by Tyler_JC » Thu 19 Feb 2009, 15:26:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesec9', 'O')h but wait, the video doesn't suggest going to a gold standard, saying it would be a mistake saying that those that control the fed already possess most of the gold out there. They instead advocate debt-free government notes issued by Congress instead of a privately owned central bank. Like Lincoln's greenbacks. Apparently when that debt-free currency existed, the economy was so good that the corporations were able to finance capital expenditures out of their own cash reserves rather than debt financing. No wonder the bankers wanted to do away with that.
The way they are saying it in this video however is that the Fed purposefully deflated the currency to cause the GD. I am skeptical of that. But still, so much of the video is entirely true, I just can't bring myself to believe some of the details of it. But then again maybe the "money changers" really are that evil.
Ron Paul supported the gold standard but I am skeptical about it because gold is very rare and the inflation/deflation rate would be determined by supply and demand, which can distort the money supply whenever discoveries are made or there are shortages.
And if the government had the power to print debt-free money...how much money would they print?
Any time a Populist government has the opportunity to print its own currency, it does so with reckless abandon.

Do you really want Nancy Pelosi deciding how much money we should print?
The choice is between an independent central bank and a publicly accountable central bank. An independent central bank results in a statistically significant reduction in inflation and increase in overall monetary stability.
A publicly accountable central bank results in rampant and out of control inflation.
The currencies that we like to think of as stable, the Swiss Franc and German Deutsche Mark, were stable
because they were independent and free from popular interference.