by Tanada » Fri 05 Feb 2016, 12:58:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'T')anada this is a quote from Monte "In the EIA’s 2000 Energy Outlook, based upon historical trends, they projected oil demand in 2010 would be 96 mbpd and 115 mbpd in 2020. We are only consuming 94 mbpd in 2016. Had not the 2008 financial collapse occurred, would we be producing enough oil to meet demand? Even with the fracking boom and OPEC pumping flat out, we are only producing 96.5 mbpd, barely enough to have met projected demand in 2010, sixteen years ago." So, while overall demand has increased it has NOT increased as would be expected from historical trends. So that is in essence demand destruction.
MQ and I have disagreed about many things for many years now. Conflating a slower than projected rate of growth with no growth at all is typical of the sorts of things we disagree upon.
The world is so much more complex than even the best models can represent it isn't even funny, and the more simplistic you make the relationship the more room for error you put into the projections you make.
The EIA and IEA are political organizations first and foremost. That doesn't make them inherently evil, but it does color everything they do and say. Everyone has their set of beliefs that color how they view the world, a wise person tries to see issues from not only their own POV but also from other POV positions to try and fill in their own ideological blind spots.
Take the example you gave above. If all you do is look at the last 15 or 20 years it has the ring of truth to it. However if you extend your view back to 1970 and then look at it your POV must necessarily change. The 1973 oil shock and the 1979 oil shock and stagflation period had a sharp impact on world oil consumption. In fact it took about a decade for the 1980 world oil consumption rate to be exceeded. World oil consumption in 1980 was 63,122,000 bbl/d and it was lower than that for every year until 1989 when they rose to 64,978,000 bbl/d. In between those two years oil consumption world wide fell to 58,785,000 bbl/d in 1983 before resuming its climb. EIA numbers,
https://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/ ... &unit=TBPDSo yes, oil demand per year today does not match projections made 15 years ago, but is that in any way actually a significant indicator of anything? Taking the same kind of view from 2005 to 2014 what do you get? In 2005 we consumed 84,588,000 bbl/d. This grew to a peak of 86,788,000 bbl/d in 2007 before the crash. World consumption fell in 2008 and in 2009 bottomed out at 85,021,000 bbl/d. Then in 2010 the world set a new record consumption rate, and it has continued to do so every year right through 2014 when we consumed 91,253,000 bbl/d.
All numbers above from the EIA,
https://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/ ... &unit=TBPDNow you can bend and twist all you want, however these numbers are not in any sort of real dispute. Not only that but when the economic calamity of 1979 hit the USA it depressed world consumption for almost a decade, when the economic calamity with the USA and EU in 2008 it only pushed world consumption down for two short years. The dynamic has fundamentally changed whether I or you or anyone else likes it or not. The world today burns about 7 MILLION bbl/d more oil every day than we burned in 2005. That is reality. Until we not only burn less oil every year than the year before, but continue to burn less oil year after year for at least a decade will we have very strong evidence we have passed global peak oil. If we go into a 'greatest depression' that will suppress consumption for economic instead of geological reasons so to call peak you have to watch a whole slew of different factors all at the same time and make judgment calls on how much each factor is influencing things.