Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby mmasters » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 13:29:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ASHINGTON – Brandy Bridges heard the claims of government officials, environmentalists and retailers like Wal-Mart all pushing the idea of replacing incandescent light bulbs with energy-saving and money-saving compact fluorescent lamps.

So, last month, the Prospect, Maine, resident went out and bought two dozen CFLs and began installing them in her home. One broke. A month later, her daughter's bedroom remains sealed off with plastic like the site of a hazardous materials accident, while Bridges works on a way to pay off a $2,000 estimate by a company specializing in environmentally sound cleanups of the mercury inside the bulb.

With everyone from Al Gore to Wal-Mart to the Environmental Protection Agency promoting CFLs as the greatest thing since, well, the light bulb, consumers have been left in the dark about a problem they will all face eventually – how to get rid of the darn things when they burn out or, worse yet, break.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55213
Last edited by mmasters on Sat 21 Apr 2007, 13:41:03, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Have Dangerous Side

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 13:35:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')There's no way out."--Robert Newman
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 16:04:42

"Compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) last far longer and use electricity more efficiently than conventional incandescent bulbs. Buy them if you can. They do contain a minuscule amount of mercury -- roughly four milligrams, or an amount the size of the period at the end of this sentence. (By comparison, a watch battery can contain up to 25 milligrams of mercury.) Hence, when a compact fluorescent bulb has reached the end of its long life, you should, if possible, take it to a hazardous-waste disposal facility rather than dumping it in the trash.

That said, the mercury in compact fluorescent bulbs currently does not pose a major problem -- and you know I don't take pollutants lightly. In municipalities such as Grist's hometown of Seattle, which is emphasizing conservation as a cost-cutting measure and pushing CFLs to the point of sending them free to ratepayers, there is an attendant concern about the solid-waste-disposal effects down the road. But let me emphasize: The tiny punctuation of mercury should not stop you from buying CFLs, any more than it stops you from wearing a watch.

One final note: Burning fossil fuels to generate electricity creates mercury pollution. Thus using compact fluorescent bulbs actually reduces mercury pollution, because CFLs use far less electricity than incandescent bulbs."
http://www.grist.org/advice/ask/2003/01 ... a-mercury/

"Is it true that CFLs contain mercury? Why and how much?
CFLs contain a very small amount of mercury sealed within the glass tubing - an average of 5 milligrams (roughly equivalent to the tip of a ball-point pen). Mercury is an essential, irreplaceable element in CFLs and is what allows the bulb to be an efficient light source. By comparison, older home thermometers contain 500 milligrams of mercury and many manual thermostats contain up to 3000 milligrams. It would take between 100 and 600 CFLs to equal those amounts.

There is currently no substitute for mercury in CFLs; however, manufacturers have taken significant steps to reduce mercury used in their fluorescent lighting products over the past decade.

Download the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fact sheet on Mercury in CFLs. (PDF, 17 KB)"

http://www.gelighting.com/na/home_light ... m#mercur...



"Q 2: I've heard CF bulbs have dangerous levels of mercury in them. What happens if I break one? Can I throw it in my garbage?

A 2: CF bulbs have about 4.0 milligrams of mercury in them to assist with starting. A troy ounce of mercury equals 31 grams, so 4.0 milligrams is about 1/1,000 of that amount. That amount of mercury is about the volume that would fill the size of the period at the end of this sentence. That amount of mercury is not dangerous in the home, but only becomes problematic when large amounts of CF bulbs are disposed in waste dumps.

If you accidentally break a CF bulb, the broken glass is more problematic than the mercury, as what mercury is left will be released into the air in a gaseous state."

http://www.seattle.gov/light/Conserve/R ... v5_lw2.htm
Ludi
 

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby pedalling_faster » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 16:17:45

there's a pharmacy on Geary in San Francisco that is selling these for $1 for 2 bulbs; they are well-stocked.

my personal gripe with these is - i was cleaning in the boudoir and broke one. i didn't know for sure about the mercury but the dust & glass shards - to use a California term - GNARLY.

i think it's better to use low-wattage incandescents in locations where they are more likely to get broken.
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Falconoffury » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 21:44:41

I believe that LED lighting technology uses even less energy for the amount of light produced. It would be nice if someone developed a way to make those comparable to standard light bulbs in size and light intensity.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 22:18:31

Mercury is an extremely hazardous substance. It is also volatile at high temperatures. Whose bright idea was it to sell lightbulbs with mercury in them?

You couldn't find a more FRAGILE, UNSAFE container for mercury than a lightbulb.

Perhaps we should have warning labels or laws prohibiting the use of fluorescent bulbs in children's rooms, schools, etc.?



"Mercury exposure in very young children can have severe neurological consequences, preventing nerve sheaths from forming properly. Research has been done that demonstrates the inhibitory effect that mercury has on myelin, the building block protein that forms these sheaths.[1]
Mercury poisoning in the young is suspected as a possible cause of autistic behaviors....."
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby frankthetank » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 00:22:09

Power plants spew out mercury from coal burning, so yeah, i doubt whats in lights is any worse...
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 02:11:22

Power plants are also sewing out small amounts of radioactive wastes. But the real truth is, the overall environmental impact of flourescent lightbulbs is reduced over incandescient ones.

LED lightbulbs are rapidly improving. Indoor pot growers are starting to fancy the prospect of using them due to their low energy consumption per lumen emitted. The overall amount of lumens per each unit of space dedicated to generating light with LED bulbs is still low compared to flourescents and incandescents(a 9W LED bulb built to fit a 60W incandescent socket will generate about half the light of the incandescent), and the cost per unit is very expensive due to relatively low volume($70-90 for a 9W LED bulb is the lower end of the price range). Give it five to ten years. The current industry making incandescent lightbulbs is none too thrilled with LED versions, given their 100,000+ hour life.


Basically, here's a breakdown:

Incandescent: ~20 lumens per watt, 1000 hour life
Flourescent: ~60 lumens per watt, 15000 hour life
LED: ~50 lumens per watt, 100000 hour life
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 04:04:03

In the past asbestos insulation was put into schools to "save energy."

Now we know asbestos can cause lung cancer.

Now we are putting fluorescent light bulbs into schools to "save energy."

We already know mercury is a dangerous poison, especially to children.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby dukey » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 06:56:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e already know mercury is a dangerous poison, especially to children.


that's why it's in vaccines.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Newsseeker » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 08:58:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e already know mercury is a dangerous poison, especially to children.


that's why it's in vaccines.


and fish...
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Aaron » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 09:18:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')...what mercury is left will be released into the air in a gaseous state."


8O
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 13:17:05

"Fluorescent lamps are in fact the best choice because of their energy efficiency, but they also contain mercury, a highly persistent and toxic chemical that is building up to dangerous concentrations in fish, wildlife, and human beings throughout the US. For this reason, INFORM recommends buying fluorescent lamps with the lowest mercury content possible, and ensuring that they are recycled at end of life to prevent the release of mercury to the environment."

http://www.informinc.org/fact_P3fluorescentlamps.php

Seems reasonable. The toxic effects of mercury are well established.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 13:53:20

Thanks for posting this!

I figure by the time they make mercury-less bulbs illegal TSWHAHTF so it won't matter too much.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby sysfce2 » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 18:44:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')ow we are putting fluorescent light bulbs into schools to "save energy."

Are you serious? Schools have used fluorescent lights for decades without problems - not to mention their widespread commercial and industrial use.
Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on. -- Winston Churchill
User avatar
sysfce2
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 18:58:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sysfce2', 'A')re you serious? .


Are you in the business of selling mercury? You think just because fluorescent bulbs are used in schools they are safe?

Please remember that schools also used asbestos insulation for decades without problems - not to mention their widespread commercial and industrial use.

People then trusted that it would be ok. However, Its turned out to be a big mistake.

Asbestos is a carcinogen. Did you know that?

Sometimes its better to identify problems with hazardous chemicals BEFORE they are widely used in commercial products. The mere fact they are used in schools doesn't make them safe.

It turns out that mercury is highly toxic and will accumulate through time in the environment. Extremely small amounts of Mercury can be highly damaging to developing children. Did you know that?

Its just common sense to be very careful with this hazardous chemical, especially around schools.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 19:05:47

Most compact flourescent bulbs are made in China and most are sold through WALMART.

States in the USA are just waking up to the environmental hazards associated with fluorescent bulbs

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... t=1&f=1001

"Mercury is a potent neurotoxin, and it's especially dangerous for children and fetuses."
--npr story on fluorescent bulbs
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Zentric » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 20:39:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'M')ost compact flourescent bulbs are made in China and most are sold through WALMART.

States in the USA are just waking up to the environmental hazards associated with fluorescent bulbs

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... t=1&f=1001

"Mercury is a potent neurotoxin, and it's especially dangerous for children and fetuses."
--npr story on fluorescent bulbs


I'm curious to know the conviction of your position, Plantaganet.

(1) Should we shut down the coal power plants?

(2) Should we stop eating seafood?

(3) Should we ban all lighting using conventional screw fixtures?

(4) Are the CFs made in China or sold at Walmart inherently more dangerous than those made or sold elsewhere?
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 20:48:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'P')ower plants spew out mercury from coal burning, so yeah, i doubt whats in lights is any worse...



Mercury releases from coal at power plants do not make mercury releases in schools or homes from broken fluorescent lights any safer or any more acceptable.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Energy-Saving Fluorescents Are Dangerous

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Apr 2007, 20:56:47

Mercury is similar to lead in that both are heavy metals and neurotoxins.

Lead paint was once thought to be safe for schools and homes, but is now banned.

Mercury is probably even more toxic then lead.

Signs/symptoms of Mercury Poisoning

Muscle cramps or tremors
Headache
Tachycardia
Intermittent fever
Acrodynia
Personality change
Neurological dysfunction
Can produce severe birth defects
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests