by Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 16:30:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'I')t just occurred to me, would widespread panic provide a benefit to anyone? Would it be a better alternative than some other outcome? Could it be purposefully initiated, so that it could be dealt with in a planned, managed way, instead of letting it happen randomly at some point in the future?
Sure. A frightened people is an easily controlled people. Get the masses quaking in their boots and they will plead for the very measures they would have cursed.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', '
')Or could the weatherman have been reading PO or TOD, and interjected that on his own? Does the guy still have a job? If he doesn't still have his job, it would be because they
didn't want to start a panic.
I suspect exactly this. He's been at the station many years, and is reasonably popular - however, he's getting older, so his days in TV may be numbered. He does still have a job - but this is just one, local station. I doubt many people made the connection between land area and die-off.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'Y')es, our helplessness is adorable, isn't it? The flipside of King Canute giving orders to the tides, is when we howl at the night in impotent defiance of its darkness. Yet when we attempt to defy our own darkness, it is in silence.