by Outcast_Searcher » Sat 03 Jul 2021, 15:08:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') think of JIT just as I do people who bring home dinner each night in a bag and have nothing in the cupboard but half a box of stale Sugar Pops. It works fine as long as everything else works fine. The problems come when there is a problem because there is no slack. Rather than the critical path jumping from one item/task to another, everything becomes critical.
An excellent point. And this is the problem with a huge proportion of "the poor" in the US. Many are not ACTUALLY poor, but they have terrible planning, and save NOTHING. Then when the first significant thing goes wrong (which in the real world is inevitable, like machinery breaking down, someone getting sick, etc). then it's a "disaster" with no funds to pay for a car repair of significance or a new refrigerator, much less several months' rent, etc.
And of course, the way to actually have a shot at FIXING that would have more to do with mandatory training in home economics, like in high school, than in shrieking at rich people. But of course, in the real world, politics often takes the front seat.
So there we are.
And before people yell at me too shrilly, I have actually tried to economically help and coach a number of "poor" people in the US, including contributing as much as $10,000 to their household budgets (like paying a year of rent when someone got sick) while I was trying to coach them in longer term thinking.
My success rate is zero percent. And perhaps it's all my fault, but in my career, in college, and in general re helping friends with finances, my success rate, re actually getting people to learn and practice things that helped them, is something along the lines of 75%, vs. zero percent, so I'm not buying that it's ALL MY FAULT, just because, re economics, I tend to think more like a conservative (like on personal responsibility and planning, for example) than most liberals, especially far left liberals. Even when my views on issues like abortion, education, sexual preference, religion, and many others, put me squarely in the liberal camp.
(And no, I'm not "confused" as I've been accused of being, but I look at issues one at a time, don't kowtow to left or right, and am willing to think for myself, so for THAT, if that is a "sin" I plead "no contest" on being guilty.)
Of course, since pops likely has me on "ignore" since I dared to disagree with him once (which he claimed made me an "ad hommer", he likely won't see this.
I'm sure that's my fault as well. /s

Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.