Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE US Marines Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: GR Marines forced out of Toledo

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 19:56:51

Toledo is screwed if TS ever does HTF. They'll be overrun by zombies from Detroit within days.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: GR Marines forced out of Toledo

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 20:20:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')oledo is screwed if TS ever does HTF. They'll be overrun by zombies from Detroit within days.


Thanx for the vote of confidence SPG, I am 45 miles south of Detroit and 15 miles north of Toledo with the lake to my east.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: GR Marines forced out of Toledo

Unread postby Bas » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 20:37:59

Shouldn't this thread be about berkeley?
Bas
 

Re: GR Marines forced out of Toledo

Unread postby killJOY » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 20:47:32

Ah, my old hometown makes the news again. It is always, always something negative--neo-nazi rallies,political corruption scandals, bizarre murders--now this.

There is something fitting about Toledo's "bombed-out shell" of a down town that makes it suitable for urban military drills.

Here's a view nearby the neighborhood I grew up in:

Image

Charming place.

That's why I fled ^NNE^
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: GR Marines forced out of Toledo

Unread postby killJOY » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 20:57:53

BTW:
that refinery (this one)

Image

is where the tar sands go for refining.


"Watch out where the tar sands flow,
And don't you eat that ashy snow..."
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Marine rap

Unread postby Ayoob » Wed 21 May 2008, 05:40:56

User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop leak

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 11 Jun 2010, 15:28:43

Once again peakoil.com is AHEAD of the curve. WEEKS AGO people here were proposing the use of nukes or other explosives to seal the leaking well.

Now, an influential scientist who works for the Marines is proposing using the largest available non-nuclear explosive bomb to seal the leaking well----his proposal in gaining attention in DC.

marine corps scientist says a very big bomb can seal the leaking well

Its time to stop the leak. I say blow it to hell.

Image
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 11 Jun 2010, 16:08:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')nce again peakoil.com is AHEAD of the curve. WEEKS AGO people here were proposing the use of nukes or other explosives to seal the leaking well.

Now, an influential scientist who works for the Marines is proposing using the largest available non-nuclear explosive bomb to seal the leaking well----his proposal in gaining attention in DC.

marine corps scientist says a very big bomb can seal the leaking well

Its time to stop the leak. I say blow it to hell.

Winston Churchill have said:

"After attempting all possible alternatives Americans will eventually try at the end the most obvious, working solution".
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 11 Jun 2010, 17:03:27

Now BP admits the well is leaking out the side....oil is coming out of the seafloor.

If the well is leaking out the side, then thats just another good reason to seal it up with a bomb. BP's efforts to catch the oil aren't working and will never work.

Its time to plug the leak with a bomb.

Image
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Duende » Fri 11 Jun 2010, 17:20:47

That would be one of the bigger "hold your breath moments" I could imagine.
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 11 Jun 2010, 17:34:25

It would be incredible.

The whole world would watch the show to see if the USA us still a country that can do things and solve problems.

Whats going on now is just pathetic....every five days another EXXON VALDEX dribbles out from the sea floor and the government does nothing.

The bomb doesn't have to be nuclear...just big.

Its time to blow this thing to hell!!!!!!!!!

Image
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 14 Jun 2010, 16:44:25

Link to Franz Gayl's powerpoint showing how a large explosion using conventional weapons would collapse the well and stop the leak

link to ppt slides about method to stop oil leak

The link is given near the end of the chatty discussion about this solution to the oil spill problem in the GOM.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Cog » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 01:52:19

I've never understood the fascination with using bombs to stop leaking oil wells. There are proven ways to do it and have been used for decades. They are called relief wells. If you don't understand how they work, go over to The Oil Drum and they will explain it to you.

Using explosives, whether nuclear or non-nuclear, would only make a bad situation a lot worse.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 02:26:51

I've read the discussions of relief wells at "theoildrum" and they are quite interesting. Did you see the statistical analysis of how many RW will probably be needed to seal the leak?...I'll give you a hint---it will probably take more then one.

However, even by the time the first RW is drilled, the leak will pump another 10 or so Exxon Valdez loads of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. Wouldn't it make sense to use an explosive charge to collapse the well bore and stop the flow now instead of waiting months and dithering and doing nothing while huge additional amounts of oil unnecessarily pollute the Gulf?

Image
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Cog » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 06:05:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')'ve read the discussions of relief wells at "theoildrum" and they are quite interesting. Did you see the statistical analysis of how many RW will probably be needed to seal the leak?...I'll give you a hint---it will probably take more then one.

However, even by the time the first RW is drilled, the leak will pump another 10 or so Exxon Valdez loads of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. Wouldn't it make sense to use an explosive charge to collapse the well bore and stop the flow now instead of waiting months and dithering and doing nothing while huge additional amounts of oil unnecessarily pollute the Gulf?

Image


No it doesn't make sense as long as there is an intact BOP and wellhead. BP is capturing a good amount of oil, 15k bpd, and is preparing to capture more. Blowing up the wellhead doesn't accomplish anything except to put more oil in the Gulf.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 08:10:18

I think it's ill-advised at this juncture (as my favorite Bush would say).

Capturing as much oil as possible until the relief wells are at least tried seems to me to have the best risk/reward calculus at the moment. By the end of the week they will have about 30,000 bpd collection capacity and more is coming. Even if the relief wells can't be successful for some reason, it will then be a tradeoff of sucking the field dry as fast as possible by production wells or risk the special delivery of a bomb.

From what I have read, the risk of a bomb is that it would fracture the well and formation in unintended ways, allowing the seepage of hydrocarbons up to the seabed at multiple points making it impossible to contain or stop any of it. Although I guess they could then try an even bigger bomb and see what happens.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 09:17:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think it's ill-advised at this juncture (as my favorite Bush would say).

Capturing as much oil as possible until the relief wells are at least tried seems to me to have the best risk/reward calculus at the moment. By the end of the week they will have about 30,000 bpd collection capacity and more is coming. Even if the relief wells can't be successful for some reason, it will then be a tradeoff of sucking the field dry as fast as possible by production wells or risk the special delivery of a bomb.

From what I have read, the risk of a bomb is that it would fracture the well and formation in unintended ways, allowing the seepage of hydrocarbons up to the seabed at multiple points making it impossible to contain or stop any of it. Although I guess they could then try an even bigger bomb and see what happens.


Your Worst Case Scenario is already happening.
The Hydro's are coming out the casing below the sea bed.
The oil/gas can't come out any faster.
BP/US are doing EVERYTHING WRONG now.
The riser was 2 in thickness. Now est is 1 in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpPNQoTl ... r_embedded

"When it gets 'drastic, we'll
'implode the well'.=Hofmeister. What does he mean? :badgrin:

71% (USAToday)thinks Obama's way wrong.
And also the damage will last a decade.
While Obama says 'Normal before you know it.'
While NO ONE anywhere in the Main Media has
said more than 'Summer, a few years.'

And that's the thing about Dragon Kings.
They expose your lies/obfuscations/criminal
behavior in Real Time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpPNQoTl ... r_embedded

Video on exactly how to nuke the well.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 09:37:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', 'B')P/US are doing EVERYTHING WRONG now.


Have you ever considered running for public office, mcgowanjm ? You seem to have many ideas and courage of conviction. You could get in there and make a difference. I've been asked to run for local office, but for me, it's about the toughest job I can imagine and I just am too selfish.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby Maddog78 » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 10:47:34

To implode the well you have to get the charge deep enough into solid rock. Blowing off the top layer of soft clays will just make it worse.

Two options;
1)You have to run it into the current well on pipe. Tricky running a charge into a well flowing at that rate.
You'd have to get some type of rig on surface to run it on either coil tubing or drill pipe.
That also adds danger.

2) Drill a well beside the current well. The two relief wells drilling now would not be acceptable to do the job.
The trajectory I have seen of them shows them coming in at an angle to intersect near the bottom of the current well. They would have to start another one to get the correct angle to intersect near the top of the "hard" rock.
I have not seen any data to know where this is. This is the method they could take though, I believe.
Nuclear is not required. A normal large shaped charge could or should work.

Btw I'll say, I'm by no means an expert on blowing in wells but this is just what I think the options are based on my general industry experience. I haven't seen many bloggers with any experience at all, this nuke it now talk comes with no practical suggestions on how or where to deliver this nuke, I've noticed.
Just firing one into the seabed from a submarine as some have mentioned, would not work at all and would just make it much, much worse. The whole field could unload and flood the GOM with radioactive oil.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Marine Corps Scientist proposes using big bomb to stop l

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:08:44

^
^
L__Yes, of course.

Exactly what I've wanted from Day 3 (at least).

We should have ALL kinds of drilling going on now
in the Macondo Field.

And a BTW, when the 'experts' make the situation
worse, you eventually, or sooner, get rid of the 'experts'.
We've been over this before. 8)

Two Reliefs.
Two strait into the Field.
And One for placing an explosive to 'implode the well'.

12:06 p.m. | Updated Robert Bea at the University of California, Berkeley, noted some earlier uses of explosives to stop sub-sea blowouts:

Luckily I have worked as a roughneck on several drill rigs and worked on some very large blowouts and spills (Bay Marchand, Mississippi, H2S well [large pdf], Santa Barbara, Piper Alpha, Petrobras P36) so I have some idea about what happened and is happening.

Yes, explosives have been used to stop blowouts. To my knowledge, the Russians did this first. A shallow well is drilled to intersect the blowout well. Explosives are set in the bottom of the well next to the casing of the blowout well. The explosion collapses and seals the well. When I worked for Shell, we almost used this technique to stop the Mississippi H2S well blowout. This well produced one thirds of the U.S. production of H2S per day. Three cities had to be evacuated.

1:48 p.m. | Updated The Harvard physicist Richard Wilson just emailed this note about an approach that capped a seabed well in 40 days:

The problem is finding a 5-inch diameter pipe at the bottom of the seabed or below. One can get within 100 feet by dead reckoning. The method successfully used (in fixing the offshore well that caught fire off Brazil 10 years or so ago) was devised by a former student of mine, Dr. Arthur Kuckes. His company in Ithaca, N.Y., is “ Vectormagnetics.”

(1) Drill a relief well as close as you can. Put Arthur’s gadget down the pipe and send 20 amps of DC (possibly pulsed to code it) to run back to ground.

(3) If the soil is uniform, there will be no longitudinal magnetic field in his device.

(4) If there is an iron pipe nearby current will run to the iron pipe and change the magnetic field.

(5) From this Artur deduces where the old oil well is, and pulls his equipment out and tells the relief well people how to adjust their drilling.

(6) After perhaps 3 or 4 attempts, getting closer every time, the drill hits the old well and recovery commences. Brazil took 40 days.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron