Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

We don't need animal products.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 09:43:29

EDIT:

PLEASE NOTE, DISCLAIMER:
THE FOLLOWING FROM THIS PARTICULAR POSTER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANIMAL WELFARE, ANIMAL RIGHTS, OR THE IDEA THAT ANY DIET IS IN ANY WAY MORALLY SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER. THEREFORE ANY REFERENCE TO THESE THINGS HAS BEEN MADE ON A STRICTLY OFF-TOPIC BASIS AND IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE OP. ANY FUTURE REFERENCE SHOULD NOW BE ADDRESSED TO POSTERS OTHER THAN THE OP, PREFERABLY THOSE WHO ACTUALLY BROUGHT THEM UP. UNFORTUNATELY ANY ON-TOPIC COMMENTS WILL ALSO HAVE TO BE MADE TO OTHER POSTERS IF A REPLY IS DESIRED. PRIVATE MESSAGES MAY GET A RESPONSE, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE OP. IT WAS SUPPOSED THAT THE LINK TO PEAK OIL WOULD BE OBVIOUS, AND THAT NOT MENTIONING MORALITY WOULD BE ENOUGH TO INDICATE THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO ARGUE ABOUT IT. CLEARLY THIS WAS AN INCORRECT ASSUMPTION. IN THE FUTURE, THE HUMAN BEHIND THIS POST SHALL NO LONGER ASSUME THAT NON-VEGANS ARE NOT COMPLETELY OBSESSED WITH THE MORAL ISSUES SURROUNDING ANIMAL FOODS, OR WILL NOT FEEL PERSONALLY THREATENED AND LOSE ALL ABILITY COMPREHEND TEXT WHEN CONFRONTED BY THE MERE CONCEPT OF NOT CONSUMING THEM FOR ANY REASON. LESSON LEARNED.


The 'we're designed to eat meat, so we need it' argument is flawed. This is partly cut and pasted from my post in another thread:

We're designed to be able to eat meat (and raw meat only - carcinogens in cooked meat may be partly responsible our species' and meat-eating Western society's cancer levels, hence vegetarians in the West get 3 times less cancer and live 7 years longer than their meat-eating neighbours), among many other things. Humans have the ability to obtain every one of our essential nutrients from non-animal sources, provided the soil we live off of contains the right mineral balance (e.g. enough cobalt to make vitamin B12), as it used to. Find me just one nutrient that humans can obtain only through eating animal products, and I will concede that we are designed to need meat. So far the desperate meat and dairy and recently, fish industries, despite their best efforts, have failed to validly do so, so I doubt anyone here can either.

It's like saying we're designed to need nuts. We can live with no deficiencies at all on a diet without that particular food group, even though we're designed to be able to safely get nutrients from them if we do include them.

I also find it funny that people who are appalled by the idea of GM crops eat farmed animals, as these were all genetically modified in a far more haphazard way than the DNA engineering carried out now. Modern 'cows' and 'pigs' that have had their wild instincts largely bred out of them by human selection, look much more different to their ancestors than GM carrots look to non-GM carrots. How can we know how different their nutritional content might be to that which our ancestors consumed, even if uncooked?

Here's one helpful example of the many webpages addressing important things for vegetarians and vegans to know.

http://www.fcs.uga.edu/pubs/current/FDNS-E-18.html

I recommend as much research about nutrition as possible, especially for people who aren't vegetarians now but think they're likely to be forced to be in the future. Personally, I'm going to apply for one of the few courses, commissioned by the National Health Service, that make possible registration with the Health Professions Council as as a qualified Dietician. It's six years of continuous study, so I shouldn't forget a word by the time the knowledge becomes vital.

Finally, relax. This article shows that it's possible for people outside of civilisation to live long, happy lives as vegans. Longer than the Western average, actually:

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/life/2005/01/07/stories/2005010700080200.htm

The few thousand Brok-pa Aryans have over 5,000 years lived in these hostile terrain at 15,000 ft altitude, subsisting on a vegan diet.

Music and dance are a way of life for them. Both men and women wear colourful costume, decorating their hair with flowers, and are full of joi de vivre. They live in harmony with nature, and are cheerful and stress-free despite living in small rock shelters. They trek long distances.

Almond, apricot and walnut form part of the diet along with endless cups of black tea fortified with barley flour.

The weather in September is pleasantly cold, though temperatures in January can plummet to -20 degrees Celsius. There are an unusually large number of Aryans above 70 years. Many are active even at 90.
Last edited by happycrop on Sat 05 May 2007, 17:25:36, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00:34

Try to take this pickled pig's foot from me. Come on, I dare you.

Maybe you'll peel it from my cold, dead hand.

Nothing wrong with "being" vegetarian. Many people make a considered decision for good economic, health reasons.

Then there's moralists like you, who are not satisfied "being" vegetarian: No, you have to be RIGHT.

You're like the bisexuals who aren't happy just being bisexuals: No, they have to create the myth of their own superiority over those other, limited people. "Why miss out on the other fifty percent of the population?"

You vegans see someone eating meat, and that's all you see: MEAT EATER.

You forget that many of us raise hundreds of our own vegetable crops a year.



Shove the Pig's Foot a Little Further Into the Fire.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 10:05:31

Um, did you actually read my post?

Sorry, but I don't have time to reply to comments that don't address the thread topic. I hope the majority of people who'll survive won't be so rude or time-wasting, or we don't stand a chance.
Last edited by happycrop on Sat 05 May 2007, 10:12:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 05 May 2007, 10:12:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')orry, but I don't have time to reply to comments that don't address the thread topic.


Except that you did.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 10:16:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')orry, but I don't have time to reply to comments that don't address the thread topic.


Except that you did.

Yes, I gave more of my time for you than you stole from me and other visitors to the thread, in the spirit of sacrifice we're going to need.

Now let's be nice or at least impersonal. That's my last word on the matter.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby TorrKing » Sat 05 May 2007, 10:36:04

Happycrap,

Then why do all vegans look pale and have grey hair then?

You are right about eating raw meats. Raw or semi cooked meat is much more healthy and richer in vitamins (including vitamin C) and minerals. Do not eat carnivores and omnivores raw though. And not rodents or horse either.
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 05 May 2007, 11:18:40

Title of forum:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')eak Oil

Description or "agenda": $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')"Exploring the Issue of Hydrocarbon Depletion"

Username: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')appycrop

Title of thread:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]We don't need animal products.

Statement on separate thread: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Check out the design of your teeth sometime.

Humans are OMNIVORES ... we are designed/evolved to eat vegetables ... and MEAT." WRONG. We're designed to be able to eat meat (and raw meat only - cooked meat is partly responsible our species' and meat-eating Western society's cancer levels, hence vegetarians in the West get 3 times less cancer and live 7 years longer than their meat-eating neighbours), among many other things. Humans have the ability to obtain every one of our essential nutrients from non-animal sources, provided the soil we live off of contains the right minerals, as it used to. Find me just one nutrient that humans can obtain only through eating animal products, and I will concede that we are designed to need meat. So far the desperate meat and dairy industries, despite their best efforts, have failed to validly do so, so I doubt anyone here can either.


Statement on this thread:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he 'we're designed to eat meat, so we need it' argument is flawed. This is partly cut and pasted from my post in another thread:
We're designed to be able to eat meat (and raw meat only - carcinogens in cooked meat may be partly responsible our species' and meat-eating Western society's cancer levels, hence vegetarians in the West get 3 times less cancer and live 7 years longer than their meat-eating neighbours), among many other things. Humans have the ability to obtain every one of our essential nutrients from non-animal sources, provided the soil we live off of contains the right mineral balance (e.g. enough cobalt to make vitamin B12), as it used to. Find me just one nutrient that humans can obtain only through eating animal products, and I will concede that we are designed to need meat. So far the desperate meat and dairy and recently, fish industries, despite their best efforts, have failed to validly do so, so I doubt anyone here can either.
Oh oh that smell. Can you smell that smell. Oh oh that smell. The smell that surrounds you. It's the reek of an agenda. Give it time. You've already told us eating cooked meat causes cancer. Soon you'll tell us about the "friend" of yours who's a surgeon who "regularly" removes "flukes" from meat-eaters' livers.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby eric_b » Sat 05 May 2007, 12:28:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Torjus', 'H')appycrap,

Then why do all vegans look pale and have grey hair then?

You are right about eating raw meats. Raw or semi cooked meat is much more healthy and richer in vitamins (including vitamin C) and minerals. Do not eat carnivores and omnivores raw though. And not rodents or horse either.


So what meat is safe to eat raw? Years ago a friend made me a 'cannibal' sandwhich which had raw raw beef + onions.. it was good but it rested in my stomach like a boat anchor.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby TorrKing » Sat 05 May 2007, 12:44:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Torjus', 'H')appycrap,

Then why do all vegans look pale and have grey hair then?

You are right about eating raw meats. Raw or semi cooked meat is much more healthy and richer in vitamins (including vitamin C) and minerals. Do not eat carnivores and omnivores raw though. And not rodents or horse either.


So what meat is safe to eat raw? Years ago a friend made me a 'cannibal' sandwhich which had raw raw beef + onions.. it was good but it rested in my stomach like a boat anchor.


It takes some time to get used to. Deers (moose, deer, caribou etc...) are safe to eat raw at least in the north. But according to what I've heard that isn't the case where there is no snow in winter. Don't know why that is or if it is true. I eat both raw and cooked moose. My preference is just a slight fry to it. Rare steak is essentially raw and is considered the steak with most flavour.

It is common belief that cooking meat makes it more digestible, but in reality the opposite is true. It is with vegetables this is an advantage, since it breaks down the starches to digestible sugars.
http://livingprimitively.com/

Need new shoes? What about making them?: http://www.lulu.com/product/ebook/making-a-primitive-sewing-kit-and-a-pair-of-moccasins/11191315
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 05 May 2007, 13:00:30

I buy grass-fed beef locally. Good stuff, even raw.

Roll up a ball of hamburger. Salt and pepper it. Chow down. Good!
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby Lore » Sat 05 May 2007, 13:52:45

I like my Bambi with cranberry sauce, some fava beans and a nice Chianti.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby Jack » Sat 05 May 2007, 13:58:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('happycrop', 'M')odern 'cows' and 'pigs' that have had their wild instincts largely bred out of them by human selection, look much more different to their ancestors than GM carrots look to non-GM carrots. How can we know how different their nutritional content might be to that which our ancestors consumed, even if uncooked?



Darn right! So stick to things that are standardized and predictable - McDonalds quarter pounders, MREs (the beef enchilada always a favorite!), and chicken tenders from almost anyplace!

Add ketchup...now that's good eatin'!

8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 14:33:34

Can no one see how ridiculous this is? Some of you people should be disgusted with yourselves. Do the kids in your neighbourhoods see you behave like that? Utterly shameful. I'm getting out of here before it skews my view of healthy human conduct. If the subject weren't important, I'd attempt to give you the social training your parents should have by ignoring you until you speak with consideration and decent manners. I suspect that you're all older than me, yet your seniority actually earns you minus points in the respect stakes when it proves to have failed to be able to produce better grace. I've never known anyone be so rude and confrontational, whatever age and mental capacity. If this is the face of the peak oil community, no wonder it's slow gaining recruits. I'd rather starve than subsist in that kind of community. Seriously. We're social mammals, most of us.

Torjus: Image search vegans or meet some to find your answer.

killJOY: My agenda is what I hope everyone's on this site is. Sustainable living. Animal husbandry is unsustainable with such a large population (I'd be amazed if most people here didn't know that, given the detail in which they know the other issues), so I'm letting people know they don't have to get malnourished without it or continue to waste land and resources in using it to poison themselves.

Gideon: I don't study Sociology and have never had the desire. My interests are science and health, hence I'm going to study Nutrition and Dietetics formally.

Cooked food is tastier (as are many harmful chemicals we use to preserve or flavour it). That's probably why the vast majority of human societies adopted it en mass. Incidentally, cooking vegetables unnecessarily is also detrimental. The before and after of nutritional content is shocking.

I believe cows' milk is considerably more unhealthy than meat. Certainly your method is much better than the industrial way, but you can't get past the natural proteins and hormones (one of which is known to contribute to tumour growth) implicit to a product that is designed to make a heavy, three-stomached, small-brained animal grow very large, very fast. Not to sustain any other, vastly differently-designed species into adulthood. There is plenty of webspace devoted to that debate, but to get you started, you might want to google it alongside 'autism', 'ADHD' 'schizophrenia', 'asthma', 'eczema', 'osteoporosis' and 'cancer'.

I don't want to get into an ethics debate here. I'm sorry that others have given the impression that that's what the thread is about, but notice I never once made a value judgement in the OP. I'm not touching that one with a 80 foot pole, seeing how defensive people get about biology.

Jack: What I mean is that all cattle are drastically different from the days before unnatural selection. Without exception.

Anyway, I hope you all get something positive out of this forum and can cure your anti-social tendencies in time for whatever the future brings.

Bye.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby NEOPO » Sat 05 May 2007, 14:41:40

Jack - Yeah man but you only like ketchup because it resembles human blood! :lol:

I on the other hand worship the Goddess of Tomato goodness and could probably eat them with all my meals or even make a complete meal with them.

As far as animals go we are going to try goats, chickens and/or ducks and rabbits.

Goats for milk for cooking and the free lawn service they provide.
Chickens for their eggs, excellent fertilizer and leaner meat plus their services in the garden.
Rabbits for their excellent fertilizer, their fur and leaner meat.

We might continue using some beef but it will probably be something we trade for in the future. Fresh organic beef is quite a delicacy especially considering the EROEI yet I also am having a hard time imagining not enjoying the occasional Hamburger or steak fillets mixed with sauce, sauteed onions, peppers and mushrooms.... <belly growls> :)

We probably do not need animal products to eat yet to survive post peak I think so. We have a slight problem called erosion and chemical fertilizers to replace. Not sure how we are going to do this without help from the animals.
Give us your poop please 8)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 05 May 2007, 15:01:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('happycrop', 'C')an no one see how ridiculous this is? Some of you people should be disgusted with yourselves.

I'm not. Meat. Mmmmrgh. Finger lickin' gooood. It was alive. Now it isn't. Nature is elegant in its cruelty, my friend.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 05 May 2007, 15:06:46

Oh, my. We're so naughty here. It's almost, like . . . well, a FEEDING FRENZY.

My final word on the subject, lest my BAITING seem to make me out to be too much of a brute:

1. We grow and eat far more vegetables than meat. I love plants.

2. The meat we eat comes largely from our farm: pork, chicken, turkey. Beef is grown nearby. I try to eschew store-bought meat.

3. We drink whole milk right outen our cow. Make yogurt, cottage cheese, butter.

Life is good. And tasty!
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby DavidFolks » Sat 05 May 2007, 15:11:11

Well Happycrop, I guess I have to weigh in.

I'm not going to go on about moral stances or opinion about what a human being needs to eat to be healthy.

I agree that human beings are designed with the capacity to derive nourishment from several sources, and do not necessarily need to eat meat.

If you look at historical Inuit culture though, you'll find that humans can survive with very little in the way of plant matter as well.

The point to this post is twofold:

1) We are lucky to live in a culture that allows us the choice of being vegan. While we can live on plant matter only, it is only a sustainable choice in areas where we can grow everything sufficient to our dietary needs. In some areas, growing seasons are not conducive to raising the plants in combinations we need for balanced nutrition, and we supplement with animal proteins and fatty acids.

2) Cost of energy to ship sufficient variety of plant nutrients to supply our dietary needs is where the peak oil effect comes into play. Local fruits, vegetables, nuts, and animal proteins from small, diverse farms are a sustainable way to feed communities. Shipping food around the world is not.
If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research. ~A. Einstein

TANSTAAFL ~R.A.H.

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is today. ~Chinese proverb
User avatar
DavidFolks
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 15:18:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('happycrop', 'C')an no one see how ridiculous this is? Some of you people should be disgusted with yourselves.
I'm not. Meat. Mmmmrgh. Finger lickin' gooood. It was alive. Now it isn't. Nature is elegant in its cruelty, my friend.

Please, please tell me you simply haven't read the thread in order to realise what I was actually referring to. Because if you think that's an OK way for adults to behave... I just hope you really don't get to meet people offline, ever.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 05 May 2007, 15:29:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('happycrop', 'P')lease, please tell me you simply haven't read the thread in order to realise what I was actually referring to. Because if you think that's an OK way for adults to behave... I just hope you really don't get to meet people offline, ever.

Behave how? There is no malice here, just ridicule. That happens, seen it myself. A grown man or woman should be able to handle it. A lot of kids these days are worse, can't see the boundaries.

And I have met online people offline on many an occasion. Haven't met a psycho yet!

Nothing wrong with eating meat by the way. It is a valid lifestyle choice. What a man and a woman do with a knife and fork in the privacy of their own home (or a licensed establishment) should concern no-one.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: We don't need animal products.

Unread postby happycrop » Sat 05 May 2007, 16:24:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gideon', 'M')ost of the "dieticians" I have ever met couldn't tell you the compositional difference between fat and carbs.

I agree and intend to reverse that trend by educating myself about how food works in the real world.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')eople didn't adopt cooking because it was tastier - it became tastier because it was a health advantage to eat it cooked.
It's called evolution. Those who ate food raw died of disease. Those who liked the taste of food cooked killed the pathogens before eating the meat, and lived to reproduce.

Funny, other species seem to think cooked food tastier too, and they haven't evolved eating it. I see no evidence that your hypothesis is more valid than mine.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') believe cows' milk is considerably more unhealthy than meat.
This is too generic to be useful. What kind of milk? Cow whole milk? What kind of meat? Bison? Beaver?

All of it. Some worse than others.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') but you can't get past the natural proteins and hormones (one of which is known to contribute to tumour growth) implicit to a product that is designed to make a heavy, three-stomached, small-brained animal grow very large, very fast.
This is the kind of unscientific garbage that kills your credibilty and ensures that your only audience will be other hysterical people.
Here's the thing - you have no idea what the molecular make up of a "protein" or a "hormone" is. You have no idea how proteins and hormones are broken down or taken up in humans.
It is arrogant to make such assumptions into statements. I have formal education in the chemistry of protein and carbohydrates, among other nutrients.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')urther, it is entirely irrelevant that the thing producing the milk has 3 stomachs or a high growth rate. That's like saying "you shouldn't eat apples because they come from giant woody things with holes and they support insect infestations."
It's absolutely nothing like saying that. Such analogies ruin your credibility more than mine. I was merely pointing out that cows, whom the milk is originally designed for, are quite obviously designed and made differently to humans, and so any chemicals are going to effect them differently. Therefore it should never have been assumed as it was that cows' milk was safe for human consumption without empirical or at least theoretical evidence.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich gets back to - why is having a cow in my backyard a problem for vegans? To argue that the cow's milk is unhealthy for me is, in my opinion, silly, ignorant, and unscientific. To argue that it isn't is, in my opinion, all of those things plus dangerous.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o it's a moral argument. The poor cow hates his existence or something to that effect. I don't agree.
How many times must I say it? I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT. Changing the subject is evasive, I suppose because you can not explain to me how, for example, consuming a product containing cancer-causing chemicals does not contribute to cancer, or how consuming casein when due to metabolic abnormality your body breaks it down into a drug, will not have a drug-like effect on brain and behaviour.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nybody who seriously argues that milk from a family cow or eggs from the chickens in the back of the farm house are a health risk that <b>must be avoided</b> is, implicitly [note correct use of word], making a value statement. We have different values. We share the value that animals should not be made to suffer. We do not share your value that it is wrong to use animals to make human life easier.
Not ONCE have I implied that. Look, I give up. I get it. You people don't want to discuss my OP. God only knows why, but you'd much rather ignore my actual argument and give me your philosophical crap instead, which I have NO INTEREST IN. I really could not care less what you think of vegetarianism, because many of you may be stuck with it whether you like it or not, or future generations will be, whom you could pass some of the knowledge down to. Believe it or not, I was actually trying to be helpful with regard to feeding yourselves. I would have been happy to answer challenges to my logic or those of the pages I linked to, but perhaps you're too scared they're right. I have no way of knowing, because you haven't addressed them. By address them, I mean 'so cobalt allows us to absorb B12? But that can't be true because...' or 'Are the nutrients really obtainable through plants? What about ___?' Instead I get 'that's wrong and stupid, and you're wrong and stupid and self-righteous, and here's why I like meat!' There was self-righteousness on this thread, but it didn't start from me.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'T')here is no malice here, just ridicule. That happens, seen it myself. A grown man or woman should be able to handle it. A lot of kids these days are worse, can't see the boundaries.
And I love how they just assumed this stranger on a forum was an adult and could take it. There are many very vulnerable, insecure people online, and that's irresponsible. Offline, would you expect or condone people saying the things said to me to a complete stranger, over a discussion about anything at all? Would calling it 'just ridicule' justify it? Maybe it's a cultural clash, but where I come from that has the potential to be very hurtful and constitutes bullying or at least atrocious manners. I don't know any young people who communicate like that, and I've interacted with them almost everyday for 13 years. There's one middle-aged man who currently comes close, but it's not considered healthy and his mother gave him up to social services because as a teenager it affected her so badly.

Anyway, I think I really won't return this time. I don't like the person this place has made me become. No hard feelings, eh? Genuinely. I suddenly have no hard feelings anymore. No one's perfect, and we're all imperfect in our own unique ways. Anger, and any counter-love emotion, is illogical. Good luck and good night everyone.
User avatar
happycrop
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron