Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby k_semler » Sat 17 Sep 2005, 23:40:26

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

I say it is time we follow the guidance of the Declaration of Independence.

http://www.dopcampaign.org/read_bill.htm

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')EC. 108. OFFICE OF ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT a) IN GENERAL- There shall be in the Department an Office of Arms Control and Disarmament, the head of which shall be the Assistant Secretary of Arms Control and Disarmament. The Assistant Secretary of Arms Control and Disarmament shall carry out those functions in the Department affecting arms control programs and arms limitation agreements.

(b) RESPONSIBILITIES- The Assistant Secretary of Arms Control and Disarmament shall-- (1) advise the Secretary on all interagency discussions and all international negotiations regarding the reduction and elimination of weapons of mass destruction throughout the world, including the dismantling of such weapons and the safe and secure storage of materials related thereto; (2) assist nations, international agencies and nongovernmental organizations in assessing the locations of the buildup of nuclear arms; (3) develop nonviolent strategies to deter the testing or use of offensive or defensive nuclear weapons, whether based on land, air, sea, or in outer space; (4) serve as a depository for copies of all contracts, agreements, and treaties that deal with the reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons or the protection of outer space from militarization; and (5) provide technical support and legal assistance for the implementation of such agreements

Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby boilingleadbath » Sun 18 Sep 2005, 00:57:52

How many civillians do you know who own nukes?
Must be interesting to know people like that...
boilingleadbath
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue 22 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: NW Pensylvania (U.S.A)

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby k_semler » Sun 18 Sep 2005, 01:15:01

Its the "Arms Control" and "Disarmament" that make me pissed off. If it were only about nuclear weapons, why not replace those terms with "Nuclear Non-Proliferation", and "Deactivation"? Plus the NPT was tried before. Look how successful that was. :roll: Oh yeah, I forgot. The DPRK doesn't have nukes, nor do India or Pakistan. :roll: Wasn't it in 1997 that they kept on doing nuke tests closer and closer to the border, and Newsweek was warning about a reigonal nuclear holocaust? That is 8 years after the Berlin wall got tore down.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby GreyGhost » Sun 18 Sep 2005, 04:07:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'i')t is their duty, to throw off such Government


The constitution does make it your duty to do this. You also have a mechanism to do it, impeachment. It's even legal.

According to the wikipedia article on impeachment in the US :
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tarting in 2003, a movement has spawned to impeach the current President, George W. Bush. A three-day telephone poll starting on June 27, 2005, conducted by Zogby International found that 42% of Americans would support impeachment if Bush lied about the reasons for going to war with Iraq.


If you really want it to happen, it would help for that 42% to be higher first. How to achieve this in three easy steps:
* reduce Bush's control over the media. The most popular news source for most americans (Fox News) is notorious for their unwillingness to criticize the government.
* wake people up to the fact that religion has no place in government. In most other first world countries, churchs would not dare to be so political
* generally, encourage people to be more aware of what their government is doing, to break them out of the "bread and circuses" mentality

On second thoughts, all the above takes to long. How about a bloody coup instead? Viva la revolution!
User avatar
GreyGhost
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed 31 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby Chocky » Sun 18 Sep 2005, 04:31:34

That agreement or office or whatever is only concerned with nuclear weapons.
User avatar
Chocky
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Land of Do-As-You-Please

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby k_semler » Mon 19 Sep 2005, 00:48:02

:x Only concerning nuclear weapons huh? Than why is this page: http://www.dopcampaign.org/stats.htm so concerned with handheld weapons, and not thermonuclear devices? It seems like the agenda is for civillian disarmament to me. As far as I am concerned, the UN can kiss my hairy ass. I WILL NOT bow down to a foriegn power telling me how to live my life, and what I can own or not. Wars were fought over less. :x
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby Shadizar » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 16:32:02

The movement to disarm is very alarming to me. When it comes down to it, individual ownership of weapons is the only power that "the people" have. History is full of dictators and madmen whose first acts where to disarm their people (and their enemies).

Disarming a populace to me means that you can no longer trust them. If you can't trust yourselves to behave like rational human beings then your society is already lost. I would rather trust my neighbor (or myself for that matter) than someone who lives hundreds of miles away, and may not be acting in my best interests.

This doesn't mean that firearms should be left out unsecured for children to stumble upon. Education and safety should come first when dealing with any weapon, be it a knife, axe, blowgun, or firearm.

Finally, criminals generally don't buy firearms legitimately anyway. All that disarming the general populace would do is make criminals stronger and cause the creation of an even larger black market. I for one will bury my guns and claim them "stolen" before giving up my firearms.

-Shadizar
User avatar
Shadizar
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun 24 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby k_semler » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 18:24:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shadizar', 'T')he movement to disarm is very alarming to me. When it comes down to it, individual ownership of weapons is the only power that "the people" have. History is full of dictators and madmen whose first acts where to disarm their people (and their enemies).

Disarming a populace to me means that you can no longer trust them. If you can't trust yourselves to behave like rational human beings then your society is already lost. I would rather trust my neighbor (or myself for that matter) than someone who lives hundreds of miles away, and may not be acting in my best interests.

This doesn't mean that firearms should be left out unsecured for children to stumble upon. Education and safety should come first when dealing with any weapon, be it a knife, axe, blowgun, or firearm.

Finally, criminals generally don't buy firearms legitimately anyway. All that disarming the general populace would do is make criminals stronger and cause the creation of an even larger black market. I for one will bury my guns and claim them "stolen" before giving up my firearms.

-Shadizar


Damn right! Absolutly nothing I disagree with you on. The only person that should make the decision if they are armed or not, is the person contemplating it.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Fri 23 Sep 2005, 01:45:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('boilingleadbath', 'H')ow many civillians do you know who own nukes?
Must be interesting to know people like that...


Nukes are not that hard to come across ..... you gotta read a book that came out recently called "The Radioactive Boy Scout" and nuke hobbiests are not as rare as you'd think......
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby ubercrap » Fri 23 Sep 2005, 10:17:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shadizar', '
')Finally, criminals generally don't buy firearms legitimately anyway.


Even though I'm fairly left-leaning, I've changed to a more pro-gun stance recently. However, I do believe that most guns used to commit crimes are stolen in burglaries from law abiding owners.
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Department of Peace: Disarm Civillians

Unread postby k_semler » Fri 23 Sep 2005, 14:57:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercrap', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shadizar', '
')Finally, criminals generally don't buy firearms legitimately anyway.


Even though I'm fairly left-leaning, I've changed to a more pro-gun stance recently. However, I do believe that most guns used to commit crimes are stolen in burglaries from law abiding owners.


Which is why you should always lock up your firearm if you are not using it immediatly, or is not a weapon being kept at the ready for defensive purposes. You don't leave your car or home unlocked when it is unattended, do you? You don't leave piles of cash sitting on the kitchen counter with your windows open when you aren't home, do you? You secure your knife in your sheath or pocket, when it is not being used, don't you? A firearm is no different. If not using it, and it is not a defensive weapon, lock it up like you would with anything else you don't want stolen.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron