Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

One more step toward global governance

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 09 Nov 2008, 22:12:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ONDON (Reuters) - The international financial crisis has given world leaders a unique opportunity to create a truly global society, Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown will say in a keynote foreign policy speech on Monday.
In his annual speech at the Lord Mayor's Banquet, Brown -- who has spearheaded calls for the reform of international financial institutions -- will say Britain, the United States and Europe are key to forging a new world order.
link
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby idiom » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 00:15:37

Well at least the next epic crash will be perfectly co-ordinated.
The world ends without a tragedy,Time is melting into history
The sky is falling, Voices crying out in desperation
Hear them calling, Everybody, save yourself
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 00:26:44

If government is good, more government is better.

Believers should get to work making this happen ASAP.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby POAlex » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 00:28:33

Last edited by POAlex on Mon 10 Nov 2008, 00:40:11, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
POAlex
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 00:38:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'I')f government is good, more government is better.

Believers should get to work making this happen ASAP.


That's pretty much the only entity hiring right now.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby seldom_seen » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 01:40:27

There's people over on the Ron Paul thread who think he's a complete loon who's gone off the conspiracy theory deep end...and here's the Prime Minister of the U.K. saying the same thing.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 01:55:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'T')here's people over on the Ron Paul thread who think he's a complete loon who's gone off the conspiracy theory deep end...and here's the Prime Minister of the U.K. saying the same thing.

Yep, and the PM of the UK is not the only leader of a country calling for it. It is coming and fast. Obama is a major NWO guy.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby lowem » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 01:58:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'T')hat's pretty much the only entity hiring right now.

So if government or gov-related organizations are slowing down or having a hiring freeze, I'd suppose you know what that says about the rest of the economy.
It's an employer's market - that is, if there is anyone employing.
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Zardoz » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 05:24:56

Just curious, but who will do the "global governing"? Who, specifically, will be in charge? Who will the heads of state of the existing sovereign nations report to? Hank Paulsen? David Rockefeller? Jacob Rothschild?

Or will there be heads of state? Will they be called "managers" or "governors" rather than "presidents" or "prime ministers"?

What will The Big Boss do about recalcitrant nations that don't take a knee all that willingly? Who will be his enforcer? Will we have to shoulder the burden? Where will we get the force necessary to subdue the entire world? We're essentially tapped out now trying to get some ragtag insurgents under control in a couple of small little countries. What will we do if India declines the invitation to surrender its sovereignty to some jive-ass banker? Any suggestions on how you get 1,200,000,000 people to do something they don't want to do? Threaten them with nukes?

(That might not be such a good idea, considering how many nuclear warheads there are floating around out there. Once they started going off, whoever is running the show would be vulnerable to getting nuked themselves. Do you think they'd calculate the risk of that to be justifiable, all for the sake of adding a zero or two to the number on the bottom line of their financial statement?)

Oh, and how about those billion or so Muslims out there? They've been known to be a bit cranky about taking orders from Jews. Exactly how will Jake Rothschild get them to play ball? Maybe he'll threaten to raise interest rates on them or something.

Please explain all of the above. Please detail the nuts and bolts of this global takeover by some guys who sit at computers and make virtual money. I'm really puzzled. Chairman Mao said that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. History has proved him correct.

How much firepower can David Rockefeller bring to bear?
Last edited by Zardoz on Mon 10 Nov 2008, 10:19:00, edited 1 time in total.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Bas » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 05:32:27

you guys are overreacting. When they're talking about global governance they're talking about treaties to regulate the financial industry, nothing more, nothing less.
Bas
 

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Narz » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 05:40:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou guys are overreacting. When they're talking about global governance they're talking about treaties to regulate the financial industry, nothing more, nothing less.

Nu-uh, when someone in government says "new world order" or anything that sounds similar it means everything Alex Jones has ever said is true. Haven't you taken Logic 101? :roll:
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Bas » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 06:07:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '
')Nu-uh, when someone in government says "new world order" or anything that sounds similar it means everything Alex Jones has ever said is true. Haven't you taken Logic 101? :roll:


Well, taking the experience from Europe I'd say it won't happen so fast and will mostly entail economic cooperation and maybe environmental issues. It will happen only very gradually as well. NWO and global society are just big words that are really quite meaningless. And I for one think it would be good if there was an international treaty regulating the financial industry, but reaching such a deal is much more easily said than done, let alone a "NWO". These processes are usually painfully slow, just look at how difficult it is to reach a new trade deal in the WTO, takes years and years and then they still don't have a result to show for.
Bas
 
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Zardoz » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 10:17:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou guys are overreacting.

That's what conspiracy theorists do best.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 10:49:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou guys are overreacting. When they're talking about global governance they're talking about treaties to regulate the financial industry, nothing more, nothing less.

Nu-uh, when someone in government says "new world order" or anything that sounds similar it means everything Alex Jones has ever said is true. Haven't you taken Logic 101? :roll:


Actually, wasn't it George H W Bush who coined the phrase New World Order and the loonies just coopted it for their own purposes. It's not exactly a new phrase nor has it ever directly meant what the tinfoilers now say it means.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby mattduke » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 11:01:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou guys are overreacting. When they're talking about global governance they're talking about treaties to regulate the financial industry, nothing more, nothing less.

Nu-uh, when someone in government says "new world order" or anything that sounds similar it means everything Alex Jones has ever said is true. Haven't you taken Logic 101? :roll:


Actually, wasn't it George H W Bush who coined the phrase New World Order and the loonies just coopted it for their own purposes. It's not exactly a new phrase nor has it ever directly meant what the tinfoilers now say it means.

Cecil Rhodes
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Eli » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 12:38:38

It is not a conspiracy to say that the those in power have a desire to see a one world economic body formed. The CFR and other organizations have been openly calling for a one world currency for a very long time.

And it is interesting to note that both Obama and GWB are interested in seeing the NWO come to fruition. We will see a one world currency before this is over and the rise of Global Bank that controls the money creation of the planet. The laws of individual nations will be meaningless before a global body with this much power.


And as we have seen the during the current crisis that the banks and the powerful elite have changed and ignored the law to their advantage. They have gotten their bail out and will leave nothing left for the common citizen. The only hope the citizens currently is a false hope in Obama, but he has been bought and paid for by the very people that are currently crushing the common man.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Twilight » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:50:50

The phrase "new world order" is a fickle part the linguistic commons. It has no specific identity that has been true at every time. It has been attached to numerous agendas in different times and has now been bastardised by popular culture such that today it has all the intrinsic meaning of a mirror. Its usage has varied and will continue to vary. The meaning you attach to it and the meaning someone else attaches to it will not necessarily be the same. Its appearance in mainstream political speech signifies nothing more than a grandiose flourish that would be considered poor style even from a high school debating team.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby highlander » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:56:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', ' ') We will see a one world currency before this is over and the rise of Global Bank that controls the money creation of the planet. The laws of individual nations will be meaningless before a global body with this much power.


It looks to be starting Nov 15th in DC with a meeting of the G20. The US will no longer be appointing the head of the world bank. The dollar may not be the currency of choice for oil sales. Watch these meetings closely.
This is where everybody puts profound words written by another...or not so profound words written by themselves
Highlander 2007
User avatar
highlander
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby Zardoz » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 16:33:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('highlander', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', ' ') We will see a one world currency before this is over and the rise of Global Bank that controls the money creation of the planet. The laws of individual nations will be meaningless before a global body with this much power.

It looks to be starting Nov 15th in DC with a meeting of the G20.

Duly noted. We'll get back to you after the meeting.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: One more step toward global governance

Unread postby erb » Mon 10 Nov 2008, 17:10:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou guys are overreacting. When they're talking about global governance they're talking about treaties to regulate the financial industry, nothing more, nothing less.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', 'J')ust curious, but who will do the "global governing"? Who, specifically, will be in charge? Who will the heads of state of the existing sovereign nations report to? Hank Paulsen? David Rockefeller? Jacob Rothschild?

Or will there be heads of state? Will they be called "managers" or "governors" rather than "presidents" or "prime ministers"?

What will The Big Boss do about recalcitrant nations that don't take a knee all that willingly? Who will be his enforcer? Will we have to shoulder the burden? Where will we get the force necessary to subdue the entire world? We're essentially tapped out now trying to get some ragtag insurgents under control in a couple of small little countries. What will we do if India declines the invitation to surrender its sovereignty to some jive-ass banker? Any suggestions on how you get 1,200,000,000 people to do something they don't want to do? Threaten them with nukes?

(That might not be such a good idea, considering how many nuclear warheads there are floating around out there. Once they started going off, whoever is running the show would be vulnerable to getting nuked themselves. Do you think they'd calculate the risk of that to be justifiable, all for the sake of adding a zero or two to the number on the bottom line of their financial statement?)

Oh, and how about those billion or so Muslims out there? They've been known to be a bit cranky about taking orders from Jews. Exactly how will Jake Rothschild get them to play ball? Maybe he'll threaten to raise interest rates on them or something.

Please explain all of the above. Please detail the nuts and bolts of this global takeover by some guys who sit at computers and make virtual money. I'm really puzzled. Chairman Mao said that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. History has proved him correct.

How much firepower can David Rockefeller bring to bear?


sounds like some bagdhad bob stuff "there are no troops here"

personaly i think its much to important to take a chance that it might be a bit of an over reaction, and its not about adding a zero to the bottom line, money means nothing to those who have more than average people can imagine.

but... dont worry it will all be ok, go back to sleep, bad dreams are just dreams
LOOKING FOR -a view of the enditems-
User avatar
erb
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Location: toronto, not anymore
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron