by thuja » Wed 08 Oct 2008, 20:40:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')ut aren't they two sides to the same coin?
For years now you and I have been debating (I'm paraphrasing so don't get excited)
earn more vs need less
PO IS economic Armageddon to which little or even big blips on someone's or even everyone's financial radar can't hold a candle.
The thing to worry about in my worthless opinion (which I'm told recently will get you killed) is how long is one willing to bet they can earn enough to keep up the charade and at the same time prepare to need less.
Sounds strange reading it back to myself but I can't figure how to make it more clear
funny I thought we were arguing about urban vs. rural for a while...but yes that includes having a job versus not having a job.
In my opinion, things have been way too far skewed towards "needing less" on this and other forums, and not enough interested in the fundamentals of survival...namely...having a job.
You ask folks from the Great Depression if they were working on simplifying their lives. They'd say huh? they were working on getting and keeping a job...any job.
I know it sounds mundane and unimportant...but the age of wage slavery has not gone away...in fact it will become even more important in years to come. The world will be divided between those who can hold onto a job...and those who can't.
(O' course there are a few who have enough secured savings to not need a job- but man that's a small ammount.)