by wisconsin_cur » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:31:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('virgincrude', 'B')as, this is actually a far deeper subject than you'd think. Language IS culture for most people, and speaking any language as a non-native speaker is filled with the obstacles and pit falls inherent in the misunderstanding, ignorance or mis-use of that second (third or fourth) culture.
English, for example, is taken to be the most straightforward of tools for communication and explanation. It's a rather blunt instrument however, when it comes to matters of the heart or spirit where even German is believed by native speakers to be superior (German poets for example.) French is assumed (both by speakers and the Anglo community) to be 'the language of love', but what about the Dom Tom (Domain de Ultramere) french speakers, of African descent, whose culture can't be described as 'French'?
...
Speaking several languages from early childhood is not only good for general intelligence levels, it's good for emotional development, and general communication skills all round.
I'm of limited help. I can read two dead languages but can only speak my native english (I am fluent, however, in both the hillbilly dialect as well as the more proper "American English" you might hear on the 5pm news). but I find the above quote an example of the biases we are talking about. there is some great american poetry being written in English... even in hillbilly.
Is knowing several languages better for emotional and intellectual development or do the families who foster that learning start their children off with a love for education, good nutrition and with a lower percentage of household abuse (to address the issue of emotional adjustment) or just exhibit better coping mechanisms?
If I grew up knowing how to work on German diesel as well as GM gasoline cars, would I also get some benefit from learning multiple mechanical "languages"? Maybe. Would it show up on testing? probably not.
There probably are some differences in that the way we learn to think is influenced by the way we learn to structure sentences and paragraphs. Not that one is "smarter" than another but we would expect the different skills to come out. The same would be true within a language for that matter. Most of the engineers I know "think like engineers" a language given to analytics would produce more analytical thinkers. A poetic language may produce more poetic thinkers. etc...
Someone can still speak engineering in French or seduce a woman in English... they might just to have to work a little harder on the syntax, thats all.