by lper100km » Wed 15 Aug 2007, 13:32:31
EJ
In a cryptic way, I was simply observing that to do just about anything, even something considered to be useful, in today's society requires the use of oil. Hence the dilemma I referred to. It is unfortunately not an absurdity but it is an inescapable fact.
Your analogy, by the way, is not apt. Meetings are discretionary, eating is not.
There are other ways to conduct meetings through the use of technology. However, if social contact is considered to be a high priority, then you are going to leave much bigger carbon footprints behind.
For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.