by MonteQuest » Sat 05 Mar 2005, 12:02:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he largest uranium mines are in the United States, Canada, France, Australia, South Africa and Russia. Many of the mining areas are on land occupied by indigenous people, for example the Aborigines of Australia.
According to Aboriginal mythology, the Rainbow Serpent, asleep in the earth, guards over those elemental powers which lie outside of humankind’s control. Any attempt to seize these underworld elements will disturb the sleep of the serpent, provoking its vengeance: a terrible deluge of destruction and death.
‘The Rainbow Serpent has been wakened. Men turned into shadows, cancer, women giving birth to jellyfish babies, leukaemia - since the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, since the Bravo test in the Bikini Islands, and since the Chernobyl catastrophe in April of 1986, we know that the Rainbow Serpent doesn’t differentiate between uranium’s military and peaceful uses. Death everywhere it touches. But what we perhaps don’t realise is that the destructive properties of uranium are unleashed the moment it’s mined from the ground’. Extracted from the World Uranium Hearing.
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/no. ... fabmi.htmlIt's interesting that Greenpeace considers tribal religious beliefs to be relevant to sober discussion of the pros and cons of nuclear energy. I don't want my congressman saying: "Yah, I'd vote for nuclear energy if I wasn't so damn scared of that Aborigine snake thing."

At The World Uranium Hearing held in Salzburg, Austria in September 1992, witnesses from all continents including indigenous speakers and scientists testified to the falsity of the terminology used and sanctioned by industry and governments world-wide. Fifty years of military and civilian use of nuclear power meant war for those whose homelands have been used for mining and processing of uranium and chosen for atomic weapons testing, atomic energy production and atomic waste disposal. Every day human life and the natural world are sacrificed along the radioactive trail of our nuclear way.
The stories told by the indigenous delegates constituted an appalling indictment of nuclear colonialism. For it is their homelands, their bodies, and their ancient cultures that are most immediately victimized by nuclear power and nuclear weapons. On their lands, which they hold sacred, 70% of the world's uranium is mined, most of the testing takes place, and radioactive waste is dumped. These crimes are compounded, in virtually every case, by secrecy and deception and intimidation on the part of industry and government.
So, I would say that the views of these indigenous people are quite relevant to the pros and cons of nuclear power. Like
organization for change, Green Peace has it's radicals, but it's goals are for the betterment of the planet. We can't always agree with the means to an end. Some of their members feel radical methods are now necessary, and a strong case can be made to support their position.