I feel like I have to post it again: the letter from Sam Bodman to the NPC asking for the review. Yes, it includes the words "peak oil".
image
This is from the NPC report:
image
And then they had this interesting conference call with invited bloggers with the American Petroleum Institute on this report.
Mr. Nelson is from the big oil service company Schlumberger, Mr. Eizember is from ExxonMobil, Ms. van Ryan is the host and Ms. Tverberg is from the Oil drum.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '0')0:45:22 MR. NELSON: I do think - the way you phrased your question, you know, kind of made me nervous because what we - we made a distinction between conservation and efficiency. In our mind, efficiency is doing essentially the same thing with less energy. Conservation we deemed as doing without. We're not saying take cars off the road or drive fewer miles; we're saying make them more fuel efficient, make the overall fleet more fuel efficient.
00:46:00 MS. TVERBERG: Yeah, I guess the one thing that happens, though, is that if you really believe that we're reaching to peak oil now, then you start saying, oh, dear; maybe we do need to start looking at taking cars off the road or carpooling or doing something else that really is conservation as opposed to just making the cars more fuel efficient.
00:46:23 MS. VAN RYAN: Again, people are sitting here, Gail, kind of shaking their heads at one another because, again, it depends on what your assumptions are.
MS. TVERBERG: Right, right, exactly.
MR. EIZEMBER: I mean, your statement, if you really believe that we couldn't raise oil production any more than we are producing today -
MR. NELSON: Well, fuel -
MS. TVERBERG: Or not - it's not very much.
MR. EIZEMBER: Fuel production, liquid fuel production, or not very much, then most of the forecasts for economic activity and demand going forward are not going to be supportable in the way they stand.
MS. TVERBERG: Right. That is right.
No shit.