Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

$90 oil deflationary?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

$90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby heroineworshipper » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 18:32:33

CNN wrote:
> with oil prices now retreating below $90 a barrel after
> flirting with $100, the market - and Fed - probably has
> even less reason to worry about inflation

Bet U didn't expect $90 oil to be deflationary, but with a ponderous flood of newly printed money keeping housing afloat, now it is.
User avatar
heroineworshipper
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri 14 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Calif*

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Micki » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 21:37:08

The central banks have successfully sold the concept that high prices are inflationary so that no blame would be cast on the money printers.

Oil price isn't inflationary or deflationary, it is however to some degree the symptom of inflation/deflation.

When the total money supply increases this will show up in higer prices of goods as more money compete to buy stuff and the other way around for contracting money supply.

If the amount of money in circulation doesn't change and there is an increase in oil price, this will be offset by less spending elsewhere and therefore isn't inflationary. (Same thing of course applies to items that increase in cost as a result of higer oil price.)

Lowering of oil price when amount of money in circulation remains constant, would result either in increased savings or increased spending on other items (or just more purchase of oil/pretrol).

Money being saved instead of spent would of course show up as negative in the consumer discretionary sector, but the banks/financial institutions would use that money for investments that most likely generate the spending elsewhere.
Micki
 

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby patrick_b » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 04:37:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('heroineworshipper', 'C')NN wrote:
> with oil prices now retreating below $90 a barrel after
> flirting with $100, the market - and Fed - probably has
> even less reason to worry about inflation

Bet U didn't expect $90 oil to be deflationary, but with a ponderous flood of newly printed money keeping housing afloat, now it is.


I don't think this pullback in prices has anything to do with inflation or deflation on such a short term... It is much more likely to be the usual seasonal variations of oil prices. Most people should already have filled their tanks of heating oil and this is why demand goes temporarily down...
User avatar
patrick_b
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon 11 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 12:23:40

I've come to the conclusion that the world economy has a collective fear of the unknown. The Chinese don't want to contemplate what will happen if they slip below a 7% annual growth rate. To a lesser degree, the rest of the worlds exporters are in the same boat. It's fear of the unknown that keeps the debt monetization going and if it keeps going like it is, we will have deflation. Why? Because the US right now has a credit crunch internally. People are struggling under the mountain of huge monthly mortgage payments. The housing industry, a huge source of jobs in the modern US economy, is faltering. Commodities, such as oil, are becoming more expensive. The obvious result is that American households will keep on tightening and demand reduction will be the result. Even with a severely depreciated currency, Americans are finding it difficult to buy things at cut-rate prices. It's getting to the point that it doesn't matter how cheap it is, if your really don't need it to survive, which is the case with most imported manufactured products, then you don't buy it and save your money for your debt payments.

I think we are heading for a worldwide recession which will include deflation of all prices. We still aren't past peak oil production, obviously supply still meets demand. Once we're on that down slope, however...
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Micki » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 20:07:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'ve come to the conclusion that the world economy has a collective fear of the unknown. The Chinese don't want to contemplate what will happen if they slip below a 7% annual growth rate. To a lesser degree, the rest of the worlds exporters are in the same boat. It's fear of the unknown that keeps the debt monetization going and if it keeps going like it is, we will have deflation. Why? Because the US right now has a credit crunch internally. People are struggling under the mountain of huge monthly mortgage payments. The housing industry, a huge source of jobs in the modern US economy, is faltering. Commodities, such as oil, are becoming more expensive.


So what about Weimar where stamp prices went from a mark to 1 billion marks? What about Zimbawe that has 10,000% inflation now. Why couldn't other countires have that and you suggest there must be an outright deflation.
Interest rates can still be lowered, government can come up with aid programs (or take on mortages), we can see wage increases as a result of higher costs we can have a mad central banker throwing money out of choppers...
I am firmly in the stagflaiton camp. Prices keep going up, debt being monetized, people can only afford necessities. Money will be spent on necessities and not on holidays, decorative items, extra soft toilet paper and less and less on anything imported.
At some point this crashes, but comparing with other inflationary scenarios, I think the battle only has begun.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e still aren't past peak oil production, obviously supply still meets demand. Once we're on that down slope, however...
What????? Supply meeting demand is not part of the peak oil theory. According to your definition if supply goes down but demand goes down even more PO has not been passed (???)
Supply/demand is relative, production figures are hard and fast. So far production figures show tha PO has been passed for conventional oil UNLESS new production comes online that not only offsets declines but also takes the production rate past previous maximum output. Don't mix up peak oil (peak in production rate) with the EFFECTS of peak oil.
Micki
 

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 20:20:49

Demand has gone up and so has supply. Believe me, I lived through the oil embargos of the 70's and 80's, I can still go to any gas station at any time and buy gas. You couldn't do that back then. Gas stations were running out of gas, that's what I'm talking about. While I might concead that we probably have peaked on higher grades of crude, I don't think that we've peaked yet overall.

When talking about inflation/deflation, I'm only concidering the US. China is going full steam, manufacturing like crazy and building more factories. If demand goes down, they will start practically giving the crap away - that's the only model they know.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Temperedoil » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 20:38:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', ' ')We still aren't past peak oil production, obviously supply still meets demand. Once we're on that down slope, however...


According to the numbers and graphs that are available through such organisations as the IEA and EIA, crude oil production does appear to now be on a plateau, with consumption increasing. Crude oil production appears to be less than consumption, on a global basis. Global supply, on the other hand, is so far keeping up with demand in the wealthier nations of the world.

There are a number of other threads on these boards looking into why this might be happening. Suggested reasons include drawdowns on emergency reserves; poorer nations not being able to afford their share of supply, leading to a greater share for the rest of us; the addition of natural gas liquids, tar sand oil, and other non-conventionals.

Although there remains some debate over when peak has been or will be reached, the numbers would appear to suggest at this point that the peak is indeed behind us now.
Temperedoil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 13:22:25

I agree that we are probably AT peak, but not POST peak. The theory holds that we can remain on the plateau for several years. However, once we reach the down slope, it will become very apparent. The argument will be over.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Doly » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 15:59:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he theory holds that we can remain on the plateau for several years. However, once we reach the down slope, it will become very apparent.


Reality is seldom that neat and tidy. People may speak in the future of a plateau and a slope, but do you really think the plateau is going to be perfectly flat and the slope perfectly downwards?
What are you doing about peak oil?
I am doing this
(click on the www button) v
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby Kingcoal » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 16:29:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he theory holds that we can remain on the plateau for several years. However, once we reach the down slope, it will become very apparent.


Reality is seldom that neat and tidy. People may speak in the future of a plateau and a slope, but do you really think the plateau is going to be perfectly flat and the slope perfectly downwards?


Yes, when averaged together, world oil production looks like a bell curve. I'm not sure of what point you are trying to make. Are you saying that we should just quit trying to model oil production?
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Top

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 23:08:54

I think the price of gasoline is being kept artificially low. Once whatever function this is fulfilling has passed, I expect prices to rise once again.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby joewp » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 00:51:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'I') think the price of gasoline is being kept artificially low. Once whatever function this is fulfilling has passed, I expect prices to rise once again.


Then watch out after Christmas is over. :?
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida
Top

Re: $90 oil deflationary?

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 11:39:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('heroineworshipper', 'C')NN wrote:
> with oil prices now retreating below $90 a barrel after
> flirting with $100, the market - and Fed - probably has
> even less reason to worry about inflation

Bet U didn't expect $90 oil to be deflationary, but with a ponderous flood of newly printed money keeping housing afloat, now it is.



Inflation is inflation. Deflation is deflation. Falling inflation is not deflation. Falling prices are not deflation.

As Micki correctly points out, inflation - and therefore deflation - have everything to do with money supply growth relative to growth in the real economy.

If money supply growth is constant then high energy prices will be offset by lower spending elsewhere in the economy.

Inflation occurs when high energy prices are offset by faster money supply growth. And correspondingly, deflation would occur if you had high energy prices and money supply was shrinking.

That is not the case at the moment. We have high energy prices and money supply growth in excess of real growth in the economy, so it is naturally inflationary!

I will post this piece by Caroline Baum. She probably explains it better than I can. Thanks.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
Good cheer and glad tidings are in short supply right now in the corridors of the world's central banks.

Policy makers in the industrialized world face the growing prospect of slower growth and higher inflation, at least higher reported inflation from the acceleration in energy and food prices.

Inflation is a lagging indicator. Credit events are deflationary. The constriction of the credit channel will eventually lead to lower inflation. In the meantime, central banks can look forward to a holiday season of bad numbers and rising inflation expectations.

Let's start with that last bastion of monetarism, the European Central Bank. The ECB has become one of the more transparent central banks, something that becomes obvious to anyone visiting its Web site. Go to the ECB home page, click on ``Monetary Policy,'' then on ``Strategy,'' and read about the bank's ``two-pillar approach'' to policy. (While you're in the neighborhood, don't miss the nifty flow chart on the transmission mechanism of monetary policy.)

Pillar one is economic analysis, which focuses on real activity and financial conditions. Asset prices also get a mention, which separates the ECB from the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Pillar two is monetary analysis, which ``exploits the long- run link between money and prices.'' Over time, too much of the first causes a rise in the second. The ECB defines price stability as a year-on-year inflation rate of less than 2 percent in the medium term.

That Nagging Equation

So how's the ECB doing, as former New York City Mayor Ed Koch was wont to ask his constituents. Inflation in the 13-member euro zone touched 3.1 percent in November, the highest in 6 1/2 years. The core measure, which excludes food, alcohol and tobacco, is up 1.9 percent in the last 12 months. The Europeans don't do much coring when it comes to inflation.

Real gross domestic product growth in the euro zone has averaged 2.7 percent in the last two years. Here's where the second pillar comes in.

The ECB doesn't place a priority on the monetary aggregates because another line item looks good on the Web site. There is a long-run link between money and prices expressed as the equation of exchange, or MV=PY, where M is money, V is velocity (the rate at which money turns over), P is prices and Y is output, or GDP. What that means is over time, assuming velocity is constant, nominal growth in the money supply equals nominal GDP.

Money Pipeline

Oops. M3, the broad monetary aggregate favored by the ECB, rose 12.3 percent in October from a year earlier. There's a big gap -- and a lot of potential inflation -- between real growth of 2.7 percent and nominal money growth of 12.3 percent. No wonder ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said on Dec. 6 that the two options for the ECB were raising rates or holding them steady. The ECB's benchmark rate has been at 4 percent since June, double what it was two years ago.

Across the pond, the Fed is in an unenviable position as well. It doesn't have two pillars; it doesn't even have a post. What it has is a dual mandate (maximum employment and price stability), an implicit inflation target of 1 percent to 2 percent on a price index for consumer purchases excluding food and energy, and some bad inflation news.

Friday the U.S. Labor Department reported that the CPI rose 4.3 percent in November from a year earlier and 2.3 percent excluding food and energy. In a tacit acknowledgment that energy prices have gone one way (up) for seven of the last eight years and food prices haven't fallen on an annual basis in at least 40, the Fed is now releasing quarterly forecasts for overall and core inflation.

Zero Return?

With 10-year Treasury notes yielding 4.23 percent, less than current inflation, the Fed can take comfort in the fact that investors don't expect today's rate of inflation to persist over the life of the notes.

The bad news is five-year inflation expectations five years from now crept higher last week following a coordinated effort to address banks' short-term funding needs and encourage them to make loans. The Fed announced a term auction facility to provide collateralized loans to depository institutions for a month at a rate determined by bid. The ECB, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Canada will offer similar facilities to provide dollar liquidity pursuant to an increase in their swap lines with the Fed.

Like the ECB, the BOE has an inflation target of 2 percent. Unlike its European counterpart, it lowered its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to 5.5 percent on Dec. 6. A week earlier, BOE Governor Mervyn King was fretting over faster inflation.


No Ho-Ho

U.K. policy makers expect economic growth to slow as falling home prices and tighter lending conditions conspire to sap what has been a fast-growing U.K. economy.

Inflation is running at 2.1 percent. Ten-year inflation expectations have drifted higher over the last couple of years to 3.23 percent, suggesting investors don't agree with the BOE's assessment that this month's rate cut ``was necessary to meet the 2 percent target for CPI inflation in the medium term.''

The deterioration in financial market conditions and credit constraints threatening economic growth require the balm of lower interest rates. If central banks can pull it off without igniting inflation or another asset bubble it's sure to bring tidings of comfort and joy.

Source: Commentary by Caroline Baum
Dec. 17 (Bloomberg)

As she points out it is not entirely an American phenomenon, but a global malaise! But she does write well, eh? ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron