by killJOY » Sun 24 Aug 2008, 10:30:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')he party line at the store I work at is that "a guy who said he was giving it to his pigs was selling it and someone got sick and sued us..."
Very interesting. (The idea of feeding corn husks to people is hilarious.) Is this an urban legend?
In any case, the moral of this story is: CAPITALISTS NEVER GIVE AWAY ANYTHING FREE. NOT EVEN GARBAGE.
P.S. I'm reminded of my (insane) teenage days, when I worked at a McDonald's "restaurant." One time, some "bums" came to the back door to ask if we had any "waste" they could have. The manager lied and said no, though we had a full waste bucket full of "expired" burgers.
After they left, the MGR made some contemptuous remark and then instructed me to step on the burgers in the bucket and throw them into the dumpster.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
-

killJOY
- Intermediate Crude

-
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
- Location: ^NNE^
-
by Ferretlover » Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:40:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'R')ecently at the supermarket, I inquired about a barrel full of corn husks and other vegetable refuse that the store was going to throw out. I could feed them to the pigs and cows. -snip- He came back with the following missive from his "superiors": "We can't give that stuff away, because if your animals choke to death we could be sued."
HHmm.. Maybe next time, tell them you want the waste for your compost pile?
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
-
Ferretlover
- Elite

-
- Posts: 5852
- Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
- Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
-
by Heineken » Sun 24 Aug 2008, 21:41:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'N')ot wasting food will not solve the problem of undernourished and starving people. Instead, it will actually increase their numbers.
There's no point in increasing the food supply if this only leads to more people and thus more demand for food and everything else and thus more damage to the underlying natural systems.
When, oh when, will we get a clue? The unifying issue is the vast and still-expanding size of the human population and its bottomless demands.
A basic rule in the history of demography and economics:
The societies who have made the transition to low fertility rates now have enough wealth to become more rational, post-capitalist, efficient consumers.
Japan and Europe are there.
Nonsense, Lorenzo. Japan and most European countries are major Earth rapists. They are net importers of food. Japan is destroying the world's oceans in its ceaseless quest for seafood at any cost.
And the countries with the smallest environmental footprints are the starving impoverished ones.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
by lorenzo » Mon 25 Aug 2008, 09:05:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', ' ') Remember: more food = less people.
are you sure that it's
just food, or is it more like wealth in general?
Sure, it's wealth in general, but it starts with a transition from agriculture-dominated societies to industry-dominated societies.
As a rule of thumb, this transition leads to mass migrations of rural populations to cities, and to an increasing agricultural productivity. In short, fewer people grow more food.
This brings with it a demographic transition towards lower fertility rates. And once the industrial sector begins to grow, the groundwork is there for a middle class to emerge.
This is a critical stage, as it is in this phase that crude, wasteful consumption of food and consumer products can be observed. People make fewer babies, but the babies eat much more, so to speak. This is the situation that can be found in countries like China, Brazil, and even the U.S. - most developing or moderately developed countries.
Finally, in a third and fourth stage, - the transition to a highly advanced, wealthy service and post-industrial economy - brings with it a new demographic transition towards population declines. Fewer people share much more wealth. This situation allows these wealthy societies to transition towards more environmentally friendly production processes. This is what is happening in the EU and Japan.
In short, it all starts with a transition from agrarian to industrial societies. And most of the poorest countries on the planet are still very much agrarian societies. They don't produce enough food, they have high fertility rates, and they don't have an industrial sector.
If they start to grow an industry, people will migrate to the cities, fewer farmers will be left, but they will become far more productive, and be capable to feed a smaller, but wealthier population.
In this historic sense, one can clearly say: more food = fewer people.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', 'w')hile it aggravates me that we're so wasteful, it's encouraging to know there's so much room for efficiency to make gains.
Exactly. The new economies that are trying to become more sustainable, will see the creation of wealth in waste-reduction sectors - in many fields, be it in industry, energy, food production or agriculture.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', 't')he one little thing that, however, gives me pause is, just how far can we realistically whittle away at that level of waste? is there any large scale society that has at any time brought their food use efficiency close to a hundred percent? you would think w/our modern advantages that we'd be able to do better, though.