by Fergus » Sun 10 Sep 2006, 11:25:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', 'S')ame thing in the Athabasca oil sands of northern Alberta, but the worst thing there is skilled people shortages, more than equipment.
They needs people by the thousands, but there is insufficient support infrastructure in that remote area right now, housing, stores, other food services, roads, and medical care to enlarge the population by that amount. Its coming along, but not as fast as necessary to support the multi-billion dollar investments.
Well, if the oil was not in places it was so hazardous to work, I would sign up. But who wants to work in Iraq, Sudan, Durfer, Indonesia. Even with hazard pay, that just does not justify the threat to body, spirit and life. Thats a damn dangerous profession now adays. I work in the insurance industry. I can guarentee you if your an oil worker, work over seas ins 'hot spot' or do frequent travel to the mideast/fareast/africa, if you can even get insurance, its gunna cost you more then you really wanted to pay. Maybe more then you can afford to pay. I dont know for sure, but I am thinking the above professions are higer risk the Police/movie stunt industry (very highly rated professions).
The countries that hold the oil are to blame for this situation. They need to hold clear sway over the entire region the oil workers/execs/boats operate in. If you cant guarentee their safety, you cant guarentee anything, including delivery.
Noe canada should not have a problem, but generally speaking no one wants to work in the the oil industry, no one wants to put their rigs in danger zones. I cant blame em.