Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Article: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Article: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 17:19:41

‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he average energy consumption on earth is 56 kilowatt-hours per day per person. You can visualize this personal energy consumption in terms of light bulbs: 56 kilowatt-hours per day is the energy consumption of 56 ordinary 40-watt bulbs left switched on all the time. The world’s population density is roughly 50 people per square kilometer, or 0.4 square mile. Countries, of course, vary significantly around the world average.
That means such countries could match today’s power consumption if they covered, for example, 20 percent of their land with energy crops; or 4 percent of their land with wind farms; or 2 percent of their land with solar parks in the traditional Bavarian style; or 0.5 percent of their land with desert solar power stations (assuming they have desert).

nytimes
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby cipi604 » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 19:05:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'T')hat means such countries could match today’s power consumption if they covered, for example, 20 percent of their land with energy crops; or 4 percent of their land with wind farms; or 2 percent of their land with solar parks in the traditional Bavarian style; or 0.5 percent of their land with desert solar power stations (assuming they have desert). nytimes

Farming 20% of the entire surface of the country without using oil? out of the question windfarms need energy storage,max output just 10% of the time, permanent winds exist anywhere?! desert solar power stations need energy storage or else.
And don;t forget, you can;t farm, fly (intercontinental), send space rockets out there & many more just with electricity.
User avatar
cipi604
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 21:41:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', '[')b]‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he average energy consumption on earth is 56 kilowatt-hours per day per person. You can visualize this personal energy consumption in terms of light bulbs: 56 kilowatt-hours per day is the energy consumption of 56 ordinary 40-watt bulbs left switched on all the time..... countries could match today’s power consumption.....

This is a bit deceptive..... The average energy use on earth includes billions of people in Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Latin and South America who use almost no energy.
Your typical American uses much more. For instance, take Al Gore----he uses 605 KWh every day just in electricity......when you add in travel by car and private airplanes, and all the energy used on farms and in truck transport and store operation to supply the food to keep Al Gore going, a typical well-off american, concerned about energy use, still needs many many times energy then the global average would suggest.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby waegari » Wed 02 Sep 2009, 03:29:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cipi604', 'w')indfarms need energy storage,max output just 10% of the time, permanent winds exist anywhere?!

Not to mention the fact that wind farms are not ecologically neutral:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ind farms may also result in important changes in local climatology, potentially impacting, for example, agricultural interests located within and immediately around areas encompassed by wind farms. The turbulence induced by the propellers of wind turbines mixes air along with the heat and moisture it contains -- the effects can spread for miles around. This is especially true at night when the disturbed airflow is not masked by the natural turbulence caused by solar heating.

Based on computer modeling, researchers at Duke and Princeton universities found that wind mill-generated turbulence raised pre-dawn surface temperatures by about four degrees and resulted in drier soil conditions. Presumably, the surface warmth was largely the result of the mixed air preventing the settling of cold air at the surface, while the dryness reflected increased evaporation by the wind of soil moisture. This is not dissimilar to the more familiar experience of a windy night keeping temperatures from falling as low as might otherwise be expected and also drying out pavement made wet by an evening shower.

Washington Post: Can Wind Farms Change the Weather?

The more wind farms you build, the larger the influence on global temperatures. And weren't we already having a problem with those?..
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.

Al Bartlett
waegari
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby ian807 » Wed 02 Sep 2009, 11:49:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('waegari', 'N')ot to mention the fact that wind farms are not ecologically neutral:

The thing is, nothing is ecologically neutral. Every energy source has an impact. Solar radiation hitting a panel or mirror doesn't go to a plant. Windmills kill birds (although why screens aren't build around them is beyond me), dams destroy local river ecologies, nuclear plants suck up water, land and require energy intensive mining and oil based transportation to operate.

Even Native Americans modified their landscape through damming and burning. Today, everything that might produces enough energy to feed 6 billion requires transportation, mining for minerals, fabrication, and so on. The idea that we can have ecologically neutral anything is simply delusional.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby efarmer » Thu 03 Sep 2009, 09:38:57

"Great nations are simply the operating fronts of behind-the-scenes, vastly ambitious individuals who had become so effectively powerful because of their ability to remain invisible while operating behind the national scenery."
Buckminster Fuller

At some point we have to face facts. Our way of life in America and our peers is based on extremely wasteful exploits of energy and materials that embody energy. The illusion of civilization is only possible under this system until such time as easy energy and material exploits are exhausted. The past is littered with the burnt out hulls of Communism, Socialism, Nationalism, Theocracy, and Royalty. Capitalism is an exploit hull that consumes itself to where it just fails and lacks the fuel to burn out and join the legacy hulls. We have to synthesize a new system, or fade out.

The choice is how we intend to use the remaining ingredients we have to work with. The trend is to get the consumption engine running at high RPM again and give it a James Dean ending.

Our political arguments seem to be based on where the waste nozzle is aimed and delivers it's payload and not on any evolution of strategy.
We are still working with the principle of our first big discovery, fire.
We burn until it rains or we run out of fuel, but we have developed an unbelievably diverse set of cover stories and competing fantasies.

So tell me kids, do you want to burn and win, or think and worry?
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Thu 03 Sep 2009, 14:48:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'Y')our typical American uses much more. For instance, take Al Gore----he uses 605 KWh every day just in electricity......when you add in travel by car and private airplanes, and all the energy used on farms and in truck transport and store operation to supply the food to keep Al Gore going, a typical well-off american, concerned about energy use, still needs many many times energy then the global average would suggest.

I will mock and ignore Al Gore until he moves into a mud hut and only wears animals skins.

Then I will mock and ignore Al Gore because he lives in a mud hut and wears animals skins. SUCKER!

Am I with the program or what?
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: ‘Sustainable Energy -- Without The Hot Air

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Fri 04 Sep 2009, 13:25:36

[quote="article']Wind farms may also result in important changes in local climatology,
>potentially impacting, for example, agricultural interests located within
>and immediately around areas encompassed by wind farms. The turbulence
>induced by the propellers of wind turbines mixes air along with the heat
>and moisture it contains -- the effects can spread for miles around. This is
>especially true at night when the disturbed airflow is not masked by the
>natural turbulence caused by solar heating.[/quote]
This could be a huge benefit for fruit orchards that can have their crops wiped out by a late frost.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00


Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron