by deconstructionist » Sun 27 Mar 2005, 22:28:24
and how about agriculture?? this article doesn't mention that it doesn't even matter that john's refridgerator has been reduced into a pile of metal because all of the food inside of it would be gone too...
yeah, way over the top i'd say. rising prices and decreasing production does not mean anything previously made from petrolium is going to dissapear. drawing that scenario makes this article totally useless because the scenario is alarmist bullshit. i would highly reccomend NOT showing this piece to anyone that you're trying to turn on to peak oil theory. a skeptic would dismiss this article as the unrealistic and irrelavant piece of drivel that it is. it draws light to some important information, but the delivery of this information makes it undigestable.
yes, it is important to realize the numerous ways in which our lives are dependant on petrolium products. but instead of painting the picture of it all "disappearing," why not just sort out and name of the things that would be impossible to have without cheap oil? then point out that we're consuming it faster than the world can produce it. then get into alternatives, EROEI, transportability, numerous uses, economics, etc...
UNLESS