Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The ethics of revenge

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Miki » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 14:44:48

[web]http://www.monabaker.com/pMachine/more.php?id=61_0_1_36_M6[/web]

We all have a lot to learn from him.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 15:11:28

This poor man reminds me of Nick Berg's father.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Jack » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 15:42:35

Ah, yes, ethics. The world purports to love the peaceful - as it kills them. People advocate turning the other cheek - as they abuse those who do.

Peace can only be achieved be eliminating the enemy utterly. Ethics is merely a social construct, created by the comfortable living in a world created by hard men using harsh methods. It should be noted that survivors and the children of survivors speak of ethics. The broken, dead, and defeated, do not.

Moral: The highest ethic is survival.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 16:36:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')thics is merely a social construct, created by the comfortable living in a world created by hard men using harsh methods. It should be noted that survivors and the children of survivors speak of ethics. The broken, dead, and defeated, do not.

Moral: The highest ethic is survival.


I have to disagree with this completely. Ethics is about balance within a system. You could say it's a "dog eat dog" world or "kill or be killed", but it's a bit more complicated than that. Even two enemy nations are part of a system. The problem with war, is that almost always, nobody wins (except the investors and other rich people who aren't directly involved). Peace is usually the greatest victory for the greatest number of people.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 16:44:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'l')iving in a world created by hard men using harsh methods. It Peace is usually the greatest victory for the greatest number of people.
So you don't believe those ideas that war is engrained into the human psyche as an evolutionary thing? DNA telling us to war? Maybe we're supposed to go to war like a forest fire is part of natural ecology.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 17:08:33

War is a method by which the few control the many. It is an evolved practice, but not the only evolved practice. I happen to believe that the branch of evolution that promotes peaceful methods to preserve the largest possible view of the world to be the most superior.

The human race can survive with war, but there are other ways. I am reminded of the last thing the Nox leader said to SG-1 in Stargate SG-1. "Perhaps one day you will learn that your way is not the only way."
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Jack » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 17:23:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'I') happen to believe that the branch of evolution that promotes peaceful methods to preserve the largest possible view of the world to be the most superior.


This appears to be something like "the meek shall inherit the earth".

By this standard, the sheep are superior to the wolf. Maybe. But the wolf eats a lot of mutton dinners; the sheep eat few wolf dinners.

I also note that warfare, and the preparation for war, have been one of the main priorities of humankind for the past 4000 years - at least. When will this peaceful approach of which you speak triumph? Not during my lifetime, I dare say! 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 17:32:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '
')I also note that warfare, and the preparation for war, have been one of the main priorities of humankind for the past 4000 years - at least. When will this peaceful approach of which you speak triumph? Not during my lifetime, I dare say! 8)
There was a recent book detailing archaeological evidence that shows that prehistorical humans were every bit as warlike and more for as far back as we can look. There must be an ecological/evolutionary reason for this.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby rogerhb » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 17:32:45

Israel is a country which has not matured past "an eye for an eye".
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby venky » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 17:40:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'A')h, yes, ethics. The world purports to love the peaceful - as it kills them. People advocate turning the other cheek - as they abuse those who do.

Peace can only be achieved be eliminating the enemy utterly. Ethics is merely a social construct, created by the comfortable living in a world created by hard men using harsh methods. It should be noted that survivors and the children of survivors speak of ethics. The broken, dead, and defeated, do not.

Moral: The highest ethic is survival.


True, but those individuals who refuse to abide by the ethics of the society become a danger to society itself; and society has ways of dealing with deviant behavior
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Zardoz » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 18:11:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '.')..those individuals who refuse to abide by the ethics of the society become a danger to society itself; and society has ways of dealing with deviant behavior.

Jack refuses to come to terms with that.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Chaparral » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 18:17:41

If there is an "other way" is must be an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Thus far my limited study of history and my more extensive interaction with real live humans has told me that turning the other cheek is not evolutionarily stable. It is an invasible strategy and such strategies are doomed to fall into the dustbin of history.

I'd argue that the road to an "other way" if one exists, begins with dispensing once and for all this moralistic bullshit that is fed to children and other gullible things and by acknowledging what we human beasts really are. Once that is understood, then we can forge ahead.

I'd look to the writings of Dawkins, E.O. Wilson, Denett, Pinker and others for the initial road markers. An evolutionary understanding of things is worth trying now that we have seen the behaviorist school run its course.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Chaparral » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 18:32:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'A')h, yes, BAD GUYS RULE!!!!!


True, but those individuals who refuse to abide by the ethics of the society become a danger to society itself; and society has ways of dealing with deviant behavior


It could be argued as Leo Strauss and others do, that there are different types of humans amongst us. Some types will naturally be better poker players than others. Some will be better actors and con-men then others. It could be hypothesized that those with such psychological makeup will tend to rise to the corridors of power and do the governing while those who are ruled by surges of emotion derived from senses of guilt, pity, compassion, loyalty, principle, righteousness, indignation etc etc will stay towards the middle or the bottom.

The sociopaths that rule other men will stay undetected because they will be good actors. I can enact policies that result in the starvation of mothers and their children on one hand and pat babies and make cootchy cooing sounds to win the hearts of voting soccer moms with the other. I can include with the rhetoric, all requisite facial expressions and tones of voice to fool the soccer moms, just before i send their older sons off to fight and die for my offshore enterprises.

A "deviant" may well know himself and consider himself not a deviant but a Mandarin. Such a person will know enough to abide by the rules of joe sixpack when joe sixpack is looking and then distract joe sixpack when it's time to set policy.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Jack » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 18:48:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '
')True, but those individuals who refuse to abide by the ethics of the society become a danger to society itself; and society has ways of dealing with deviant behavior


Societal ethics are merely a tool for manipulation.

Societies do deal with illicit behavior; they may deal with offensive behavior. But, as Chaparral wrote, the clever deviant will reap rich rewards.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 20:39:25

The most ruthless and suspicious among us too often rise to the pinnacle of power and leadership and then use that position to their advantage, rather than to actually lead.

If there is an evolutionary purpose, for this phenomenon, it's for the led to be able to clearly identify the paranoid sociopathleader and prevent him/her from ascending the political, social and economic ladder.

The cleverest technique the sociopath uses is taking outdated scientific theory, describing the natural world and applying it to human political culture.

Social Darwinism is based on outdated science, and ignores more recent discoveries of natural cooperation like acquistion of new genomes, and cooperation among mycelial networks (mushrooms) and trees.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 28 Aug 2006, 20:47:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Social Darwinism is based on outdated science, and ignores more recent discoveries of natural cooperation like acquistion of new genomes, and cooperation among mycelial networks (mushrooms) and trees.
It was Richard Hofstadter who came up with Social Darwinism and it doesn't have much to do with Darwin, threadbear; it's political ideology. I'm sure Darwin would have been fascinated by these recent discoveries. I recall it was you who told us about Lynn Margulis's Acquiring Genomes. A very good read, indeed. I don't recall that she disputed natural selection, rather she wished to ammend it. Perhaps I'm misreading your post, though. OK, yes I am, but it just goes to show how discussions involving evolution and ethics can get very garbled. Different people talking about different things.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Miki » Tue 29 Aug 2006, 14:50:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chaparral', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'A')h, yes, BAD GUYS RULE!!!!!


True, but those individuals who refuse to abide by the ethics of the society become a danger to society itself; and society has ways of dealing with deviant behavior


It could be argued as Leo Strauss and others do, that there are different types of humans amongst us. Some types will naturally be better poker players than others. Some will be better actors and con-men then others. It could be hypothesized that those with such psychological makeup will tend to rise to the corridors of power and do the governing while those who are ruled by surges of emotion derived from senses of guilt, pity, compassion, loyalty, principle, righteousness, indignation etc etc will stay towards the middle or the bottom.


That's too simplistic an explanation IMO. Intelligence/talent, perseverance, and social savvy can lead both a psychopath and a decent person to a position of leadership. Indeed, research shows that most psychopaths end up being either drug addicts or criminals/jail inmates, and only the smart ones among them are successful. Moreover, no one is "governed by surges of emotion"; most decent people can put emotions aside and make objective decisions when necessary. Besides, the psychopatic decision-making process is not always the most rational or efficient.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby Chaparral » Wed 30 Aug 2006, 18:43:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chaparral', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'b')lah


blah blah


blah blah blah blah


That's too simplistic an explanation IMO. Intelligence/talent, perseverance, and social savvy can lead both a psychopath and a decent person to a position of leadership. Indeed, research shows that most psychopaths end up being either drug addicts or criminals/jail inmates, and only the smart ones among them are successful. Moreover, no one is "governed by surges of emotion"; most decent people can put emotions aside and make objective decisions when necessary. Besides, the psychopatic decision-making process is not always the most rational or efficient.


Ummm, intelligence, perseverance, social savvy and all that...that is how sociopaths learn very early on which behaviors result in rewards and which result in punishments. I am talking sociopaths here; those who feel no guilt, no loyalty, no compassion etc.

I have known plenty of people who let emotion cloud their judgement. It happens all the time, with interpersonal relationships, investment decisions, decisons on buying houses, cars, office politics you name it. I know some people who own investment properties who are too much of a pussy to even evict their own non-paying tenants; that is a classic example of emotion ruling logic.

Generally, the logic-based decision making process IS the most efficient, especially when it takes into account the emotions of others.

The Sociopath Next Door by Martha Stout might be an instructive read for you. There is a diverse body of opinion on the subject.

For my own safety and prosperity, I'd avoid the notion that most such people are in prison, on the streets or on drugs.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 30 Aug 2006, 21:43:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Social Darwinism is based on outdated science, and ignores more recent discoveries of natural cooperation like acquistion of new genomes, and cooperation among mycelial networks (mushrooms) and trees.
It was Richard Hofstadter who came up with Social Darwinism and it doesn't have much to do with Darwin, threadbear; it's political ideology. I'm sure Darwin would have been fascinated by these recent discoveries. I recall it was you who told us about Lynn Margulis's Acquiring Genomes. A very good read, indeed. I don't recall that she disputed natural selection, rather she wished to ammend it. Perhaps I'm misreading your post, though. OK, yes I am, but it just goes to show how discussions involving evolution and ethics can get very garbled. Different people talking about different things.


Social Darwinism is based on the "survival of the fittest" that forms the very backbone of neo-conservative ideology. Ironically, it's also the ideology of the sociopath. If I can beat so and so, then they deserve to be beaten. Multiple meanings for "beaten" here. This idea is lifted directly from Darwin's theory of evolution.

The theory applied to the natural world is now found to be limited, incomplete or in essence--outdated. If it is outdated for it's original purpose, to help describe the natural world, it's abundantly misdirected and misapplied to the human cultural, social and economic sphere. So there, Pal. :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The ethics of revenge

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 30 Aug 2006, 21:53:03

If you want to solve puzzles you need clues. Are you hiding behind clues?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron