use sea water to do this) and it gthe oes into the gas grids, its then no different than any other gas. The idea that natural gas from LNG leaks more is nonsense!

Total energy cost of liquefaction, transport, re-gasification, is about 12%
User avatar
baldwincng
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat 16 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: LNG nonsense

Unread postby pea-jay » Fri 15 Jul 2005, 02:47:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('baldwincng', '
')The idea that natural gas from LNG leaks more is nonsense!


Sure. Then why is it triggering more leaks on the segment where it predominates and less so where it blends in with domestic gas. Read the report. Now just because it is slightly different at the molecular level doesnt mean that domestic gas utilities cannot adapt to the differences, given time to prepare.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Leakage nonsense

Unread postby baldwincng » Fri 15 Jul 2005, 04:38:17

Natural gas is 90% methane, the CH4 molecule, made 100 or more million years ago. Whether it comes to the consumer by pipeline or ship, its the same CH4 molecule.

The idea that some CH4 molecules leak more than others is utter nonsense. If there seem to be more leaks, there are a number of reasons:

1. Operation of network will have changed to accommodate the LNG supply, maybe there are higher pressures (= more leaks given gas mains are often >50 years old and made of iron with leaky joints)
2. The natural gas from LNG has odorant added to it to give it its smell. May be that a bit more has been added than the normal odorant (methane has no smell). Adding more odorant will cause more leaks to be reported.
3. Consumers may be more on the look out for leaks as a result of shock horror LNG publicity.

The pipeline system will not be actually leaking more, that is complete and utter nonsense!!
User avatar
baldwincng
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat 16 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Antimatter » Fri 15 Jul 2005, 05:09:16

Aren't the heavier hydrocarbons usually removed from domestic gas anyway? Ethane for chem. feedstock and propane/butane for bottled gas/LPG fuel? The NIMBY/BANANA brigade will run and fly with this.
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia


Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron