Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

More Freeways. They just don't get it.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

More Freeways. They just don't get it.

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 09 May 2005, 17:10:01

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article ... 0000000001

One would think that after hearing about Peak Oil, and knowing about Peak Oil that our nations leaders could come up with a better transportation plan than this rediculous waste of tax money. 284 to 400 billion dollars is to be spent over the next 5 years on highway construction using deficit funding (of course) to pay for it.

Doesn't the Senate realize road traffic will be decreasing in the coming years as a result of post-peak oil depletion? I wonder sometimes if they do indeed know what's coming and are engaged in a final spending frenzy. It simply doesn't make any sense to waste around 1/3 trillion dollars repairing an obsolete transportation infrastructure.

A more sensible first-step approach for the USA would be to increase the fuel tax at the pump incrementally until it is no longer economically possible to operate low mileage personal vehicles as Europe has successfully done. With the money that could be saved by stopping the senseless and wasteful Iraq war and initiating financial disincentives to personal vehicle use we could divert increasingly scarce resources into supporting mass transportation which will be required in the coming post-cheap-oil era.

But will the Senate do what is sensible?

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby BiGG » Mon 09 May 2005, 18:04:36

Deficit spending? So I suppose the loan on your home and cars and ever other loan you and your family had is/was deficit spending also, no?

In case you haven’t noticed, this country has always been borrowing money just like you do and today’s world finds US no where near historic highs with borrowed money against the GDP and, that’s right, we right at time top of the food chain when comparing ourselves against anybody on the planet. Not bad for a small country likes ours! That scary sounding “deficit funding” put US there!

As far as maintaining our roads, WHAT AGAIN? Did you miss the part where we kinda need those roads for the world we live in today? You do know that everything you buy at you local stores was trucked in using those highways? You do know we have a gigantic economy going on right now that does not need to crash and maintaining our roads is a part of that, think here will ya?

It’s not like we don’t have plenty of oil remaining and alternatives in process as we speak. If you wanna ride a bus, call Greyhound but don’t mind the rest of US who enjoy our cars and plan on continuing to drive them now & in the future.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut will the Senate do what is sensible?


Humm, we are at the top-of-the-food-chain and that ain’t changing anytime soon so maybe its not the Senate lacking sense here, I think its more like you really have no idea regarding the ramifications what you are endorsing.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby arretium » Mon 09 May 2005, 18:09:22

Dang BiGG, if deficit spending isn't bad, then why not just eliminate taxes all together? Why bother with SS reform? Let's just borrow like crazy. Heck it doesn't matter right?

AND BTW - Don't you think I didn't notice how quickly you got to intermiediate crude...you post whore!
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Unread postby BiGG » Mon 09 May 2005, 18:22:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('arretium', 'D')ang BiGG, if deficit spending isn't bad, then why not just eliminate taxes all together? Why bother with SS reform? Let's just borrow like crazy. Heck it doesn't matter right?


Slow down a pinch, money doesn’t grow on trees, ya know!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ND BTW - Don't you think I didn't notice how quickly you got to intermiediate crude...you post whore!


I have 11.67 posts per day, you have 3.67 …. So does that make me four times the whore you are, or does that make you ¼ of the whore that I am? :lol:
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RonMN » Mon 09 May 2005, 19:45:13

All squabbeling aside...the government spending continues to look (to me) like a person who is about to file for bankruptcy...they go out & max out every credit card first!

I keep thinking that the gov't is going to borrow everthing they can & build infrastructure, homes, water-works, etc (as well as lining their own pockets) and then print up the money & pay it all off.

If the US dollar is going to collapse anyway...why not get what ya can, when ya can?
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby NeoPeasant » Mon 09 May 2005, 20:32:35

When hundreds of billions of dollars are on the line, you can be sure that graft and corruption and special interest lobby groups and corporate sponsored policy advocating "Think Tanks" are working furiously behind the scenes to make sure the freeways get built and the money changes hands. Whether the public actually wants or needs these roads is a matter of little importance.

Look at the bright side. Our bankrupt immobilized former country will have a glorious system of bicycle trails the likes of which the world has never seen.
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Free » Mon 09 May 2005, 20:36:25

Let's all start singing together: "Always look at the bright side of life, dada, dadadadaa, always look at the briiiight side of life....."

(sorry I couldn't resist, and all the latest developments are just too much for my nerves.)
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Mon 09 May 2005, 20:40:07

They are doing the same, here in Australia.

I am trying to get our State Govt to stop the nutty idea of ripping out our main railway into the centre of my local city...the railway is electrified, so it don't use too much oil (directly, anyway).

Instead, they wanna rip it out, sell the land to developers, who will build enormous Yuppie Apartments, (priced to match) while Us Stupid Travelling Public will have to make-do with BUSES.

Yup, diesel fuelled buses.

What's really gonna happen is the buses will go mostly empty, as people switch to cars, instead of having to trans-ship (as it were) from train to bus to complete the last 3 km of their journey.

So we'll be adding another 7,000 cars per DAY to the roads.

WOOOHOOO!

But, after all, the Oil companies aren't making enough money, now, are they (poor things)??
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Unread postby BiGG » Mon 09 May 2005, 20:55:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Free', 'L')et's all start singing together: "Always look at the bright side of life, dada, dadadadaa, always look at the briiiight side of life....."

(sorry I couldn't resist, and all the latest developments are just too much for my nerves.)


It’s much better then those who spend most of their time in the doomer camp, don’t ya think? You know …..….. toooooo many end up drinking the Kool-Aid
Last edited by BiGG on Mon 09 May 2005, 21:04:35, edited 1 time in total.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby BiGG » Mon 09 May 2005, 21:03:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', '
')
So we'll be adding another 7,000 cars per DAY to the roads.

WOOOHOOO!

But, after all, the Oil companies aren't making enough money, now, are they (poor things)??


Think of all your fellow Australians that will be growing biofuels and making money off those 7000 new cars plus all the current ones in a few years though when you don’t need antiquated oil anymore! Bonus for the local economy!
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Mon 09 May 2005, 21:18:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', 'T')hey are doing the same, here in Australia.

I am trying to get our State Govt to stop the nutty idea of ripping out our main railway into the centre of my local city...the railway is electrified, so it don't use too much oil (directly, anyway).

Instead, they wanna rip it out, sell the land to developers, who will build enormous Yuppie Apartments, (priced to match) while Us Stupid Travelling Public will have to make-do with BUSES.

Yup, diesel fuelled buses.

What's really gonna happen is the buses will go mostly empty, as people switch to cars, instead of having to trans-ship (as it were) from train to bus to complete the last 3 km of their journey.

So we'll be adding another 7,000 cars per DAY to the roads.

WOOOHOOO!

But, after all, the Oil companies aren't making enough money, now, are they (poor things)??


Like the US 1950s
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

I wouldn't sweat it.

Unread postby lee » Mon 09 May 2005, 21:41:11

I say, the more stupid stuff we do, the better.

BiGG:
Top of the food chain? Who? Japan? China?

The US is more vulnerable right now than it has ever been.
The deficits, the demographics, the wars, the decimated
manufacturing base, the massive oil dependence, the health
care crisis, the housing bubble... How
many snakes are their in the grass?

I imagine there are some people at the CIA who are
quietly very concerned, much like some of the NASA
engineers while waiting for the Columbia to return
to earth.
User avatar
lee
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri 10 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 09 May 2005, 23:18:42

Around here the interstate is in pretty rough shape. I've noticed some section that'll have you getting an alignment in no time! I regulary swerve during certain sections of my commute.

About government spending...At what point does the interest on the debt exceed money brought in?
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Unread postby nero » Tue 10 May 2005, 00:28:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bout government spending...At what point does the interest on the debt exceed money brought in?


In the US taxes are 31.4% of GDP and the interest payments are 2.0% of GDP. This is a moderate amount, the lenders may contine lending for some time yet, although if I was them I'd start making the loans repayable in euros not dollars.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Top

Unread postby seldom_seen » Tue 10 May 2005, 00:56:43

I think perpetual growth is not just an economic principal of our economy but a religion.

We must build new, bigger, better freeways with more lanes or we risk offending the sacred gods of perpetual growth. Without these offerings the gods will become angry and will punish us and stop providing the sacred ointment that fuels the machines.

The car is our temple and the mall is our chuch.

As oil becomes more scarce, we will become desperate to appease the gods by building greater monuments. Super mega malls, ocean sized parking lots and expansive bridges with many lanes. Only to cry out in shame "O ye vengeful gods why have thou forsaken me!"

Image
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ender » Tue 10 May 2005, 03:28:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', 'T')hey are doing the same, here in Australia.
I am trying to get our State Govt to stop the nutty idea of ripping out our main railway into the centre of my local city...the railway is electrified, so it don't use too much oil (directly, anyway).
Instead, they wanna rip it out, sell the land to developers, who will build enormous Yuppie Apartments, (priced to match) while Us Stupid Travelling Public will have to make-do with BUSES.


Yes, that proposal to close the rail line into Newcastle really is especially stupid. Even more stupid than the current tearing up of the second track to Bendigo ostensibly as part of a rail upgrade we're seeing in Victoria.

Best of luck in the campaign against it. In fact, if you need some help (probably limited to strategic advice), drop us a line at www.ptua.org.au
User avatar
Ender
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Top

Unread postby Omnitir » Tue 10 May 2005, 03:52:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', '
')I am trying to get our State Govt to stop the nutty idea of ripping out our main railway into the centre of my local city...the railway is electrified, so it don't use too much oil (directly, anyway).

Instead, they wanna rip it out, sell the land to developers, who will build enormous Yuppie Apartments, (priced to match) while Us Stupid Travelling Public will have to make-do with BUSES.

Yup, diesel fuelled buses.



It’s a similar thing here in Brisbane. Instead of focusing needed financial attention on Queensland rail, they are putting more into main roads. Sure it’s great having a large bus network, but wouldn’t a larger rail system make more sense? Maybe they are hoping to have a giant fleet of busses transporting people post PO? The busses here all run on natural gas (so they are at least clean burning), but I still prefer the electric trains to busses.

I don’t understand why governments the world over, are making long-term plans for transport infrastructure based on increased car ownership. For example, we have plans to build another massive bridge over Brisbane river which is planned to be completed sometime around 2013 I believe, and likewise plans for a massive tunnel system under the city. Why is the government planning these long-term expensive projects with PO on the horizon? Do they really need to plan for increasing traffic a decade from now? Or are they somehow unaware of PO? It just makes no sense.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Tue 10 May 2005, 06:07:42

they are obviously planning all these things because they dont believe peak oil, or they do believe it but that another fuel will take the place of oil. governments are advised by free market economists - does that answer your question?

politicians dont make any decisions. they are presented with a couple of options by civil servants (who are usually trained economists etc) and they chose the least expensive/offensive/controversial one usually.
they are therefore just a sort of rubber stamp.

anyway, ive said it before - what do you expect politicians to do? announce on tv that 'the end is nigh' and that they were starting projects to shut down the economy, rip up all the roads, kill of all the old folk?
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby Omnitir » Wed 11 May 2005, 22:54:55

I don’t expect politicians to do anything about PO until the public demand it. But what would make sense if for politicians to work towards public awareness of PO so that they can start conservation programs. Simply starting some awareness campaigns towards the coming energy crisis would make a big difference to public opinion.

Think about this: if everyone was even half as aware and concerned about PO as most of the members of these boards are, would governments still be trying to sell long-term expensive civil engineering expansion projects, or conservation programs?

I think the only reason governments are in “business as usual” mode is that the majority of the public don’t see any problems. People need a proverbial slap in the face and awoken to PO.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under

Unread postby merecat » Wed 11 May 2005, 23:20:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'P')eople need a proverbial slap in the face and awoken to PO.


Yes, i couldnt agree more, its about time we had $100/barrel oil, even then it'd be a bargain. Its the best way to make someone take notice, hit 'em in the wallet.
User avatar
merecat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri 22 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron