by WatchfulEye » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 07:20:15
There have been many studies of echniacea, the vast majority, inconclusive or failing to demonstrate a beneficial effect.
What's interesting about this study is that, it has taken the results from 14 different studies and combined them, so that a more sophisticated analysis could be performed. This allows this study to detect an effect which may have been too small to detect in smaller studies. This is a technique called 'meta analysis'.
Of course, there are problems with meta analysis - they only included studies that had been published. Studies that fall flat on their face, because they find absolutely nothing of value may not get published. So meta analyses may be biased to finding a beneficial effect where one doesn't exist. It is also highly susceptible to the quality of the original studies - flaws in the original studies are easily propagated into the meta analysis.
Nevertheless, an interesting result, and one that should encourage further study. Echninacea is a reasonably safe remedy (about the same level of safety as conventional cold and 'flu remedies), so if it can actually shorten the duration of symptoms then surely it must be recommended.
My only concern is that, currently the sale of herbal remedies is not regulated to the extent that the sale of drugs are. There is no need for those selling them to know whether the remedy is appropriate, what its side effects are, and who shouldn't take it. I recently took a look at a number of echniacea preparations at some local health food stores, and asked some of the staff for advice - Not a single package, nor a single staff member, knew that echniacea should not be taken be people with asthma (because it can trigger or worsen attacks).