by TWilliam » Sun 14 Feb 2010, 23:28:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'O')n a related note, why couldn't at least one follower of this movement be physically attractive? It could do wonders for their cause (which seems to be acquiring notoriety and $$$) if the result were 18 little Brads and Angelinas running around. Instead, the Earth gets an overabundance of very bland breeding stock.

That's because the anorexic waif that is considered to be today's feminine ideal makes for poor breeding stock. Women with (relatively) narrow hips, low bone mass and chronically underweight bodies generally don't carry or birth children well. Trying to have a large family would very likely kill them, or at least drastically reduce the span of their reproductive years...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "