Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I agree with Tucker Carlson

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby MicroHydro » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 00:27:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you really believe the U.S. government killed 3000 of its own citizens ... and lied about it and invaded Afghanistan as a result of something it did, you ought to leave the country.. because that's so terrible.. so evil, that your tax dollars go in to support it make you complicit in it. if you really believe that, you ought to leave.
- Tucker Carlson on MSNBC


I never thought that I would agree with that bowtie wearing nitwit. So there is a first time for everything.

Minor difference, I don't believe that the US did 911. I know it for a fact.

So when I learned the truth, almost a year ago, I went through the same thought process that Tucker Carlson outlines. My options were:
1) Passive resistance (nonpayment of taxes in particular).
Well that didn't work out too well for Al Capone, and I suspect the IRS would win that contest.
2) Active resistance. But there is no opposition party to the combined republican/democrat war party. And Gitmo has been prepared for any truly active resisters.
3) Submit to tyranny. Not in my nature.
4) Leave the country. Bingo! So I am out of reach of the looming special skills draft. And I don't pay US taxes anymore.

"Leave the country", when voiced by neocon operatives like *ucker Carlson can sound like a threat. It shouldn't. For people who find themselves trapped in a despised minority in the USA (like the 15% who agree with Darwin), leaving 'Merica is a blessing. And I will not be financing the next US atrocity.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 00:54:16

Physics is physics and its laws supercede anything enacted by a legislature. So, Dr. Steven E. Jones has said, "I don't go there" regarding the who, what, when, where, why of the events.

If it is established that the towers could NOT have collapsed as they are said to have done so - that explosives are the best explanation - that means that the physicist's job is over and someone else's job has just begun (hopefully).

What you are saying is that since the government couldn't possibly do something this awful, then the physics must be wrong. And that doesn't make sense.

Things just simply need to make sense to some people. Others are happy to ignore laws of nature but to some they stand out glaringly and uncomfortably. That glaring discomfort will not go away - so reasonable explanations for things like the collapse of WTC7 and the actual physics involved in the collapses of the Twin Towers are in order.

It is a scientific argument to explain how the 3 towers must have collapsed. It is a political argument to try to understand why. Tucker Carlson is a talking head on the political side of the 911 discussion. Dr. Steven E. Jones is on the physics side of the discussion. The two are not compatible.

The best thing to do is to investigate the events and address ALL the unanswered questions, first physical then political one step at a time.
Carlhole
 

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 01:01:20

Whoops! Misread your post.

(nevermind)
Carlhole
 

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby katkinkate » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 06:54:22

It's sad really. America used to be the country refugees from oppression used to want to go to, now people are trying to escape from it. :(
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby killJOY » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 07:58:46

The only way I, a skeptic of the "official" 9/11 story--though I have no opinion on what actually happened--would "leave" this country is if people like Fucker Carlson develop the 'nads to try to drag me out by my hair (and I have a buzzcut).

Carlson seems incapable of developing a sense of evil. He hasn't read classical drama or Shake-speare or anything else that would teach him that there is nothing--NOTHING--to prevent those in power from inflicting dread on the populous.

Check out his quote again:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you really believe the U.S. government killed 3000 of its own citizens ... and lied about it and invaded Afghanistan as a result of something it did, you ought to leave the country.. because that's so terrible.. so evil


Oops. A little slip? The "that's" is ambiguous. "That's" could refer back to the phrase "the U. S. government killed 3,000 of its own citizens." In which case I would agree.

But simply believing that something like that is evil is absurd. It's just keeping one's options open.

I cannot verify Ruppert, et al.

I cannot make up my mind about how the towers and WTC7 fell.

But I have no problem believing the US government--as rapacious a government as there's ever been--would orchestrate such a thing or simply permit it to happen.

I lean toward the latter. Why?

Because it went off too "without a hitch" for the former to have happened. I can't wrap my head around their agreeing to blow up the buildings IN BROAD DAYLIGHT and just hope no one noticed.

Finally, Katrina taught us all that this government is simply indifferent to human suffering and utterly incapable of doing anything reasonably sane about it.

So, for now, I side with "knew it was gonna happen, let it happen, reaped the benefits."
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby bobcousins » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 13:54:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'B')ecause it went off too "without a hitch" for the former to have happened.


Apart from the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania of course.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, for now, I side with "knew it was gonna happen, let it happen, reaped the benefits."


I would not be surprised to learn that Bushco had a policy of active ignorance when it came to news of a threat from al Quaeda. I recall one quote was "stop telling us about bin Laden, we are not interested". We know that the hawks were ready to take advantage of any attack. So by a policy of just not prioritising intel reports, either no attack occurs and it doesn't matter, or they get something they can capitalise on without apparent culpability.

But a far better plan would have been to have the hijackers as Iraqis, and not bother with the explosives. There is no need to demolish 3 buildings completely to enrage the US, and also you risk exposure of your plot by making it too complicated.

If these attacks were executed as a "perfect crime", they have singularly failed. They had to bend over backwards to make the link to Iraq, and downplay the hijackers real origin. If you are going to be so audacious to blow up buildings in broad daylight, why put your friends in the frame instead of your real target?

I think that Bush already had Iraq marked as a target well before 9/11. 9/11 was used as additional support to this agenda, but I suspect the attack on Iraq would have gone ahead without 9/11.
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 16:20:17

I make no distinction between the concepts of purposely letting it happen and reaping the benefits --organized opportunism with foreknowledge, and actually planning and implementing--conspiracy. It's splitting hairs to differrentiate, imposing too much meaning on technicalities, at the expense of the big picture.

Micro--You did the wisest thing by getting out. But how do you manage to avoid taxes? You must be planning to stay out of the country forever.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sat 19 Nov 2005, 03:44:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I') make no distinction between the concepts of purposely letting it happen and reaping the benefits --organized opportunism with foreknowledge, and actually planning and implementing--conspiracy. It's splitting hairs to differrentiate, imposing too much meaning on technicalities, at the expense of the big picture.

Micro--You did the wisest thing by getting out. But how do you manage to avoid taxes? You must be planning to stay out of the country forever.


Actually, the foolishness of the US government allows me to escape taxes legally. :lol: :lol: :lol:
The first US$80,000/yr of individual income earned overseas is not taxed by the US, only the nation of residence. My personal income does not cross this line, although my family income does. I am not taxed as marrried because the US doesn't honor my Canadian marriage. :lol: :lol: :lol:
However, it is also true that I have no intent of returning to the US while it is under the rule of those guilty of 911. My US friends and relatives might have to visit me.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I agree with Tucker Carlson

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Sat 19 Nov 2005, 13:41:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')evelation 18:4 Then10 I heard another voice from heaven saying, “Come out of her, my people, so you will not take part in her sins and so you will not receive her plagues, 18:5 because her sins have piled11 up all the way to heaven12 and God has remembered13 her crimes.14 18:6 Repay her the same way she repaid others;15 pay her back double16 corresponding to her deeds. In the cup she mixed, mix double the amount for her. 18:7 As much as17 she exalted herself and lived in sensual luxury,18 to this extent give her torment and grief because she said to herself,19 ‘I rule as queen and am no widow; I will never experience grief!’ 18:8 For this reason, she will experience her plagues20 in a single day: disease,21 mourning,22 and famine, and she will be burned down23 with fire, because the Lord God who judges her is powerful!”
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron