In my little brain I need to break down the future to something like "events" and "conditions". So something that is relatively isolated in time and place is an event but something that is more long term and widespread is a condition. Events occur within conditions, maybe because of conditions, maybe for much smaller local reasons.
War is an event, most wars are local but even world wars were limited in duration. Likewise governments are more like events than conditions in that they are local and subject to rapid change. Ditto most of our social structures, The 1%ers so much discussed nowadays for example are vested in virtual wealth, which like BitCoins demonstrate, are not all that permanent.
On the other hand, growth is a condition: whether in economic terms, or in advancing technology or even population numbers. We've become used to growth, hard to believe but there were not that many smart phones 6 or 7 years ago, Google is less than 15 years old.
Really
the change in conditions that peak oil signals is a decrease in surpluses because of an increase in the cost of mechanical work - think "Energy Slave"
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('
Grist', 'H')ow much energy was available to the (free) population of the antebellum South? In 1860, the U.S. had just under 4 million slaves, working for about 8.5 million free residents of the south and border states, or 0.47 slaves/free southerner. . . . [details]
Taking southern society as a whole, the free population had (3.4 x 7 + 4)/8.5, or 3.27 "energy slaves" a piece.
Now consider the present day. The U.S. population is 311 million. We use 100 quadrillion Btus ("quads") of energy/year. Since a human requires 2,200 calories of food per day (1 food calorie = 3.97 Btus),
our current energy use amounts to 100 energy slaves per capita.
So the "general condition" we face is fewer virtual slaves. That means less work performed at the flick of a switch and more work either done by humans - which in reality means less work done. Less work done means less surplus, less wealth and a lower "standard of living."
I'm trying to come up with a way to look at the American south post-slavery and somehow leave out the racist parts we're still dealing with but I'm not sure that is possible. In the aftermath of the confederacy the former slaves were still available to do work but the economics of the slavery system were ruined because they began to take some of the profit for themselves that had previously gone to the masters making them and the entire south look richer than it was on a per-capita basis. Perhaps today's wage slaves who toil in the master's cubicles will be like the freedmen in the south.
I think it's pretty hard to predict events except to say we'll try any and everything to escape the reality of the changed condition.