Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE "War on Drugs" Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby yeahbut » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 15:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', 'N')ow you may wish to shoe-horn these and all other reasons for drug consumption into your two categories, but I don't know why. Such reductionism doesn't help to us to see the truth of the matter, IMO.


It totally does help us see the truth of the matter.

I submit that people take drugs for only three reasons:

1. For medical problems such as physical pain or psychosis.

2. To experience emotional happiness.

3. To experience altered intellectual functioning.

The only rational reason for taking drugs is reason number one.


You already submitted this postition Tommy. Restating it with the addition of the word "totally" doesn't make it any more true :razz:, or take the discussion forward.
Since you have said nothing new, I have nothing to add, except to point out the inherent absurdity of talking about "rational" reasons for drug-taking.
User avatar
yeahbut
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby careinke » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 16:16:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '2'). To experience emotional happiness.


I thought the pursuit of happiness was an inaliable right.

Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 16:38:06

Here's something fun, even if you aren't in an altered state:

Zoomquilt II

(It might take a minute to load...)
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 16:48:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '2'). To experience emotional happiness.


I thought the pursuit of happiness was an inaliable right.


Oh come on. That is such outmoded thinking. Maybe if you were living in the late 18th century sure, but not today. Get with The Program already... sheesh! :roll:

(Incidentally, it's unalienable...)
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 17:57:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', 'I') have nothing to add, except to point out the inherent absurdity of talking about "rational" reasons for drug-taking.


Taking drugs for rational reasons is not absurd.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby yeahbut » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 18:44:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', 'I') have nothing to add, except to point out the inherent absurdity of talking about "rational" reasons for drug-taking.


Taking drugs for rational reasons is not absurd.


Quite true Tommy, in the sense of taking aspirin for a headache, maybe even in the case of taking opiates for heavy labour as I think you mentioned earlier(a new one on me, I do a lot of heavy physical work, what do you recommend? :-D), I stand corrected. To be fair, tho, I was referring to the type of drug use that we have been discussing in this thread. That is to say, recreational drug use. Do you hold that this also is rational? Self-medicating or something along those lines? I'm not needling, genuinely interested in your perspective.
User avatar
yeahbut
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 21 Dec 2008, 19:24:51

MSNBC Piece On Stealth Cocaine Subs

Why doesn't the State just take over control, pricing and distribution of cocaine? The charter would be to make coke available to but to keep its broad use to a minimum.
Carlhole
 

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 04:19:51

Here's an angle on decriminalization that I don't recall having been mentioned in this thread yet (one a little more in keeping with the general tone of P.O.com) :

Give people complete, unrestricted access to whatever they choose (without excusing poor behavior under the influence of course).

If you think about it, the minority that can't control their urges likely tend to be Darwin Award candidates in numerous aspects of their lives anyway. Call them the top 10% (or bottom, depending on your perspective) if you like.

What more humane way could you possibly think of to cull the population than to let people pick their poison?
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby reuterrooter » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 04:51:41

So, let your child keep sniffing glue?

You think it will help society to have another retard who can't make change at a McDonalds and who needs anti-seizure mnedication daily so he doesn't fall in the street and get run over?

Anyone taking drugs put a great burden on society. Anyone positive on a drug screen should be jailed minimum 30 days, bread and water, and no television. second offense 60 days third offense chain gang one year at the gulag.
User avatar
reuterrooter
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun 21 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby reuterrooter » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 04:56:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/28257290#28257290]MSNBC Piece On Stealth Cocaine Subs[/url]

Why doesn't the State just take over control, pricing and distribution of cocaine? .



They already have. They are keeping it as high as possible.
Where do you think cocaine comes from?
You think the majority of cocaine comes through drug smuglers?

Drug legalization will never happen, it would drop the profits.
User avatar
reuterrooter
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun 21 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby yippleflipple » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 05:30:19

anyone know where i can score some acid?
User avatar
yippleflipple
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat 13 Sep 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 02:31:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('reuterrooter', 'S')o, let your child keep sniffing glue?

You think it will help society to have another retard who can't make change at a McDonalds and who needs anti-seizure mnedication daily so he doesn't fall in the street and get run over?


Do you let your kids play in traffic?

Accessibility only applies to legally responsible adults; of course you don't make them readily available to kids. (Altho' interestingly in countries with no minimum drinking age, adult alcoholism is almost non-existent.)

Anyway, 'sniffing' of glue, along with other volatiles, is popular among certain segments of the population precisely because they aren't illegal and can readily be acquired at any Lowe's, Home Depot or True Value. Not to mention the fact that 'huffing' is something entirely different than recreational drug use, being essentially chemical asphyxiation. So wtf does that have to do with any of this conversation?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nyone taking drugs put a great burden on society.


Yea, especially the legally prescribed ones. Seriously tho'... you're ignorance on this subject is made so apparent by this statement and the pronouncements following it that I won't even bother addressing it further...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby shakespear1 » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 04:00:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', '(Altho' interestingly in countries with no minimum drinking age, adult alcoholism is almost non-existent.) ')

One that comes to mind where I worked was Argentina. NO PROBLEM with kids and alcohol. I never saw drunk teenagers. Alcohol was available to them everywhere!!!!

People need to ask themselves why is this so. Once you understand this then the rest of this Drugs game will be clearer.
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby Roy » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 09:49:09

Likewise here in the states...

When I was a teen in So Cal, alcohol was very difficult to acquire due to stiff enforcement of age requirements, and stiff penalties for adults caught providing alcohol to minors. Our favorite method of obtaining it was to 'fish' for illegals in front of convenience stores. Who says high school Spanish wasn't useful...

Regarding illegal drugs, the situation was a bit different. I don't ever recall any supplier ever asking me for an ID to buy a bag of MJ. Nor do I recall ever having any difficulty obtaining it outside the normal black market snafus.

My contention is that legalizing it (soft drugs at a minimum) will make it harder, not easier, for young people to obtain. And it would put much of the drug crime business out of business.

I agree with TWilliam, and have been saying it for years, that legalized cocaine would end most of the addicts in 12 months or less. First of all the price would drop to the point where spare change could buy a fix *(not unlike alcohol... everyone has seen bums begging change for a bottle), and secondly, all cocaine addiction leads to either death, prison, or rehab.

Legalized cocaine loses its glamour. It loses the entrepreneurial appeal for poor youth. And it weeds out the weaker personalities quickly.

I don't beleive that if cocaine were legal that everyone on this board would run to the store, buy an ounce, and OD themselves.

People who like coke are already doing coke and know where to get it. Those of us who don't either don't want it or have tried it and don't like it that much.

It's complicated for sure. Clearly though, the prohibition isn't working.

And no, I would not allow my kids to sniff glue, legal or not. Just as I won't give them shots of everclear or lines of coke at their 8th birthday party either.

I will close my rambling post with this:


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience." --C.S. Lewis
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby vision-master » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 09:53:40

Taht Roger Waters bootleg DVD from Argentina sure was good last night. The second disk was a complete live "Dark Side of The Moon" concert. The visuals were really trippy. :razz:
vision-master
 

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 02:44:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', 'r')ecreational drug use. Do you hold that this also is rational? Self-medicating or something along those lines? I'm not needling, genuinely interested in your perspective.


In general principle, recreational use of illegal drugs is not rational because the legal risks of acquiring and using illegal drugs outweigh the benefits.

If all drugs were legal, recreational use could be rational, as is the case with alcohol at social gatherings.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 04:18:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'I')n general principle, recreational use of illegal drugs is not rational because the legal risks of acquiring and using illegal drugs outweigh the benefits.

I would disagree. Currently the estimated U.S. population is a little under 305.5 million, and the current number of individuals incarcerated in the U.S. for drug offenses is around 350,000 --a little more than one tenth of one percent-- which means one's chances of getting arrested for illegal drug use are about one in one thousand. Most people would consider those to be very acceptable odds when weighed against the perceived benefits of the drugs...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 11:53:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'w')hich means one's chances of getting arrested for illegal drug use are about one in one thousand.


The legal problems with illegal drug use extend out further than just people who are incarcerated. Your one-in-a-thousand does not include the millions and millions of people who:

  • got probation, but now have a drug conviction on their record
  • had to pay substantial fines, attorney fees, and court costs
  • failed a drug test and were fired, or didn't get a job
  • had their children taken away by a court because of drug use
  • didn't receive government benefits because of drug use
  • got excommunicated from their family support group because of the social stigma
  • had their money stolen by unscrupulous black-market dealers
  • lost their government license to earn a living because of drug use (RN, CPA, bus driver, MD, real estate broker, pilot, etc.)
Compare those costs to the benefits of recreational drug use. Normally you are 60% happy/fun. Every other weekend you recreate by taking illegal drugs to be 90% happy/fun for 8 hours.

When I run that cost/benefit analysis, the risks of illegal drug use just aren't worth the benefits.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 12:37:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'w')hich means one's chances of getting arrested for illegal drug use are about one in one thousand.


The legal problems with illegal drug use extend out further than just people who are incarcerated. Your one-in-a-thousand does not include the millions and millions of people who:

  • got probation, but now have a drug conviction on their record
  • had to pay substantial fines, attorney fees, and court costs
  • failed a drug test and were fired, or didn't get a job
  • had their children taken away by a court because of drug use
  • didn't receive government benefits because of drug use
  • got excommunicated from their family support group because of the social stigma
  • had their money stolen by unscrupulous black-market dealers
  • lost their government license to earn a living because of drug use (RN, CPA, bus driver, MD, real estate broker, pilot, etc.)
Compare those costs to the benefits of recreational drug use. Normally you are 60% happy/fun. Every other weekend you recreate by taking illegal drugs to be 90% happy/fun for 8 hours.

When I run that cost/benefit analysis, the risks of illegal drug use just aren't worth the benefits.


Mind Your Own Business
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby ninonat » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 15:36:47

Drug use is not fun, it destroys your abilities ever so slightly.
Taking drugs is admitting you don't like yourself, so the solution is not to escape from yourself but to change yourself.

Wanting to take drugs proves a need that something needs changing, when you like yourself you won't want to take drugs.

When tempted to take drugs, instead, change your mind and spend the time helping someone that could use help, help your wife clean the kitchen help your parents clean the garage.

Everytime you think about drugs, call up someone you havn't seen or you know needs help and ask them how you can help them.

The next day you will feel much better after you helped someone than waking up with a hangover, and you will have self respect instead of hating yourself that much more.

Today is the first day of the rest of your life.

If you saw a bum sitting in a corner saying "I'm no good, I'm no good" you would lift him up and say yes you are good, c'mon I have a job for you to do. I need my yeard mowed, my yard shoveled of snow. If he doesn't want to work or help thentell him he has life strength and he can help someone, everyone can help someone this is what destroys low self esteem, when you get a thank you from the heart.

Anyone can volunteer to clean toilets, walk into any 7-eleven and tell them you are homeless and you want to work and you are a toilet cleaning service and you will clean their toilets three times a day for a dollar.

they will hire you instantly.
User avatar
ninonat
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu 25 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron