Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Stephen Hawking Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Stephen Hawking Seeks Answers on Humanity's Future

Unread postby Jack » Sat 08 Jul 2006, 23:27:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'I')n that view every person is as valuable as the next. Nobody deserves to survive any more than their neighbor or their enemy does.


Really? Let us suppose you have a close friend. The close friend and a stranger each need your help - but you can only help one.

You can try to help both, and fail. Why, then, should anyone care to be your friend?

You can help the stranger, and ignore your friend. Why, then, should anyone care to be your friend?

You can help your friend, and ignore the stranger. You will have abandoned the ideal you set forth.

Which will you choose? 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Stephen Hawking Seeks Answers on Humanity's Future

Unread postby emailking » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:44:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'I')n that view every person is as valuable as the next. Nobody deserves to survive any more than their neighbor or their enemy does.


Really? Let us suppose you have a close friend. The close friend and a stranger each need your help - but you can only help one.

You can try to help both, and fail. Why, then, should anyone care to be your friend?

You can help the stranger, and ignore your friend. Why, then, should anyone care to be your friend?

You can help your friend, and ignore the stranger. You will have abandoned the ideal you set forth.

Which will you choose? 8)


Jack is very cold hearted when it comes to this stuff. He cares about helping himself and "two or three" other clan members, and wouldn't even spare a penny to help a homeless kid on the street.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Stephen Hawking Seeks Answers on Humanity's Future

Unread postby Dukat_Reloaded » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 08:29:57

Jack has a point and it does relate to survial. Jacks thinking is a survial trait, and that trait will pass down though the generations. People who do not have that trait will not survive. It's like if everyone piles into an elevator and the elevator light flashes "maximum load exceeded", everyone will eye the fattest person and kick them off.
User avatar
Dukat_Reloaded
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Stephen Hawking Seeks Answers on Humanity's Future

Unread postby Chaparral » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 12:55:49

Jack is a wise man. I cannot help but wonder if he was one of my classmates back at the University of Hard Knocks.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

THE Stephen Hawking Thread (merged)

Unread postby virgincrude » Sat 02 Sep 2006, 13:16:56

Did I miss any posts on this? This guy is revered in science, people treat him like some new age God, people flocked to answer his question on yahoo. and expected him to come up with the definitive answer (42 for those of us who read The HitchHiker's Guide ...) Do you think someone should tell him about PO? I mean, how does he expect us to go off and colonise space with oil depletion in full swing ...?

Just disappointing when one of the world's leading science guru's turns out to be ignorant. Answer's pretty simple IMHO, Peak Oil will deplete the human race to the new race of survivors who will finally live with peace as a FULL TIME state, (as opposed to the part time sate of peace currently) and only this way shall there be any survivors of the Last man STanding game currently being played out ...

(All answers on a post card please....)
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sat 02 Sep 2006, 13:37:37

Hopefully the Earth isn't too close to becoming a Black Hole, otherwise we'd all get sucked below the Event Horizon and disappear forever! You don't really worry about this do you Raph? Virgincrude, you know, the survivors may be warlike too. Ever think of that? They'll be the Jacks of the world, making everybody into slaves is one way it might play out. jess sayin'... "Please Mister Jack, lemme work on your farm, can I sleep in the barn? feed me, I'm hungry"
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sat 02 Sep 2006, 15:28:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '
')Me worry?
When you see a bigger picture PMS, you do not get lost in the detail, you do not fret the small stuff.
It will all make for a good book on esoteric connectivity perhaps.
If Von Danikan can get away with his fiction...some of my fact should penetrate.
"Esoteric connectivity", yes, I like that, it describes your approach very well. Are you writing a book, Raph? Hansel and Gretel>bread crumbs>crumbling cities>hurricane Katrina. You can use that if you like. :) So how about telling us about Peru and Machu Picchu. I would really like to hear about it.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 02 Sep 2006, 16:14:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', 'I')f the formula for Entropy accumulation is 25% of the circumscribed area of the event horizon of a Black Hole (a closed system) what exactly defines the Earth’s circumscribed area, and how close are we to 25%?


Apart from the fact that the Earth is not a star, hence will not collapse into a black hole, the US does have a black hole, it's called the Defense Department's spending.

This piechart put's it at 30% for current military spending...Where your income tax really goes
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby peaker_2005 » Sun 03 Sep 2006, 10:41:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', 'I')f the formula for Entropy accumulation is 25% of the circumscribed area of the event horizon of a Black Hole (a closed system) what exactly defines the Earth’s circumscribed area, and how close are we to 25%?


Apart from the fact that the Earth is not a star, hence will not collapse into a black hole, the US does have a black hole, it's called the Defense Department's spending.

This piechart put's it at 30% for current military spending...Where your income tax really goes


:lol:
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
peaker_2005
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby virgincrude » Sun 03 Sep 2006, 12:38:17

PenultimateManStanding, obviously, if all we're left with after die down or die off, whatever you wanna call it, are Americans or Africans, then yes, you'll just keep on killing each other until ... what?

I keep sane by thinking that somewhere during the killing, bombing, maiming, and other such human activities the survivors will realise that if they keep going they will simply wipe each other out, and that's a no-win situation. There will be survivors, and they will see how futile perpetual war is.

Unless they wipe out all the women first ...
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby lowem » Sun 03 Sep 2006, 12:52:06

The chosen answer basically said, "have faith". The fellow who asked the question probably already believes that technology will save us, that we will colonise space, that we will have a Star Trek future.

How about we put that together :
"Have faith, we will have a Star Trek future."

:lol:

25,396 responses, and the chosen answer says to have faith. I find that rather incredible. I am also vaguely disappointed. "Having faith" is what our priests, our politicians, our economists, and our fund managers have always been telling us. Right ...

I'm a contrarian. I suspect that quite a number of us here are contrarians. Because, somehow, we don't believe in the majority view :lol:
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore

Re: Stephen Hawking's Answer

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 03 Sep 2006, 13:01:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('virgincrude', ' ')yes, you'll just keep on killing each other until ... what?
Until Jack is the Lord Of The Earth. I hope to be an advisor or minister or something like that. How about it, Jack?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Hawking - Black Holes and Entropy

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 24 Oct 2006, 09:50:57

count your blessings, it could have been like the physicist forum where they said WTF! get rid of this freak! or the Theologian forum where they wouldn't talk to you and waited patiently for you to go away. At least here people will respond. that's something, even if they respond by posting a picture of a fruitcake. note that it wasn't me that posted the fruitcake, I think your ideas are eccentric, and I suggested before that you stick to mythology and symbols, but that was only a suggestion. Take it for what its worth to you.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Hawking - Black Holes and Entropy

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 24 Oct 2006, 10:15:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', 'N')ow if laws of physics on earth hold true in space, would laws of physics in space hold true on earth.
In other words, if the earth is a closed system, how does the formula for the accumulation of entropy effect the earth?


Since the earth is a closed system, Entropy is not bound to increase. Only isolated systems are so restricted.

The 2nd law of thermo be:
"The total entropy of any isolated thermodynamic system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value."

A closed system can have external energy applied to it to reduce its net entropy.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Hawking - Black Holes and Entropy

Unread postby basil_hayden » Tue 24 Oct 2006, 13:04:08

Raphael -

as far as I can tell from looking at the equations presented on Hawkings website, and being about as familiar with this subject as you appear to be about chemistry, it appears that the 25% max entropy in a black hole system is due in part to geometry - the tubular aspect of the black hole and the outward expansion of the apparent horizon, from the perspective of the particle that remains outside the black hole.

Of course, since we apparently don't know what happened to the anti-particle sucked into the black hole, maybe that particle is dissipated energy (entropy) reformed and put to use (adding mass to add grav forces to make it larger or providing energy for Hawking Radiation to make the hole smaller).

The formula for entropy collection does not appear to be applicable to Earth as a system as it doesn't "collect" like a black hole does; there's no local foliated space I'm aware of.

Ozone holes dissipating is a function of physical chemistry, not gravitational entropy, whether it be due to GHGs or cosmic rays.

If God=energy, and satan=heat, and light=jesus, and light=energy and heat=energy, then by your set of equations, God=Satan, which may explain much on this planet! fits my view that it's just two sides of the same coin, and we judge what we see based on where we are. My trash is your treasure so to speak.

Other than that, you'll need to email Hawking directly from his website. Maybe he can straighten this out for you better. Other than that, it's been a pleasure being your research scientist.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA

Re: Is Steve Hawking Right or Wrong?

Unread postby entropyfails » Tue 24 Oct 2006, 13:58:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '
')I am still waiting for a response to a question I posed on the preceeding thread.

People do not seem to make the profound connection for what the formula for Entropy collection of a 'closed system' implies here on Earth.

If the maximum Entropy allowable is 25% of the 'circumscribed area', thus marking an event, the Black Hole dissipates.

Here on Earth, I will suggest we have breeched the 25% barrier, we have achieved 'maximum Entropy' and the ozone holes 'dissipating' are evidence of the breech.

Raphael, I'll answer your question.

No. *grin*

Sorry, this analogy is poor... What Hawking means when he talks about "maximum entropy" is a system so completely random that we cannot predict anything about it at all. We cannot really specify a particle in it nor can we tell in which direction it would inside of that "even horizon." Read up on the "no hair theorem" to gain greater understanding of what maximum entropy really means. You should also delve way deeper into the Weak Holographic Principle. The point being, we are talking about conditions of COMPLETE UNKNOWABLENESS. That you can recognize anything in your daily life at all proves we are far from this point.

Anyway, to understand this 25% number, try to apply the math rigorously. Here is an abridged formula for a stationary black hole.

Mass = ( surface_gravity / 8 pi ) * Area

And we have the Hawking radiation temperature formula of

Temp_of_BlackHole = (Surface_gravity / 2 pi)

So now you are a hop, skip and a jump away, and 10,000 hours of very hard mental math work from the entropy of a black hole.

A / 4

So relating this to Earth and Jesus? Perhaps metaphorically. I don't really see it. Any connections you find there will be similar to connections between Black Holes and the Greek Gods.

The really weird part about this is that the maximum information capacity of something in the universe is related to its area and not its volume. I mean it doesn't take much mental work to relate everything to Jesus. But just try to really understand what that statement means geometrically and you'll find something very weird and yet completely true!
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron