Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Do the American people know what they're missing?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Do the American people know what they're missing?

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 23:44:12

By Sam Smith

Which American political party best reflects the views of a majority of citizens on the Iraq war, environmental issues, health care, campaign financing, population growth, genetically modified foods, and marijuana use?

The answer, based on various polls, is the Green Party.

That you may not be aware of this points to a problem with American journalism far more important than plagiarism, blogs, or Fox News. Specifically, our media - for all its professed objectivity - is stunningly biased towards the views of the American elite and particularly those who buy space in their papers or time on their channels.

On the environmental issue alone, the Green Party has been proven by the latest scientific data far more prescient and sane than either of the older parties. Yet the media prefers to dismiss, discredit or disregard the Greens as well as leaders who share their views, such as David Cobb or Ralph Nader.

http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue8/Sam_Smith.cfm

----------------------------------------------------------

I've been a registered Green for a few years now but I haven't been involved with them in any way except by voting (David Cobb protest vote).
They don't seem very well organized or sure of themselves frankly. Anybody else here a Green?

Next month, I'm going to my first Green social get together to see what sort of people they are. I wonder if any of them will know all abot Peak Oil and it's exponents.
Carlhole
 

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:04:41

I have to lean towards [no]
Socialism doesnt work. That might be why people dont look to the Green Party.

Differences
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Do the American people know what they're missing?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:25:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')Next month, I'm going to my first Green social get together to see what sort of people they are. I wonder if any of them will know all abot Peak Oil and it's exponents.
By all means go to the meeting and hopefully you'll report back to us on the impressions you get. I'd love to hear it. And specop, both of our main parties have been moving in the socialist direction anyway. The Republicans seem to be the 'let's take this Socialism thing in a slow and measured way party and the Democrats seem to be the 'hell, let's just get it over with and go Socialist' party. The move to Socialism is about to get a big push by the coming economic emergency. The cry will be 'the Market failed us! Socialism Now! Its the only thing that will save our bacon.' Maybe if we are going to go Socialist anyway we should all take a close look at third parties and see what our options are. The main parties are corrupt, the MSM is corrupt, the whole situation is rotten to the core. And third party options may gain strength when we head into the New Depression. (if that phrase catches on, then you heard it here first!)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:28:09

I'll have to agree PMS. We're pretty much screwed to walk the failing path of Socialism/Communism. :(

Fortunately, if we do go down that path hopefully we'll fall flat on our asses quickly enough to rebound and end up better off then before.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

i'm a green

Unread postby freelight » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:29:09

i'm against the drug war, against the war in iraq, for conservation, for renewables, against the bush admin. and the patriot act and aLL that. but i don't always vote green. i've been to a few green rally's but you are right - unorganized and not on the ball. i open my big mouth about these issues all the time, but not in terms of which party supports what. I think the green party has 0 esteem, and i'm counting on things getting real bad before we see some meaningful change. it's only then that the rest will come around.
User avatar
freelight
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:50:09

Specop, In your dreams you'll ever end up in a comparable Socialist Utopia, like Scandinavia. In the event of a crisis, you're going full bore fascist. (unless you consider debtor's work camps, part of a sissified Socialist nanny state)

Who says the Greens are particularly commie anyway? Perhaps communitarian. If the Greens were in power perhaps your tax dollars would actually be converted into something that you might benefit from.

What's it going to be? --a shot in the arm to halliburton, or universal health care? Or is the thought of benevolent domestic activity, as opposed to foreign wars somehow repulsive?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:52:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'S')pecop, In your dreams you'll ever end up in a comparable Socialist Utopia, like Scandinavia. In the event of a crisis, you're going full bore fascist. (unless you consider debtor's work camps, part of a sissified Socialist nanny state)

Who says the Greens are particularly commie anyway? Perhaps communitarian. If the Greens were in power perhaps your tax dollars would actually be converted into something that you might benefit from.

What's it going to be? --a shot in the arm to halliburton, or universal health care? Or is the thought of benevolent domestic activity, as opposed to foreign wars somehow repulsive?


Universal Healthcare will kill us. It may very well work for other countries, but for us it'll be a death sentence. I hope to hell it never passes here.
In most countries, Socialism/Communism has failed miserably. In those countries where it is perhaps working there certainly not what I would call a player on the world stage to any real degree.

Fact is, Socialism is for the lazy. I couldnt, in good faith, support a system that supports laziness and half assed work ethics.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:57:29

Let's de-socialize the military!!

Why keep everything else private except for that?

America spent nearly $500 billion on it last year. If we allow this to continue, why we'll be completely Red in no time!
Carlhole
 

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:09:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')(unless you consider debtor's work camps, part of a sissified Socialist nanny state)

debtor's work camps! 8O I need about one more good year to get completely out of debt. The restaraunt will probably go under because the days of getting on the phone and having some nice man bring your food to you will go the way of cheap gas. So I'll have to get by on the substitute teacher's pay. Ride an electric scooter to work and weather the storm, hopefully. But it'll mean having to have the credit cards paid off is essential before TSHTF. No 'gettin' water boss!' for me thank you.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby aldente » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:16:50

In Germany, where I am from there is the option for parties to form coalitions. I voted Green when I was around (did travel a lot and was never a frequent voter). Nevertheless, in 2002 the socialist Party SPD formed a coalition with the greens (who I voted for then) and won but guess what?

They are in the process to be voted out right now - pre term. Not because the coalition was the problem but the current economic situation. If the conservatives would be in charge (big mistake to think that political parties are "in charge" in the first place) it would not be different I believe.

On one hand one is to belive that political systems have a major impact on our livestyle (North-vs. South Korea for instance) then again these examples are the main selling points for a population to buy into the belive that they live in the best of all worlds (in the western world a least)

BTW. There was a one hour narrative aired on KPFK Pacifica LA today with Gore Vidal speaking. Just outstanding. He called the Bush/Cheney administration a "junta" and made the point that the US constitution never mentioned a word of democracy. The United States are simply a republic (and an empire these days).

But who cares about political systems in a few years anyway? They will be remnants of the past...
Image
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:23:18

excerpt from China: the Gathering Threat

Deficits Don’t Matter?

China’s bid to buy an American oil company coupled with America’s invasion of Iraq is perversely ironic. Normally it is the capitalistic country that seeks to buy out its adversaries and the communist country that commits territorial aggression to secure vital natural resources. The role reversal may be something of an indication of things to come. China is awash in hard currency and U.S. Treasury bonds thanks to the Bush Administration’s policies of borrowing to pay for tax cuts, military adventures, and a giant prescription benefit for the elderly (and to pay for the money China is lending us each American born today owes China $150,000 according to some estimates).

As the creditor China is likely to use its leverage to acquire American assets that will help accomplish its strategic goals. If current trends continue its just possible China will prove Marx and Lenin right after all: that capitalists would sell the hangman the rope necessary for their own execution.

http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modu ... e&sid=1105
Carlhole
 

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:23:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('albente', '
')If the conservatives would be in charge (big mistake to think that political parties are "in charge" in the first place) it would not be different I believe.

But who cares about political systems in a few years anyway? They will be remnants of the past...
Good point. Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. A third party here in the US would probably just be Tweedle Dummer. But I would like to hear Carlhole's impressions of the Greenies.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:28:32

I wish the Greens would run with this post-carbon/sustainability idea. It's got everything going for it including the price of gas and global warming. It could be a Euro-American or even a worldwide party, too.
Carlhole
 

Unread postby OilsNotWell » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:30:53

The Libertarian Party might stand a better chance if there was a recognizable 'name'...

The US has had many political parties over the years...the Federalist, Whigs, No-Nothings, Commnunists, Worker's, Perot's party (what was that called again? Oh, yeah the Reform Party)...

They come and go, change, morph...it's a good bet they'll continue to do so...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')urrent major parties
Democratic Party, founded circa 1828
Republican Party, founded 1854
See also: Current political party strength in U.S. states


Current third parties
Each of these three (along with the Democratic and Republican) parties had ballot status for its presidential candidate in states with enough electoral votes to have had a theoretical chance of winning the 2004 presidential election. The Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican parties have already met this threshold for the 2008 election. The Constitution and Green parties are the only other parties that appear to have a reasonable chance of doing so.

Constitution Party
Green Party
Libertarian Party

Current minor and regional parties that have endorsed candidates
These parties do not have ballot status for their presidential candidate in enough states to have a theoretical chance to win. Some do not have presidential candidates at all, but do have candidates for other offices.

Alaskan Independence Party
Aloha Aina Party
America First Party
American Heritage Party
American Independent Party
American Nazi Party
American Party
American Reform Party
American Patriot Party
Charter Party of Cincinnati, Ohio
Communist Party USA
Conservative Party of New Jersey
Conservative Party of New York State
Constitutional Action Party
Covenant Party (Northern Mariana Islands)
Falconist Party
Family Values Party
Freedom Socialist Party
Grassroots Party
Greens/Green Party USA
Independence Party of Minnesota
Independent American Party
Independent Citizens Movement (US Virgin Islands)
Labor Party
Liberal Party (New York State)
Liberty Union Party (Vermont)
Light Party
Marijuana Party
Mountain Party (West Virginia)
Natural Law Party
New Party
New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico
New Union Party
New York State Right to Life Party
Peace and Freedom Party
Personal Choice Party
Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico
Populist Party (Nader 2004-affiliated, unrelated to earlier so-named parties)
Progressive Party (Vermont)
Prohibition Party
Puerto Rican Independence Party
Reform Party
Republican Moderate Party (Alaska)
Revolutionary Communist Party
Socialist Action
Socialist Alternative
Socialist Equality Party
Socialist Labor Party
Socialist Party USA
Socialist Workers Party
Southern Party
Southern Independence Party
Spartacist League
United Citizens Party
U.S. Pacifist Party
We the People Party
Workers World Party
Working Families Party
Workers Party, USA
World Socialist Party of the United States
[edit]


Historical political parties
The following are parties listed by era that are no longer functioning entities.


Pre-Constitution
Anti-Federalist Party
Federalist Party
[edit]
Pre-Jackson
Democratic-Republican Party (also known as "Anti-Federalist", "Jeffersonian", "Jacksonian" or simply "Republican")
Federalist Party (although this party effectively dissolved after the Hartford convention)
[edit]
Jacksonian Era
National Republican
Whig
Anti-Masonic
[edit]
Antebellum
Constitutional Union Party
Free Soil
Know-Nothing Party (officially called the American Party)
Liberty Party
National Union Party (of USA) party formed for 1864 election combining Republicans and those from other parties allied with Lincoln (like VP candidate Andrew Johnson, a Democrat from Tennessee).
[edit]
Gilded Age
Liberal Republican Party
Greenback
Home Rule Party of Hawaii (created to serve the native Hawaiian agenda in the state legislature and U.S. Congress)
Populist
[edit]
Progressive Era
Farmer-Labor Party
Fusion Party (not an actual party, but a multi-party voting method used primarily in northern states)
National Woman's Party
Non-Partisan League (Not a party in the technical sense)
Progressive (including the "Bull Moose" party)
Social Democratic Party
Socialist Party of America
[edit]
Great Depression
American Labor Party
Union Party
[edit]
1940s
America First Party, whose peak came in 1944 and is not affiliated with the current America First Party
Dixiecrat (also known as States' Rights Democratic)
[edit]
Later 20th century
American Independent Party: the party under Alabama Governor George Wallace in the 1968 and 1972 elections
Citizens Party (1980-1984)
Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party
New Alliance Party/National Alliance Party
Puerto Rican Renewal Party (mid 1980s)
Puerto Rican Socialist Party (1970s-1980s)
User avatar
OilsNotWell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 04:39:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nybody else here a Green?


I'm close.

I'm a cross between a libertarian and a green on political issues, some will say I'm a bit out there.

Unlike the greens, I think more taxes and all this political correctness BS along with gun restrictions is a bad idea.

Unlike the libertarians, corporate personhood without giving corporations the responsibilities and liabilities of individual people and then proceeding to give them more leeway is also a bad idea. NAFTA, WTO, and similar legislation along with support of this bogus 'free trade' that completely discounts the employees, consumers, and communities affected by this 'free trade' from its decisions is hardly free.

Overall, I agree with fully open borders, getting rid of the PATRIOT Act and Homeland Security Department, dismantling the FBI, NSA, CIA, DEA, ect., passing a balanced budget amendment to the constitution, getting rid of all firearm restrictions, pulling out of Iraq, cutting all funding to the U.N. and pulling out of its treaties and membership, cutting the federal budget by 1/4 and passing a massive tax cut starting from the bottom up after the saved money pays off the national debt, liquidating the assets of the politicians that tampered with the social security lockbox and corporations that were given handouts from it, instituting a living wage that varies by region, providing government based jobs for building renewable energy infrastructure, a government healthcare system that offers healthcare at a zero profit level and free to those who can't afford it that competes with the private industry, removing all corporate subsidies and welfare, taxing pollution from point of generation in regards to industry, removing all constitutional rights from corporations and reserving them only for individual people(The way it was meant to be as Jefferson warned us.), passing measures to install public transit and bike lanes in our cities to lower automobile usage, and passing a measure that will end encroachment on our wilderness.

Some will say that not all of this is possible. And they are right if you attempt to institute all of these measures at the same time while lowering taxes. However, careful planning and allocation of money could make it possible. Won't happen though, too many people dead set against changing today's business as usual.

Corporate welfare: $200 billion/year
Iraq War: $80 billion/year
War on Drugs: $40 billion/year
Homeland Security Department: $40 billion/year
National Debt Interest: $300 billion/year
Defense Budget: $400 billion a year(25% of it is completely unaccounted for)

Some of these items overlap, some corporate welfare involved with the drug war and defense spending and Iraq War. But all of these things have waste. Cutting out all of these and cutting the defense budget to $50 billion could easily save $500 billion before the national debt interest is touched. Freeze the national debt interests just enough to keep up with inflation and freeze the assets held and begin to promptly pay them off with that surplus over 20 years while keeping $150 billion a year to employ people to construct wind turbines and other renewable energy schemes at a zero profit level. Once national debt is paid and well after the renewable energy is implemented, huge ass tax cut from the bottom up, $200 billion for healthcare.

On top of that, any weapon the government would be allowed to own, so too would the citizens. If the government doesn't want people drivinging around with nuclear warheads in their cars? Well looks like the government would have to ban themselves from having them! Want to own an Alliant Tech Systems OICW? I'd prefer for ownership to be legal thank you very much.

Yeah, I know. Won't never happen but one could wish...
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 04:40:30

Let's see if I have this right, the National Socialist Green Libertarian Party!!

www.nazi.org

I probably mixed it up though lol.

Motto: "Are we coming, or going? Hey! Lunchtime! Lentils again?"
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 05:38:29

I'm not at all nazi and only have a small piece of socialist in me. I've always thought of that party as some sort of joke, but I was surprised to learn there are members that take it seriously.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 06:17:56

I think that party MUST be a joke, somewhere a graduate student (or maybe an undergrad but it's too streight-faced, played too streight to be most undergrads) is giggling.......

And I did flub the name, got the "libertarian" and "socialist" and all that in the wrong order.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 06:28:31

As long as we're talking Nazis, I think society would be much nicer if everyone were brilliantly intelligent, incredibly physically beautiful and perfectly developed and there were far, far fewer of us, leaving plenty of room for nature and all her glorious splendor.

...and people are working on it. Take this article, for example:

Human Brained Monkeys: Working Out the Bugs
http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C10117% ... %2C00.html
Carlhole
 

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 07:17:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ritics argue that if these fetuses are allowed to develop into self-aware subjects, science will be thrown into an ethical nightmare.


Kind of off topic, but monkeys are self-aware. The can look into mirrors and understand they are staring at themselves, and they have their own creative thoughts.

The fact that they are already experimented on in such manners is in itself an ethical nightmare.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron