by americandream » Mon 29 Nov 2010, 02:32:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cid_Yama', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'S')o this is more a case of an imperial head seeking to use another imperial head with more firepower to see off a competitor.
No, it's Bush hiring out the US military as a mercenary force to do Saudi Arabia's bidding.
Bush 1 did it, Bush 2 did it. Nice to know what your children really died for, isn't it?
They died to pad the pockets of America's elites, while supporting Saudi hegemony in the Middle East.
Seeing as the House of Saud is a British invention, it's hard to work out who shouts first when it gets to this lot doing things. The Saudi nobs are, IMHO, dimwits, given the precarious nature of their kingdom (and empire) and the depth of wealth therein, in comparison to the West. So I'm inclined to view Arab notions of geo-political leverage with amusement. On the other hand, it serves Western interests to have a naive tactician heading up the Arab Empire.