Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 05:29:06

This demonstration by Alex Jones needs a rebuttal. And it seems right up SpecOp's alley, so take her away Spec...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('InfoWars', 'B')elow is a ten minute "see-for-yourself" report that conclusively shows that Vice President Dick Cheney's claims to Kennedy County Sheriff's Deputies in south Texas is a total fabrication.

A massive cover-up has been conducted concerning the shooting. We know that most of the facts that have been told to the public are manufactured frauds.

Cheney claims that he shot Whittington at 90 feet, ballistic tests from the spread of the shotgun pellets to their penetration depth is 100% conclusive.

Harry Whittington was shot at close range, between 15 and 18 feet, not the 90 claimed by Dick Cheney and the Secret Service. It is now clear why they refused to let Sheriff's Deputies interview Cheney for over 13 hours and why they claimed that Whittington's injuries were superficial when in truth they were grievous.

The mainstream media is ignoring this literal smoking gun evidence. Anytime they wish, the local police can conduct their own ballistics tests and they will have the exact same findings. The media can conduct their own tests. The ballistics of shotguns and birdshot is well known to tens of millions of Americans who hunt fowl.

We have now scientifically proved with an engineer and a police officer on-site conducting the test that the American people are being lied to and a cover-up is in progress.


[url=http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/cheney_shooting_scientific_proof.htm]
SCIENTIFIC PROOF CHENEY'S SHOOTING STORY A LIE [/url]
Carlhole
 

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 13:08:20

Looks like a pretty well conducted test with pretty reasonable conclusions to me. I'm not sure, really, how much difference it makes what the difference whether he was 90 feet or 18 feet away. Is he a dumb ass for shooting his hunting buddy? You bet. Negligent? I bet the guy could win a nice law suit. Probably won't get a conviction for criminal negligence though.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby Specop_007 » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 14:06:44

I took my phone off the hook. Had my 40 hours in on Tuesday and was in the office the rest of the week. Been a long week, and gotta go back for more later today.
Yay for overtime right? :-D

The test isnt entirely valid, nor is it entirely invalid. First and foremost, I havent followed the whole incident that closely. As far as I see it, its another hunting accident. They happen EVERY year, the only reason anyone suddenly gives a shit is because it was the VP that had it. No one seems to give a damn if its Joe People that has it though, so I've been rather disgusted with the whole deal.

Anyways, its well established ballistic mediums are not a real world test for bullets. They give you a very good idea what might happen, what may happen and what should happen, but they fail to take into account things such as tissue density differences (fat, muscles, sinew), they dont take into account bones and organs....
In other words, they give you a good idea what happens, but it wont always be 100% exact science. People have in the past shot animals such as hogs to get a better idea what happens, or organs from animals and whatnot but the fact is you just cant say with 100% certainty what WILL happen by using ballistic gels as your basis of comparison.
But its close, so you dont entirely rule it out altogether.

They say they bought a 28 gauge, is that what Cheney was using? I would have thought he'd go with the 12 bore, but hey, who knows? Not me, I havent followed it. Additionally, what choke was Cheney using? Was Cheney using handloads? Cheney is a pretty experienced gun guy as I understand it, so he may have been using reloads. I dont know. Does anyone?

Ultimately though I see no glaring errors with the tests that were performed by this guy. Most of it, while not 100% reliable, are generally accepted as accurate.

Like I said, I havent followed it much because the whole issue disgusts me.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 14:15:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'T')hey say they bought a 28 gauge, is that what Cheney was using? I would have thought he'd go with the 12 bore, but hey, who knows?


Ya'd think, but no. He was definitely using a 28 gauge.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 14:37:34

I just watched Mr. Wittington on cnn.

IMO to much bruising to be a 30 yd accident. IMO 30 feet or less. I bet it knocked the codger on his keester.
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 14:46:09

Image
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby gary_malcolm » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:02:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '
')Like I said, I havent followed it much because the whole issue disgusts me.


Weak.

No time for tirades when it's your man busted for 'tard-hunting, boozing and womanizing? Nice.

G
Gary Malcolm

US Empire

There is no alternative source for our gluttony. Power down or die.
gary_malcolm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue 26 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: US Empire

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:04:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UncoveringTruths', ' ')I bet it knocked the codger on his keester.

It's possible, but....

This whole business of people flying through the air from being shot with a firearm is a Hollywood concoction. When a firearm is fired there is conservation of inertia between the bullet going forward and the shooter going backward. Mass1 x velocity1= Mass2 x velocity2. The same thing happens when the bullet strikes the target M1xV1=M2xV2. So the amount of "shove" that you get from a bullet strike in never more than the amount of recoil that the shooter experienced. The further the target is away, the more of the velocity will have gotten lost to air resistance and the smaller the inertia will be. Bullets do a lot of damage because kinetic energy is MxVxV. Bullets have a small mass and a high velocity, so they have a comparatively small amount of interia, but lots of kinetic energy. That kinetic energy gets dispersed in a small place and that's what causes tissue destruction.

I've never shot a 28 gauge, but I can't imagine that the recoil is that much. All of the tiny little birdshot pellets loose velocity quick from air resistance, so the impact would be much less than the recoil even at close range. So...I guess what I'm saying is that if he fell down from this, it was because he was already pretty unsteady on his feet, or from his reaction to the startle of being shot.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby eric_b » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:04:17

To provide a contrary POV, check out this little video...

http://www.caller2.com/specials/2006/gu ... index.html

This guy seems to think a .28 gauge at 90 feet was capable of causing
the damage.

Hell if I know.

I will say I think there's more to this entire thing than we're being told.
How about all those rumors Cheney was sauced at the time of the accident :-D

(Not to mention the rumors of Bush doing nightcap shots of whiskey and
morning lines of coke in the White house. All I can do is laugh)
Last edited by eric_b on Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:23:27, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:13:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '(')Not to mention the rumors of Bush doing nightcap shots of whiskey and morning lines of cook in the White house. All I can do is laugh)


Hmmm...I would be more inclined to believe Dubya was doing coke. Doing the cook is more Clinton's style. :-D
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:13:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UncoveringTruths', ' ')I bet it knocked the codger on his keester.

It's possible, but....

This whole business of people flying through the air from being shot with a firearm is a Hollywood concoction. When a firearm is fired there is conservation of inertia between the bullet going forward and the shooter going backward. Mass1 x velocity1= Mass2 x velocity2. The same thing happens when the bullet strikes the target M1xV1=M2xV2. So the amount of "shove" that you get from a bullet strike in never more than the amount of recoil that the shooter experienced. The further the target is away, the more of the velocity will have gotten lost to air resistance and the smaller the inertia will be. Bullets do a lot of damage because kinetic energy is MxVxV. Bullets have a small mass and a high velocity, so they have a comparatively small amount of interia, but lots of kinetic energy. That kinetic energy gets dispersed in a small place and that's what causes tissue destruction.

I've never shot a 28 gauge, but I can't imagine that the recoil is that much. All of the tiny little birdshot pellets loose velocity quick from air resistance, so the impact would be much less than the recoil even at close range. So...I guess what I'm saying is that if he fell down from this, it was because he was already pretty unsteady on his feet, or from his reaction to the startle of being shot.


I agree with your theory on a single lead bullet. However a shotgun disperses it's energy. The bruising IMO indicates he was much closer than 30 yd's. A shotgun has a lot of knockdown power at close ranges. This actually from there own accounts (saw Harry fall) would indicate close range impact.
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:21:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'First, it has enormous stopping power at short range, more than nearly all handguns and comparable to most rifle cartridges. The wide spread of shot produced by the gun makes it easier to aim and to be used by inexperienced marksmen. Also, unlike a rifle bullet, each pellet of shot is less likely to penetrate walls and hit bystanders. It is favored by law enforcement for its low penetration and high stopping power while many American households use it as a home defense weapon for the same reasons.')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shotgun
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby eric_b » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:21:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '(')Not to mention the rumors of Bush doing nightcap shots of whiskey and morning lines of cook in the White house. All I can do is laugh)


Hmmm...I would be more inclined to believe Dubya was doing coke. Doing the cook is more Clinton's style. :-D


oops... where's that edit button? :-D
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby PrairieMule » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:26:21

I don't buy the "single lead bullet". A slug in a 28 gauge is contradictory. Slugs are for knocking down big targets and blowing locks off of doors, no way it would be used on a 28 gauge. They are for 12 gauges and you can find them in the 20 gauge. I believe no such round exists. That would be as silly as a Geo Metro with a Tow package to move a horse trailer.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:29:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UncoveringTruths', 'F')irst, it has enormous stopping power at short range


I think you are confusing "stopping power", i.e. a subjective estimation of ability to make someone stop what they are doing, with inertia which is defined as mass x velocity. The inertia of a shotgun blast can not physically exceed the inertia imparted on the shooter.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby seldom_seen » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:33:11

A 28 guage is certainly no canon. It's used to take down little pigeons and quail. I'd put my money on the guy being real darn close rather than far away.

I don't see how that shot could penetrate the guys clothing with one piece of shot reaching near his heart at 90 feet away.

The guy had to be close.

Cheney is on all sorts of heart medication, most of which comes with warnings about not operating machinery. Combine that with a beer or two at lunch. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.

The thing that really irks me is that we was poaching. heh. He wasn't even properly licensed to hunt quail in Texas. Couldn't bring himself to buy a 7 dollar quail stamp. Some may see that as a minor thing. It's very symbolic to me of the contempt for the law these people have.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:40:23

First hand experience, I shot a deer with 12 guage 00 Buckshot at 20 yards. Granted this is a much larger load than what we are discussing. The deer was 150#, said deer left its feet, and fell backward I stayed put.
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:40:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrairieMule', 'S')lugs are for knocking down big targets and blowing locks off of doors, no way it would be used on a 28 gauge.


Jees PM. Now that you're a moderator, you're going to have to be more open minded! Link

I don't think anyone was insinuating that Cheney was using slugs though. UncoveringTruths was, I believe questioning how conservation of momentum applies to the many individual projectiles in a shotgun blast. The answer is that their collective momentum acting on the shooter is the same as their collective momentum acting on the target minus whatever they loose from wind resistance.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 15:47:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UncoveringTruths', ' ')I bet it knocked the codger on his keester.

It's possible, but....

This whole business of people flying through the air from being shot with a firearm is a Hollywood concoction. When a firearm is fired there is conservation of inertia between the bullet going forward and the shooter going backward. Mass1 x velocity1= Mass2 x velocity2. The same thing happens when the bullet strikes the target M1xV1=M2xV2. So the amount of "shove" that you get from a bullet strike in never more than the amount of recoil that the shooter experienced. The further the target is away, the more of the velocity will have gotten lost to air resistance and the smaller the inertia will be. Bullets do a lot of damage because kinetic energy is MxVxV. Bullets have a small mass and a high velocity, so they have a comparatively small amount of interia, but lots of kinetic energy. That kinetic energy gets dispersed in a small place and that's what causes tissue destruction.

I've never shot a 28 gauge, but I can't imagine that the recoil is that much. All of the tiny little birdshot pellets loose velocity quick from air resistance, so the impact would be much less than the recoil even at close range. So...I guess what I'm saying is that if he fell down from this, it was because he was already pretty unsteady on his feet, or from his reaction to the startle of being shot.


I heard of a study that showed that Americans fall down when shot more than any other nation. Because American's have watched so many TV shows and movies where people get shot & fly through the air.

The telling number was that when they didn't know they were being shot, they fell in the same numbers as other nations do.

Depends on caliber & range of course.

I own an 12 Gage that would most definitely knock you down at close range with buckshot.

A also own a AR-15 that would never knock you down on it's own.

Course... they'll both kill you...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Call for SpecOp_007 on the White Courtesy Telephone...

Unread postby PrairieMule » Fri 17 Feb 2006, 16:41:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrairieMule', 'S')lugs are for knocking down big targets and blowing locks off of doors, no way it would be used on a 28 gauge.


Jees PM. Now that you're a moderator, you're going to have to be more open minded! Link

I don't think anyone was insinuating that Cheney was using slugs though. UncoveringTruths was, I believe questioning how conservation of momentum applies to the many individual projectiles in a shotgun blast. The answer is that their collective momentum acting on the shooter is the same as their collective momentum acting on the target minus whatever they loose from wind resistance.


My bad, I thought he was refering to slugs. Sorry UT! My posts on this subject have been consistant that something stinks ans Cheney was reckless. I'll throttle back.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron