Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Native Americans Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Would the Native Americans have screwed up as royally?

Yes
16
No votes
No
18
No votes
America wasn't screwed up
4
No votes
 
Total votes : 38

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 14:38:12

Years ago, I lived in Scottsdale AZ just a hop skip and a jump west of the reservation. I wandered around the Res for a bit one day, driving around .... it was weird, yes it did look like a 3rd world country. The land was beautiful - green and productive, amazing in yuppie-sterile Scottsdale. But the buildings did look like they were built "bit by piece" and there was a real atmosphere of sadness...

Whites in the area were always complaining, Indians this and Indians that, where I think the biggest crime-committers were crazy druggie whites.

the Indians tried and tried to turn their backs on the white way of life and rather than being left alone the whites kept squeezing them harder and harder - there was a conscious program to eliminate the buffalo entirely for instance. Can't live off the buffalo if there are no buffalo.

The Navajo were pursued, their farms and fruit trees burned, then put on a long march and all possible done to kill them off. The last round of that was the gradual elimination of navajo sheep, to where there are not many left. Too many sheep on the land was the excuse, but somehow too many cattle scorching the hills are never a problem.

Apache kids in Scottsdale are occasionally seen asking for spare change on the sidewalk. They look like they need it.

And the saddest thing about it all is we whites lived the way the Indians did, thousands of years ago. It is not natural for us to work 40 hours a week for some corporation and eat factory food and all this modern white culture stuff either.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Byron100 » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 18:03:08

Yes, I'm saddened and ashamed with how the Natives have been treated by the white colonialists over the past 400 years. If there really was a just and sane God out there, He would have caused the Europeans to contract a series of deadly illnesses once they came to North America, ending the colonial era even before it started (not to mention putting the mother countries back in the Dark Ages once more...hehe. :twisted: )

There is no escaping the fact that the Natives were here *first*, and that we committed terrible crimes against our fellow human beings, even to this day. :(

I fully support the efforts of the Natives to declare independence from the United States and become a free and independent nation, and I wish them Godspeed in their much-belated struggle for freedom.

Hats off to the new Lakota Nation :)
Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide...
...and the meek shall inherit the Earth!
User avatar
Byron100
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu 08 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby 128shot » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 18:11:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kabu', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', '
')I'd like to know, if the governments did a P&L statment with the Indian bands what it would show. Put taxes collected on the left side, and, on the right hand side, money paid toward Indians for all kinds of services, most of which did not exist at the time of their treaties being signed. I'd love to know the "net".

You think an accountant could ever be the judge of how good our countries have been for them? With a fucking P&L statement tallying up every "modern" service rendered?

That wouldn't even give you a glimpse of the whole story. It wouldn't in any way account for all the social and environmental equity these groups have lost. If you asked everyone with even a shred of history in their heads whether or not these guys are at all better off since these treaties were made, the answer would be a resounding "no!" Of course, before most of those treaties were made they'd after they'd already been fucked over, and over and over...

I hope they follow through with this and that they're soon able to take back a small part of their dignity within their own nation (I'm not sure how badly this group's culture has been colonized).

Don't worry, if the government stops subsidizing the Lakota's rotted way of life, they'll just start propping up some other malinvestment for you to make a fuss over (if you catch on).

EDIT: never mind, for you it would be one of the ones our government subsidizes


Nope. Screw the white man. If you're Latino, Black, Indian, or any other minority except Asian you're basically entitled to receiving aid is what you're saying.

You know, my ancestors in Europe were starved to death in Ireland by the British (I'm scotish to, so I should have even more hatred for the british by your textbook), yet, no one person in Ireland is asking the UK to setup little independent countries where they can harbor their own laws in their own little nations yet still have the same rights and citizenship as someone born faithfully into the United Kingdom-while receiving government subsidization to boot!

Where are my entitlements? seriously, what happened to equality? That means NOT treating minorities differently than the majority, same goes for the reverse. you know, thats what true equality means.
User avatar
128shot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed 18 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby nutmeg » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 18:24:15

I'm a new poster here, and I admit that I am pro-white, but I support the Lakota Sioux in seceding from the evil Bush regime.

Anyone that secedes from a government that is committing a Holocaust in the Middle East, specifically in Iraq, gets my endorsement.

I don't believe in holding people who are alive today to be guilty of what white settlers did to the Indians, but I do think that the Iraq war is similiar to what the white settlers did to settle the US -- basically armed robbery.

I do not apologize for General Custer, or Columbus, or any other such murderers of Native Americans, but right now in 2007 I support Native American secession on the grounds that the Iraq War proves that the US government has NO LEGITIMACY WHATSOEVER.

And to all White people I say -- if you want to be absolved of all White guilt for shit that happened hundreds of years ago, now is your chance. Oppose the Iraq war and support Native American secession.
User avatar
nutmeg
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby kabu » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 18:48:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('128shot', '
')Nope. Screw the white man. If you're Latino, Black, Indian, or any other minority except Asian you're basically entitled to receiving aid is what you're saying.

I never said that. Go argue with yourself in the corner, dumb shit.
User avatar
kabu
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 18:57:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nutmeg', 'I')'m a new poster here, and I admit that I am pro-white, but I support the Lakota Sioux in seceding from the evil Bush regime.

Anyone that secedes from a government that is committing a Holocaust in the Middle East, specifically in Iraq, gets my endorsement.

I don't believe in holding people who are alive today to be guilty of what white settlers did to the Indians, but I do think that the Iraq war is similiar to what the white settlers did to settle the US -- basically armed robbery.

I do not apologize for General Custer, or Columbus, or any other such murderers of Native Americans, but right now in 2007 I support Native American secession on the grounds that the Iraq War proves that the US government has NO LEGITIMACY WHATSOEVER.

And to all White people I say -- if you want to be absolved of all White guilt for shit that happened hundreds of years ago, now is your chance. Oppose the Iraq war and support Native American secession.


Right On! 8)
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Loki » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 20:14:25

I say again, this is just a few grandstanding activists making a fuss. Russell Means does not speak for the Lakota Nation, never has. Despite what some gullible, ignorant reporters write, the Lakota Nation still stands by the treaties they made with the US. There has been no breaking away from the United States.

I tire very easily of the "whitey is the root of all evil" argument, but it is pretty clear that the Native peoples of North America were royally screwed by Europeans and their descendants. That said, there is plenty of blame to go around for their current troubles. Like blacks, Indians have legitimate gripes about how whites treated them in the past, but they magnify these problems with their various sundry social pathologies (alcoholism, lifestyle-induced diabetes, rampant crime, etc.). I don't say that in a gloating way or to "blame the victim." It sucks for everyone involved, white, black, red, etc.

Some tribes have managed to do OK for themselves, though, and not just with casinos. I think good leadership is probably the most important ingredient.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Pixie » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 21:17:57

What I am not clear on here is: is this action being taken by the tribal council, or a bunch of activists? Because if it is the latter, it is just a publicity stunt and means squat. If it is the former, then it's much more interesting. Likely result: Lakota Indians lose their tribal recognition, all their land, their autonomy, and any assistance they have gotten from the US Government. I recognize their point: treaties broken, many, many of them. Doesn't mean they've got nothing to lose.
Just another tofu-munching bike-riding Rambo(/Rambette)
User avatar
Pixie
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Pixie » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 21:23:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nutmeg', 'I')'
And to all White people I say -- if you want to be absolved of all White guilt for shit that happened hundreds of years ago, now is your chance. Oppose the Iraq war and support Native American secession.


Many people assume that minorities are no longer getting screwed. Not the case. When native americans talk about broken treaties, in a lot of cases, they are talking about stuff that happened last month.

That having been said, I agree with the statement quoted above.
Just another tofu-munching bike-riding Rambo(/Rambette)
User avatar
Pixie
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby SpringCreekFarm » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 21:25:51

I don't think that white race should feel guilty for what was done by their race in the past.

We have all (all sides ) grown immensely since then and only through honouring existing treaties and aggreements and negotiating new agreements can this be settled once and for all.

There are splinter groups in our area that take on the system and don't get anywhere because they don't get the support of the people. They have honourable intentions but I'm not sure there is a way of making sovereignty work.

I don't think we Natives can be sovereign at this point. There is nothing to be sovereign with. The system that was handed to us has worked for the government. It has put us in a state of dependence.

Not all reservations are the same. There is a big difference between a reservation surrounded by a lot of urban development, like the one I live on, and one that is located further north or in some other more remote area. There are some truly horrifying living conditions...

and for 128shot...the addictions and social problems cut a lot deeper than what you think. They are mired in it and you over simplifiy it.

The traditional way of subsistence living is also influenced by location. The further north you go, the more the people live off the land. If the government stopped our funding tommorrow, it would be the Olduvai Gorge for alot of reserves.

A group, nation whatever claiming sovereignty that cannot feed itself is not sovereign, in my opinon. Forget who's fault it is, it just isn't happening.

I'm sorry if I offended anyone with my post earlier, I didn't mean to be so hostile but there is an underlying anger that erupts when people speak ignorantly of others, not just Natives. It's sort of like the reaction you get from AAmericans when you use that word they don't like, and I don't like either.

For the record, in Canada we natives pay alot of taxes and do carry our own weight. We just have different tax CREDITS than others. I don't think there is a Canadian that pays ALL taxes but every native in Canada pays SOME taxes. Well maybe someday someone WILL sit down and figure out, including all the outstanding land claim and resource claims, the balance of who owes who what. That would be an interesting assessment.

A huge portion of the money that goes through the Indian Affairs in Canada goes toward funding a big fat bureaucratic system that skims a significant portion off the top. Trust me we aren't getting rich out here.

One thing that sucks about living on a reserve in Canada is the way the Indian Act, a legallity that Indians in Canada are governed under, limits us and treats us like children. If you can get a copy of it, read it. You'll chuckle at how my land tenant has to pay the government any rent money and then they pay it to the indian. ( Minus a cut, probably. ) That extreme example is not actually practiced, but the wording in the law is there.

Another thing that sucks is that I can only sell to people from my own band, or tribe, what have you. That's 1400 people in the entire world that are eligible to own my land. That means property out here sells for peanuts. Now, I'm not worried about that too much because I'm soooo happy to be here it's not funny but it would be nice if we could sell land to any native person in north america and buy land on other reservations just the same. We are locked into these little parcels called Indian Reserves as far as our own personal territory is concerened. This doesn't limit us in that we can purchase land away from the reservation, becase we can, but it just stinks that the government has such a grip on things that people off the reservation have no idea of.

gotta go.....
SpringCreekFarm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri 03 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 22:08:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'I') don't think that white race should feel guilty for what was done by their race in the past.

A group, nation whatever claiming sovereignty that cannot feed itself is not sovereign, in my opinon. Forget who's fault it is, it just isn't happening.

there is an underlying anger that erupts when people speak ignorantly of others, not just Natives. It's sort of like the reaction you get from AAmericans when you use that word they don't like, and I don't like either.


Tons of good points. I sure ran into a lot of Indian-haters in Arizona, but wow, talking to Canucks on the 'net, there's a ton of hatin' on the Indians up there too. And it does not make sense, in both cases it's people who live like shit right now and are barred from doing the most simple things to better themselves or live under the old ways.

And let us never forget, Civilization is a monster that's only eaten the Indians most recently, it ate us white folks and turned us into its tools a few thousand years ago.

We'd all be happier in buckskins and feathers and hunting/working a few hours a day if we could get away with it!

that's the real fight.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby TheDude » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 22:23:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'A') group, nation whatever claiming sovereignty that cannot feed itself is not sovereign, in my opinon. Forget who's fault it is, it just isn't happening.


Take away the oil and there you have the OCED. I'm not thirsting for a total collapse like some; it would likely outdo any calamity of the past for pure desperation and bloodshed.

An aside: Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a very interesting alternate history novel, The Years of Rice and Salt, set in a world where the Black Plague was immensely more virulent in Europe, wiping out 95% of the population, thus leaving the rest of the world to develop without interference. North America becomes divided between Chinese and Japanese settlers on the West Coast, and the Nations of the Hodenausee in the East, for instance.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Gigashadow » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 22:46:11

So, what programmes do the Indians have in place to help the people (including decimated tribes) *they* previously conquered. Or is paying up only for whitey?
User avatar
Gigashadow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby 128shot » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 00:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kabu', '
')I never said that. Go argue with yourself in the corner, dumb shit.


Wow, instead of making a counter point, this is so much easier huh?

Really, what your post seems to jumble into essentially that, though. you're arguing that because of what we did we somehow "owe" them now.


So why doesn't the UK cut me a check?
User avatar
128shot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed 18 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby 128shot » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 00:52:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', '
')


and for 128shot...the addictions and social problems cut a lot deeper than what you think. They are mired in it and you over simplifiy it.



Ya, and the Irish were treated like shit in their homeland and when they came over on boats...took until really the mid 20th century to see the fortune reverse.

When do you just say "look, lets all just start clean" and stop basing all this on what other races did to each and just treat each other as human beings. No more "white black latino asian" we're just..human.

Then and only then will things be right.
User avatar
128shot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed 18 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby Denny » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 01:59:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'I') was afraid if I read this thread it would piss me off. And it has.

Funny how true colours of some people come out when you put this before them.

Denny, it doesn't surprise me that you'd feel that way about Natives because your stinking so-called Christians gave a grand colonial attempt at assimilation and the stealing of Native lands and is clearly written in the history books. Fuck you both.

Now that native groups are finally getting strength and fighting for their rights and trying to get their stolen lands back, fucktards like Denny and Ferret try to make like there is some hidden conspiracy to screw over the poor non-Natives.

To all those who wrote sane, kind words, thank you.



I will apologize, I think I wrote more out of emotion, my basic feelings, which is my old man, than from what my beliefs tell me to become the new man I should be.

Yes, great wrongs were done to the first nations, rights violated, but in many cases you have to admit, it was done with a vision of a better way of life for the native peoples. Paternalistic, yes it was. But, in preaching the Christian faith, don't you honestly believe that Europeans were sharing their most precious possession? Why did the Canadian martyrs risk their lives to share this faith, knowing the risks? Because they felt it was worth it, to save souls. It was not for the land. We may look askance at that degree of faith today, but I don't think you can doubt their sincerity, their commitment and their love of their fellow man.

But, many deals were made with the native people in good faith and you have to admit, it seems like today everything is getting tied up with lawsuits and land seizures and I have to ask, what happened to keeping your word? When you say your lands were stolen, how can that be proven? Maybe some of your ancestors signed some bum deals, but a deal is a deal, right? I think the only way Indians have been cheated on the treaties is that the treaty money payment today is worthless compared to the historic value and these should be inflation indexed. If treaties are abrogated, then it will cast a pall over future deals with the native peoples, as negotiators will believe the terms will ultimately be contested, and that just creates all kinds of confusion and added cost for lawyers and interferes with planning.

Things work so much better when people stick to the written agreements, otherwise you have chaos. My sister is a lawyer and she says it causes all kinds of concern and worry on land deals by her clients when they feel their is a hindrance due to land claims. So all this muss and fuss is causing good people grief.
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby SpringCreekFarm » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 04:15:01

I was afraid if I stuck my nose into this thread I would be here a while, but I'm not going to do that.

I'm not going to try to get into this debate in detail because I've had far too many debates about it already most of my adult life and I'm 41. I don't really worry about it myself. I'm not a rebellious person per se. I'm not one of those people trying to make changes.

I'll make just a few more points and I'm going to try to disengage myself from this thread.

I agree that there could have been some screwups on the native side, therefore putting some of the land claims on shakey ground. I, however, don't have a clue because I'm not part of the process. It only stands to reason and I've always said that.

It is hard to prove or disprove something when the only accepted proof is in written form. The natives practiced an oral tradition which has only recently been given consideration in talks. The only things being written down in those days was by the whites and they could have easily written anything they wanted because the Indians didn't understand their foreign language well, if at all.

The comments about the clergy having the natives best interest in mind when they come over here is possible, but to a larger extent the underlying motivation was to assimilate and therefore control the native population. It's sort of like gathering more flies with sugar than with salt. It was paternalistic and the truth is, the natives were doing just fine beforehand, thank you very much.

There is a lot of history in print for those who care to read it. I'm no expert at any of this and believe me you almost have to be to carry on a serious debate. Therefore I'll not waste your time.

I prefer to spend my time quietly preparing for hard times and hoping political uprisings keep well away from me.

I believe we'll all start off on a different footing after a crash really goes south, whereby all bets are off, all rules will change and the constitutions and treaties will be moot.

Maybe then we'll see a real shake up in who's sovereign here and there amongst all peoples of this land.
SpringCreekFarm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri 03 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 05:53:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut, in preaching the Christian faith, don't you honestly believe that Europeans were sharing their most precious possession? Why did the Canadian martyrs risk their lives to share this faith, knowing the risks? Because they felt it was worth it, to save souls. It was not for the land. We may look askance at that degree of faith today, but I don't think you can doubt their sincerity, their commitment and their love of their fellow man


I do totally question their committment and especially their love for their fellow man. As a wise man recently told me, "Christians are some of the most self-serving people around". Upon reflection and observation I have come to conclude that this is true based on my own personal experiences with christians.

I agree also with SCF's comment that it was more about the early christians desire to feel more comfortable by making natives conform and easier to control. I think its more important for any people to have the ability to be more independant.

But face it, whether you are Lakota or white or what ever, its really hard keep the government from insisting it has the right to order and govern your life, and I think that is what a lot of us here have in common... the desire for self-determination.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 11:24:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') used to be a right-wing Conservative Republican. But it dawned on on me, what are we conserving? There is movement in Conservative ranks. It's going to be clear to everyone in 2008 that we are in danger. Big danger. Liberal and Conservative is about to mean nothing.


I am still a right-wing Conservative Republican, but we've become vanishingly rare.

What we have is a lot of neocons, one-worlders, new-world-order types, religious nuts, globalists, Zionists, and every other stripe of warmonger and meddler you can imagine, under the Republican brand name.

One of the most unusual things to be nowadays is a right-wing Conservative Republican.
I don't know what to believe anymore. I do believe in humor, I believe in my kids, but beyond that I don't know. American Indians are in league with the Mafia. Gambling. Roulette, Slot Machines, 21.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from

Unread postby kabu » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 13:43:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('128shot', '
')Wow, instead of making a counter point, this is so much easier huh?
Sorry, I can't be bothered to take the place of your straw man. He's a figment of your imagination, not mine.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('128shot', 'R')eally, what your post seems to jumble into essentially that, though. you're arguing that because of what we did we somehow "owe" them now.
Why? Just because you say so? Perhaps that's just a position that you're used to dealing with, and aching to deal with?

I made a modest point about what's been taken away from the Native communities versus what's been given to them, indicating that a P&L statement will NOT account for much of the former. I then commented on how hopeful self-empowered was within the Lakota community would be.

How you could construe that into "screw the white man. If you're Latino, Black, Indian, or any other minority except Asian you're basically entitled to receiving aid," is beyond me. So keep mumbling/ranting to yourself, by all means, but please do so in the corner!
User avatar
kabu
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests