by Carlhole » Sat 23 Sep 2006, 17:48:56
Well, in the case of "The Devils", I'm not a "devils" advocate, I'm afraid. I picked up the book a couple of years ago because it supposedly anticipated the Bolsheviks by 60 years, and I was looking for some comparison to our own Neocons, who, to me, are like devils - and besides, it was Doestoevsky! and guaranteed to expand my mind, right?
It didn't. It read sort of like a tired old soap opera. In fact, it was published originally in serial form in a newspaper. And it was immensely popular in Russia amongst the masses. I believe D was simply catering to his plebian audience' tastes and making some money which his publisher was always urging him to do (actually, the story of Doestoevsky's promises, betrayals and other shenanigans with his publisher would be a good story in itself). I managed to get half way through it before I chucked it down as poppycock.
The only other D I've read is "Crime and Punishment" which was better, I thought. I really liked the first part of the novel in that it was a study of a student's psychological deterioration after the commital of a horrid crime. But the ending wasn't as satisfying as the beginning, I thought. It sort of had a uncharacteristic happy ending. One expects harsh truth and bitter reality from the Russian mind.
Doestoevsky's actual life is an interesting story. I haven't read a biography but I bet I would enjoy it more than the author himself. He had been imprisoned in Siberia for a decade or so and it had a tremendous effect on him.
So, read "The Devils" and tell me what you think. I probably don't completely understand Doestoevsky like an academic would. If it consoles you, I didn't like Joseph Conrad's "Under Western Eyes" either, in which he tries to mimic Doestoevsky's art, an art which was always so talked about in intellectual circles well into the 20th century.
But I HAVE read alot of Tolstoy who is sort of comparable to Conrad. Tolstoy really shines, in my opinion, in his vivid descriptions of Russian military campaigns - the encampments, the uniforms, the soldier's habits, personalities, the weather and landscape, the odor of everything, the Muslim (usually) enemy, everything is brilliantly described.
I read "War and Peace" after reading alot of his earlier and shorter stuff which academicians say were prelude and preparation for his large, long works. But I enjoyed the earlier tales more, I think. War and Peace also read like a long, long soap opera. It might be part of a Russian taste in literature, at least in the 19th century. After reading it, I immediately knew from whence Herman Wouk's "The Winds of War" had sprung.
Personally, I like to read for the elegance of language. and that's why I like Conrad so much. Tolstoy for the same reason yet less so.
You might be able to find Conrad's "Tales of Unrest" somehere for a quarter also. It's a collection of 6 novellas which are all completely different in setting and subject. In elegance of language, I think they were the zenith of Conrad's talent for imagery, although I've never heard of anyone else say that.