by Fiddlerdave » Mon 03 Jan 2011, 04:31:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'M')ugabe's big mistake was his land reform system giving farms to veterans who knew nothing about farming. Chavez could easily paralell Mugabe simply by messing up a few major oil contracts; which could happen much quicker than the deacade it took to destroy Zimbabwe.
People who have been thrown off land and dispossessed for some time will indeed have some learning to do, and need time to accumulate capital.
However, as we saw in South Africa, the privileged few who had taken large estates under aristocratic corrupt regimes were loath to share in the wealth by giving reasonable working conditions or wages to anyone else. This, splitting up the huge holdings, much of which was idle ground, with the accompanying temporary disruption is the alternative.
Unlike the USA, the Venezuelan "middle class" was not a large segment of society. Much of the Venezuelan populace remained in abject poverty under previous rulers, a fact the anti-Chavez factions never seem very concerned about. Chavez's introduction of food support, health care, and education for a wide swath of the poor Venezuelan population is ambitious and expensive.