by Pops » Sun 26 Oct 2014, 16:08:07
I'd guess there is no set threshold, more a sliding scale. The lower the price, the less utility required to justify the cost - drive to the QuikSac for a bottle of water. In order to justify a higher price one must receive more utility per unit purchased, more bang for the buck, so a trip to the Sac might require purchasing a flat of waters instead.
I'd guess very cheap energy subsidizes the economy more than any of us can guess.
But as I've said for a while now, the price doesn't necessarily need to increase to some silly number for demand destruction to be evident - the economy could possibly shrink to meet the supply available. In fact if the economy shrinks faster than the supply falls, the price might even fall even as decline takes over.
--
The price of oil is "set at the margin" - in other words, it is an auction and the price paid for the very last barrel supplied is the price paid for every barrel sold at that particular time. If the demand is high price goes up and for a while anyway people are forced to pay - that means the demand is inflexible - people need to drive to work etc. But a little longer term, people make adjustments and drive less, trade vehicles, move closer etc. Again, the people who were wasting the most (receiving the least utility) are the first to cut back. Witness the US, the world champ QuikSac trippers.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)