CIT to continue with Fed bailout. Not the best way to handle this, or least costly to the government in the long run, but keeps CIT out of the news.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1247618 ... od=testMod$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ULY 14, 2009, 8:58 P.M. ET.CIT, Regulators Negotiate Details of Multipart Aid Package
By SERENA NG, JEFFREY MCCRACKEN and DAMIAN PALETTA
CIT Group Inc. and federal regulators are working out details of an aid package designed to help the troubled lender resolve its deepening liquidity crisis, according to people familiar with the matter.
The outlines of the plan began to emerge late Tuesday as CIT's financial position deteriorated. Worried customers drew down on their credit lines on Monday and Tuesday, draining hundreds of millions of dollars from CIT, the people said.
Under the plan regulators would allow CIT to transfer assets from its holding company to its bank in Utah;
the Federal Reserve would let CIT pledge some of those assets at its discount window and the company would take steps to refinance some of its existing debt. The package is not yet finalized and it remains uncertain whether a deal can be struck.
The future of CIT's chief executive Jeffrey Peek is unclear, one person familiar with the talks said.
The financial position of CIT, a lender to almost a million small and midsize businesses, has weakened in recent days and government officials have come under increasing pressure to resolve the looming crisis. News over the weekend that the company hired lawyers to help prepare for a possible bankruptcy filing prompted nervous customers to draw down on credit lines and the company's bonds and stock slumped. People familiar with the matter put the drawdowns at several hundred million dollars; one said a number discussed by CIT's board ran as high as $775 million.
Officials remain split over how much help CIT should be offered and some feel that CIT could be trying to overhype the consequences of its potential collapse to scare Washington into action. There is also the risk that propping up CIT will reinforce the stigma that Washington will bail out companies that aren't even considered too big to fail. Still, officials know they face unknown ramifications if the company does collapse, and the economy is still in weak enough shape that it's unclear whether they are willing to take that risk.
Treasury officials appeared to be leading the negotiations, according to people familiar with the matter.
The asset transfers to CIT's bank would require approvals from the Fed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
The FDIC remains reluctant to give CIT access to a temporary program that allows banks and thrifts to issue debt with government backing. CIT late last year received approval to convert to a bank holding company and received $2.33 billion from the Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
One likely concern for regulators is how CIT can fund a steep rise in assets at its Utah bank. Part of the company's strategy is to aggressively seek out deposits through brokers, but the FDIC traditionally views such moves as higher risk, especially at companies that are struggling. It's unclear if the FDIC will sign off on such a strategy.
CIT's board, which has been meeting regularly in the past few days, met again late Tuesday with the hope of coming to a solution soon, said one person familiar with the matter.