Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Mount Everest

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Mount Everest

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 16:29:56

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051009/ap_ ... ng_everest

It's now 12 feet smaller than measured in 1975. Perhaps that was its "inflation adjusted" high :lol: . Glad to see that we're not wasting money on unimportant studies :( .
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby SurvivalAcres » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 20:09:56

I read somewhere (couldn't have been HERE could it?) that the amount of oil being extracted from the ground is causing serious subsidence in various locations around the world.

Recently there was a rough calculation on how much oil is extracted and consumed daily - there was a picture of Niagra Falls and we were told to envision 2 hours worth of "flow" to represent the oil consumed daily - that is a LOT of volume.

Purely speculation on what's happening to Everest - but you have to wonder... probably the magma below is being rerouted elsewhere.
User avatar
SurvivalAcres
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue 29 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 22:10:02

'unimportant studies'? Maybe you think ice cores from Greenland are 'unimportant'. Scientific investigation is the most important thing going on in this world. We need to know what's happening real bad. It isn't easy because the data is mischievous.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 22:25:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ''')unimportant studies'? Maybe you think ice cores from Greenland are 'unimportant'. Scientific investigation is the most important thing going on in this world. We need to know what's happening real bad. It isn't easy because the data is mischievous.


I agree. Scientific research is what has gotten us to where we are today. We know more about the world around us then any other time in history. No give up research is to give up the essence of being human.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby fossilnut2 » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 22:34:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SurvivalAcres', 'I') read somewhere (couldn't have been HERE could it?) that the amount of oil being extracted from the ground is causing serious subsidence in various locations around the world.

Recently there was a rough calculation on how much oil is extracted and consumed daily - there was a picture of Niagra Falls and we were told to envision 2 hours worth of "flow" to represent the oil consumed daily - that is a LOT of volume.

Purely speculation on what's happening to Everest - but you have to wonder... probably the magma below is being rerouted elsewhere.


There is no connection between the height of Mt. Everest and oil extraction. I assume you were kidding but not everyone knows not to take such statements seriously.
User avatar
fossilnut2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Sun 09 Oct 2005, 23:19:20

Of course research is important, but there was no stated purpose for this expedition. All they determined is the they measured inaccurately in 1975. How does this help us like studying ice cores does?
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby Aedo » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 02:20:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Modernity', 'O')f course research is important, but there was no stated purpose for this expedition. All they determined is the they measured inaccurately in 1975. How does this help us like studying ice cores does?


Or they measured it inaccurately this time - what is the frame of reference and what is the expected error?
User avatar
Aedo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Mount Everest

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 15:49:48

They stated that the original measurement was off, I don't know how they decided that.
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron