[Kylon]

Feminism, A weapon of cultural destruction-



Feminism teaches women to be independent and equal. This is good. Feminism teaches women they do not need men completely, which is also good.
Feminism teaches women to fight against injustices(real and imagined) against them. This is good.
Feminism gives blind confidence(not always good), but confidence none the less. Which is good.

Feminism teaches women that man is the root of all evil, which is bad.
Feminism causes the woman to think she shouldn't be with a man, and instead should find ways of stealing what he has, and leaving, which is also bad.
Feminism teaches women, not to have kids, and that taking care of the home, and being a nuturer is bad. This is also bad.
Feminism teaches women, that like the slutty men of society, they should also be slutty(although there are a large number of unslutty men(such as myself)).
Feminism makes marriage so one sided and in favor of women through law, that no man in his right mind would get married under the current legal circumstances(unless he was dirt poor), this forces out of wedlock relationships, increasing the number of single mothers, and decreasing the actual involvement(and support of all kinds) to the children of the population, causing the quality of the offspring to decline.
Feminism teaches that abortion is good, killing your offspring is a blessing and right of womanhood. This is an atrocious practice, responsible for more deaths than world war II(50 million), and in the long term causes medical problems, and severe emotional problems for the women, causing the women to be less functional/capable.
Feminism teaches that men and women are natural enemies and competitors. This is awful, because neither sex is complete, both sexes have valuable contributions, and we have evolved to be dependent upon one another.

Essentially, I'm thinking this: Feminism causes all sorts of problems within the societies that practice it, and make the men lose much of their loyalty to that society(which most likely increasing the amount of loyalty that women have to that state, because they become a privileged class). Because that society screws the men over, they don't care for it as much, are less willing to defend and secure it, and less willing to spend resources preserving it, and are more inclind, and less restrained to rob, loot, plunder, and steal.

On top of these problems, feminism forces a transition, a change, a shifting of power, to occur. Whenever political battles are fought, it consumes resources, and generally overall weakens both sides(but not the side that wins).

My question is this: Why don't we use feminism as a weapon to destabilize societies we don't like? Feminism is good as a weapon. If we exported hardcore feminism to the enemies of the United States, it would both A) cause those societies massive amounts of internal strife, making their resolve, and thus their power to influence global change decrease, and B) Cause all of the problems associated with feminism, lower male loyalty, more divorces, fewer children, more children out of wedlock, pansified laws making the country both less able to defend itself, and less able to physically fight, emotional/medical damage due to abortions, turns men and women against one another, thus creating an internal war, making external war very, very difficult, more problems won't go into. C)Feminism frees women for the workplace, allowing more cheap labor in third and second world countries, as the men have to compete with women, ultimately lowering both of their salaries and benefiting mega corporations. D) Feminism lowers the birthrate, and thus the amount of resources consumed by that nation will decrease(in the long run), but in the short run due to womens enjoyment of aesthetics, cheaply made garbage(like most of the makeups) and other consumer products which cost little, but can sell for a lot could be sold to this people. Essentially a more gullible market for our corporations.

If we could only send feminism into third world nations that we didn't like, get it established, it would destablize them, make them weak, and then we could more easily control them.

What do you think?

[Atlantean_Relic]

You are making a case for a post nuclear conflict world, right?

[lotrfan55345]

Yes, I think now is the time to unleash the sacred feminine that hes been repressed for over 2000 years now.
Look at what has happened to the world in the past 2000 years with patriarichal (sp?) civilizations....

[PenultimateManStanding]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kylon', '
')What do you think?

[Kylon]

What I'm saying is what a wonderful weapon feminism would make against rival societies.

If you ruin the women, you ruin the children. If you ruin the children, you ruin the future.

So in essence, we could use this against societies we don't like, spend huge sums of money sending in feminazi agents to ruin their society, and then in the long run, their society would be plauged with misery, the men would lose loyalty, the homes would be broken, men would have less loyalty to their communities and less reason not to be criminals, and a whole slew of other horrible things would occur.

I'm saying feminism is good, it's good as a weapon. It's the cheapest way to ruin our competitors. If we were to send feminazi agents to Iran, and Iraq and if we could get the Arab women to revolt against the men there, then the Arab countries would really have a problem.

They would be so focused on fighting the internal conflict that it would be much more difficult for them to focus on us.


Of course I don't like feminism in the country I'm at. And of course I don't want it to go to countries where I plan on going to, to get a wife. Feminism is awful to it's host. And that's exactly why it makes a good cultural weapon.

I do not SUPPORT feminism within the United States, or any of the countries I like. However, I am a major supporter of feminism, in countries I dislike.

[PenultimateManStanding]

BTW, if you ever want to hear the most brief and profound piece of music you ever heard, tune into the Beatles, "Flying" my favorite.

[worrier]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat do you think?

[Kylon]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('worrier', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat do you think?

[galacticsurfer]

This is quite a funny suggestion, really. It even makes sense in a sick strange way. Export Western culture to the Arabs to defeat and demoralize them, then we could go back to traditional culture which they now have and win. This is really hilarious. I am rolling on the floor.

Women always had more power in northern european cultures(basis for western/USA culture) as everyone was important in a severe climate with short summers to prepare for long winters(no fruit just falling from the trees most of the year to exaggerate). If the man died the woman had to do everything alone for the family in Russia, Scandinavia, Britain, etc. so women's rights have just been overextended in the last few decades in a logical extension of our previous nothern European tradition now in a way which has unfortunately ended up being generally detrimental to the entire society in terms of familial and cultural cohesion. We call the ideology behind this extension of women's rights "feminism". As we all know any ideology is just a set of ideas which as always will end up being taken to their logical conclusion without regard to any practical matters. Scientific inventions have destroyed everything on earth although they were thought out as great ideas to save work and preserve lives for us for example. Communism was a great idea in and of itself for justice to people but tens of millions were murdered and imprisoned in dictatorships. Every religion is really right logically speaking but you can prove anything with logic and disprove it as well and then start a war over your conclusions.

Most younger women now are aware of the failings of the older generation of feminists. These radical feminists did not leave many kids so like any change in society only the changes which can be passed on remain long term. Conservative people have lots more kids everywhere in western societies. Women's rights were always stronger in certain societies than others due to simple climatic reasons. This will remain. Traditions outlast a generational blip of technology and social revolution. I do not think however that western culture has too much chance in Saudi Arabia, although fast food, western films, and bikinis seemed to be really enjoyed by lots of people in middle East before Iranian revolution. Egyptian and turkish women rebelled against head scarves long ago copying their European sisters in the 1920s. Japanese gals stopped walking 3 steps behind their men long ago and the communists in China unbinded the feet. However a lot still needs to be accomplished everywhere. Female infanticide is a very serious problem in Asia and female circumcision in Africa. Women are worth shit in the eyes of traditional cultures everywhere regardless of lip service at the UN. It is a shame but it is true. Female empowerment would solve the big problem of overpopulation and starvation as a woman who has control over her body has fewer kids and gives them good nutrition.

Feminism should remain a cuss word, woman'S rights should not.