Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

plasma, and other large tvs - SUVs of electronics?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

plasma, and other large tvs - SUVs of electronics?

Unread postby Tuike » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 11:53:31

Quote from po.com news.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]As TVs grow, so do electric bills

Not long ago, Andrew Fanara was shopping with his wife for a new big-screen television. Everything was going fine, until the sales clerk discovered Mr. Fanara was an energy watchdog for the federal government. Pulling Fanara aside, the clerk confessed: His own new 61-inch TV gulped electricity the way a big SUV guzzles gasoline.

"The month after he got it, he got a call from his landlord, who noticed a big jump in the utility bill," recalls Fanara, team leader of the Energy Star program at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). "It was the kid's big-screen television."


Do you feel that buying a 61" plasma television would be same as buying an SUV right now? At least I feel that way now that I read the news. Energy prices are surely going up.
User avatar
Tuike
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon 10 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland

Unread postby Ayoob » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 12:05:24

Ask me anything about having a 21" monitor and a five-speaker sound system on my computer.
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby 0mar » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 13:00:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'A')sk me anything about having a 21" monitor and a five-speaker sound system on my computer.


Does it kick ass when you are watching Hawaiian Butt Nurses 7?
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Re: plasma, and other large tvs - SUVs of electronics?

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 13:02:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tuike', 'Q')uote from po.com news.

-Do you feel that buying a 61" plasma television would be same as buying an SUV right now? At least I feel that way now that I read the news. Energy prices are surely going up.


My initial, un-researched answer would be that electronics equipment require nowhere near as much energy as an automobile. If everyone gave up their SUV for a new plasma, we’d be a lot better off.
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Re: plasma, and other large tvs - SUVs of electronics?

Unread postby Tuike » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 13:21:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', 'M')y initial, un-researched answer would be that electronics equipment require nowhere near as much energy as an automobile. If everyone gave up their SUV for a new plasma, we’d be a lot better off.

Alright, but don't you think constructing a large tv consumes a lot of energy and other resources?
User avatar
Tuike
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon 10 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland

Unread postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 13:28:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'A')sk me anything about having a 21" monitor and a five-speaker sound system on my computer.


Does it kick ass when you are watching Hawaiian Butt Nurses 7?


You betcha

Gives a whole new meaning to RumpShaker
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby NeoPeasant » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 14:48:47

I just sent in the mortgage check with an additional $2000 principal reduction payment while we are still watching the old 13" tv-vcr combo with the broken rewind. The $2000 would have bought a kick-ass flat screen, but I am more concerned about facing a postpeak depression with a debt free home.

If my notebook computer had a video input we could just attach it to our old vcr and and use the vcr tuner to make a TV.
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby jato » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 14:57:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')oes it kick ass when you are watching Hawaiian Butt Nurses 7?


I don't know! I am too busy watching Mad Max Road Warrior and Red Dawn!

Image

Image
jato
 
Top

Unread postby PhilBiker » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 15:23:41

I've been a home theater enthusiast for many years, since long before learning about peak oil.

The new Plasma sets gobble electricity like there's no tomorrow and generate lots of heat. I wouldn't buy one. The LCDs are pretty efficient.

But not all big screens do. Sme of the projection sets are not much worse than a few bright light bulbs. Projectors often don't take any more juice than a desktop computer.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 15:43:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'I')'ve been a home theater enthusiast for many years, since long before learning about peak oil.

The new Plasma sets gobble electricity like there's no tomorrow and generate lots of heat. I wouldn't buy one. The LCDs are pretty efficient.

But not all big screens do. Sme of the projection sets are not much worse than a few bright light bulbs. Projectors often don't take any more juice than a desktop computer.


I love my Sanyo Z3 projector!
102" display, vibrant colors, pretty good blacks and only a couple K to buy it!
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country
Top

Unread postby PhilBiker » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 16:22:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') love my Sanyo Z3 projector!
102" display, vibrant colors, pretty good blacks and only a couple K to buy it!
What's the power cosumption? My Infocus X1 has very low power consumption and long bulb life for a projector. The low power consumption was a major factor when I bought it. Really! :) EDIT: I looked it up on google and the Z3 is about 200W just like the X1. Variable of course depending on other factors.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

The more nonrenewable energy consumed, the worse off we are

Unread postby mohomesteading » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 18:24:45

The more nonrenewable energy we consume in our daily lives, the worse off we are. But even if we stayed with what we already have, our offspring will still add to the power consumption just using the same powered objects we are.

In March 2006 our rural electric cooperative will be raising electric rates about 4%. That isn't too much, but if you go from your regular old electronics and start adding newer, hungrier items, well, then you will have a problem.

I figure that the situation is like the following. I have what I have right now and I well enjoy its use while it functions. If it quits working and I have to have it, I will find the most effecient replacement I can. If it is just a luxury, then I will learn to do without it. For those things that I can do manually, I will learn to do them as such.

In the end though it matters little what people choose to use inside and outside their homes. Once the price for energy goes up, it goes up. People will either cut back on consumption, maintain existing consumption or will choose to increase consumption and the prices be damned. Yes, that is pretty apparent, but I can't say what people will do as a whole because I see so much variability in thought processes that I know some in each group.

Those that wish to consume more and more each day are the ones I won't help out if they get in a bind. They can fend for themselves when times get tough.
User avatar
mohomesteading
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The more nonrenewable energy consumed, the worse off we

Unread postby PhilBiker » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 20:43:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mohomesteading', 'I') figure that the situation is like the following. I have what I have right now and I well enjoy its use while it functions. If it quits working and I have to have it, I will find the most effecient replacement I can. If it is just a luxury, then I will learn to do without it. For those things that I can do manually, I will learn to do them as such.
The key in that paragraph is how you define "luxury". I've been a movie fan for a long time, and when my old RPTV died, I replaced it with the least expensive most energy efficient model I could find. The new projector uses a fraction of the electricity of the old one and cost a fraction of the price, and used a fraction of the embedded energy to manufacture, but I still enjoy the occasional movie or sporting event. How much of your old life are you willing to just give up?

I think with that I'll go watch the game.....
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby 0mar » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 23:21:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob_Reloaded', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'A')sk me anything about having a 21" monitor and a five-speaker sound system on my computer.


Does it kick ass when you are watching Hawaiian Butt Nurses 7?


You betcha

Gives a whole new meaning to RumpShaker



hotttttt
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

Unread postby Sparaxis » Fri 17 Jun 2005, 23:30:29

I love journalistic license: Andrew Fanara doesn't even have a wife.

Anyway, at the current state of development, it makes much more sense to buy a big-screen LCD than plasma if you are concerned about energy consumption. LCD rear projection TVs aren't as thin as the true flat panel, but more affordable than the flat-panel ones now (and still much thinner than CRTs). Mine is Energy Star-rated and tested at 0.75 W in standby mode (off). But as the article noted, that's not where the energy is used--it's mostly in active mode.

Week after next, as the article noted, we are having a meeting, first to discuss how to reign in TV active mode energy consumption, followed by a day to look at how to reduce set-top-box consumption (those are real hogs..even off, they consume 20W of power.) Typically, this means that by end of 2006, we'll likely have a specification in place for TVs and STBs that will finally give consumers a choice between the hogs and the efficient models.

I think the interesting point in the article is that we've found that a big TV, combined with an set-top box (and perhaps second or third ones in other rooms), combined with a DVD player, combined with a receiver and stereo system, can now add up to consume more electricity than your refrigerator (and US refrigerators are now the most stringently efficient in the world).

The problem is, none of these boxes talk to each other. The DVD player doesn't know if the TV is on--the TV doesn't know if the stereo is on, etc.--and a lack of a communication protocol among these devices makes it difficult for manufacturers to build in mechanisms to power down the box when ithe box its connected to is not in use. A "smart power strip" (commercially available now) is one option--plug all your stuff into this, and it can sense the on/off state of each box, and shut other boxes down accordingly. Only the set-top box presents a problem, since it has to be in some power mode all the time since the decryption codes are sent over long periods of time to prevent hacking, and they, unfortunately, are the biggest offenders in energy waste. It wouldn't cost much to design one that could stay on in low power mode, but given the fact that the design specs are from the cable companies, and the boxes are built by manufacturers like Motorola, and consumers can't buy them directly, it's difficult to provide motivation to spend the money to design it lower. So we hope an Energy Star spec will provide that motivation.
User avatar
Sparaxis
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: California

Unread postby hoplite » Sat 18 Jun 2005, 01:49:53

you'd be surprised how much power your wasting with electronics- wall warts (xformers) for example are very wasteful if left plugged in 24/7 (like most people do). Some cable tv set top boxes consume 45 watts when their OFF!
User avatar
hoplite
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri 22 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby PhilBiker » Sat 18 Jun 2005, 09:37:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he problem is, none of these boxes talk to each other. The DVD player doesn't know if the TV is on--the TV doesn't know if the stereo is on, etc.--and a lack of a communication protocol among these devices makes it difficult for manufacturers to build in mechanisms to power down the box when ithe box its connected to is not in use. A "smart power strip" (commercially available now) is one option--plug all your stuff into this, and it can sense the on/off state of each box, and shut other boxes down accordingly. Only the set-top box presents a problem, since it has to be in some power mode all the time since the decryption codes are sent over long periods of time to prevent hacking, and they, unfortunately, are the biggest offenders in energy waste. It wouldn't cost much to design one that could stay on in low power mode, but given the fact that the design specs are from the cable companies, and the boxes are built by manufacturers like Motorola, and consumers can't buy them directly, it's difficult to provide motivation to spend the money to design it lower. So we hope an Energy Star spec will provide that motivation.
Phatom loads are a problem. In my modest HT system (which used to be not so modest, but has been scaled back a great deal) I use a switched outlet so that when the receiver is off, everything else has no power. When I turn on the receiver everything else gets power. Saves a lot of phantom load.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:57:44

i think you're going a bit overboard with all this. i know people should really think about energy a lot more but electronics devices are not the problem - its our reliance on individual cars that is the main problem.

having said that, i do tend to buy energy efficient things now, when before i never even thought about it. our tv is a 28" widescreen standard tv by jvc - it doesnt use a huge amount of power and i never leave it on standby. the biggest energy guzzler we have is our tumble dryer which - when you turn it on - sends our spinny electricity meter racing round incredibly fast
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby agni » Sat 18 Jun 2005, 14:59:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'i') think you're going a bit overboard with all this. i know people should really think about energy a lot more but electronics devices are not the problem - its our reliance on individual cars that is the main problem.

having said that, i do tend to buy energy efficient things now, when before i never even thought about it. our tv is a 28" widescreen standard tv by jvc - it doesnt use a huge amount of power and i never leave it on standby. the biggest energy guzzler we have is our tumble dryer which - when you turn it on - sends our spinny electricity meter racing round incredibly fast


Dryers are huge energy pigs. I fully expect more people returning to sundrying their clothes as gas and electricity rates increase. I always put my clothes through a high speed spin dryer before putting them through the dryer. Cuts down on drying times by about half.

-A
User avatar
agni
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby cube » Sat 18 Jun 2005, 15:38:44

hang drying your clothes seems a bit extreme....although I hear they do that in Japan b/c of the phenomenaly high energy costs....and Japan is known as a wealthy country. :wink:

I'm guessing air conditioning would be the biggest energy hog in terms of electricity use. I know I'm not the only person here who had a father that would sneak down at night when everyone was alseep on a hot summer night to turn off the air conditioning hoping nobody would notice. :-D
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron