by MrBill » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 05:05:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll other wealth stems from that basic building block. The agricultural surplus is created by and supports labor.
continued
Labor is our basic unit of wealth. The cost of labor is zero. Wealth is created when that labor is used to create something of value. Something that someone else is willing to pay for with their own labor. Money is a scorecard for keeping track of who owes what to whom, and as a medium of exchange. It is also useful for price discovery.
The reason I said that the cost of labor is zero is that it has no intrinsic value and it is a wasting asset.
Of course, labor relies on the input of calories. If labor only produces as many calories as it needs to survive, but otherwise does nothing productive with that labor, then no wealth is created except feces.
Eating and sleeping in order to get up and deficate uses calories, but it alone produces nothing of value. So that potential labor expires worthless.
And a laborer, for example, cannot practically pay himself for his own labor. He can build or grow something of value. But he cannot, for example, pay himself $10 per hour to work for himself.
Therefore, labor has to grow enough calories for support itself. An agricultural surplus. And then trade its excess labor by building or growing something else of value.
The limits of the barter economy are that many of the tasks that we do have become highly specialized. A high degree of specialization has made us highly productive. High productivity has lowered costs while increasing output. Lower costs and increased output have raised living standards.
The secondary and tertiary economies still rely on the primary economy, but the primary economy as a percentage of the total economy have shrunk. Or the 10% of the economy that allows the other 90% to function if you will. But because many of those specialized tasks are hard to value they do not lend themselves well to barter.
It is very hard to trade a cabbage for all the land, labor, capital and technical expertise that it takes to explore, drill, extract, transport, refine and distribute petroleum products or those alternate sources of energy that might someday replace fossil fuels.
The difficulty of trading a cabbage for usable solar panels consisting of many manufactured parts themselves composed of materials that must be mined, processed and assembled using skilled labor should be plain to anyone that thinks seriously about it. How does one practically pay for freight delivered via rail using a cabbage when that train is part of a supply chain stretching over hundreds or thousands of miles? The answer is that if money did not exist, we would have to invent it.
The truth is that due to post peak oil resource depletion we will likely value land, labor, capital and technical know-how quite differently than we do now. Energy may become worth more relative to labor. Excess capital or deployable wealth may become scarcer and therefore more valuable. That wealth may well not be in the form of dollars or any other fiat currency per se, but may be in the form of grain or gold or some other medium of exchange that facilitates trade and investment. Stores of value.
But the market economy will still be functioning as a means of converting our land, labor, capital and technical know-how into usable products to meet our everyday needs for food, shelter, security, heat, clean water and sanitation, education or whatever else we can afford to produce and place economic or social value upon. Our wants.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.