by yesplease » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 19:43:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'S')eems pretty pointless to have so expensive a car only to save fuel. Its little more than a posh motorbike.
With fuel prices where they are in Europe, at ~10,000 miles per year it's ~$2,000 less per year to run compared to a motorbike at ~50mpg. Over the course of the vehicle's likely life that's a ~$60,000 difference in fuel costs. Unlike a motorbike it provides climate control, ABS, ESP, and huge safety advantages...$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')espite its small size and light weight, Volkswagen says the 1-Litre-Car is as safe as a GT sports car registered for racing. With the aid of computer crash simulations, the car was designed with built-in crash tubes, pressure sensors for airbag control, and front crumple zones. Its aluminium fuel tank is located in a protected area behind the passengers. As well, the 1-Litre-Car includes ABS and ESP (electronic stability program).
kind of protection. I suppose the question is do we want the car to crumple around us, or do we want to crumple w/ the car?